These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

330 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23446226)

  • 21. Listening Effort Through Depth of Processing in School-Age Children.
    Hsu BC; Vanpoucke F; van Wieringen A
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):568-576. PubMed ID: 28399062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Lexicality and frequency in specific language impairment: accuracy and error data from two nonword repetition tests.
    Jones G; Tamburelli M; Watson SE; Gobet F; Pine JM
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2010 Dec; 53(6):1642-55. PubMed ID: 20705751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effects of Simulated Hearing Loss on Bilingual Children's Consonant Recognition in Noise.
    Nishi K; Trevino AC; Rosado Rogers L; García P; Neely ST
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):e292-e304. PubMed ID: 28353522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Combined effects of noise and reverberation on speech recognition performance of normal-hearing children and adults.
    Neuman AC; Wroblewski M; Hajicek J; Rubinstein A
    Ear Hear; 2010 Jun; 31(3):336-44. PubMed ID: 20215967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Audibility-based predictions of speech recognition for children and adults with normal hearing.
    McCreery RW; Stelmachowicz PG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Dec; 130(6):4070-81. PubMed ID: 22225061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evaluation of Speech-Evoked Envelope Following Responses as an Objective Aided Outcome Measure: Effect of Stimulus Level, Bandwidth, and Amplification in Adults With Hearing Loss.
    Easwar V; Purcell DW; Aiken SJ; Parsa V; Scollie SD
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(6):635-52. PubMed ID: 26226606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Children's auditory working memory performance in degraded listening conditions.
    Osman H; Sullivan JR
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2014 Aug; 57(4):1503-11. PubMed ID: 24686855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Children with specific language impairment and resolved late talkers: working memory profiles at 5 years.
    Petruccelli N; Bavin EL; Bretherton L
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Dec; 55(6):1690-703. PubMed ID: 22562828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Auditory, Cognitive, and Linguistic Factors Predict Speech Recognition in Adverse Listening Conditions for Children With Hearing Loss.
    McCreery RW; Walker EA; Spratford M; Lewis D; Brennan M
    Front Neurosci; 2019; 13():1093. PubMed ID: 31680828
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The Effect of Signal-to-Noise Ratio on Linguistic Processing in a Semantic Judgment Task: An Aging Study.
    Stanley N; Davis T; Estis J
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Mar; 28(3):209-221. PubMed ID: 28277212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Task difficulty differentially affects two measures of processing load: the pupil response during sentence processing and delayed cued recall of the sentences.
    Zekveld AA; Festen JM; Kramer SE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Aug; 56(4):1156-65. PubMed ID: 23785182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The effect of background babble on working memory in young and middle-aged adults.
    Neidleman MT; Wambacq I; Besing J; Spitzer JB; Koehnke J
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Mar; 26(3):220-8. PubMed ID: 25751691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Linguistic Factors Influencing Speech Audiometric Assessment.
    Coene M; Krijger S; Meeuws M; De Ceulaer G; Govaerts PJ
    Biomed Res Int; 2016; 2016():7249848. PubMed ID: 27830152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Sonority's Effect as a Surface Cue on Lexical Speech Perception of Children With Cochlear Implants.
    Hamza Y; Okalidou A; Kyriafinis G; van Wieringen A
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(5):992-1007. PubMed ID: 29517521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Nonword repetition by children with cochlear implants: accuracy ratings from normal-hearing listeners.
    Dillon CM; Burkholder RA; Cleary M; Pisoni DB
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Oct; 47(5):1103-16. PubMed ID: 15603465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Speech Recognition and Parent Ratings From Auditory Development Questionnaires in Children Who Are Hard of Hearing.
    McCreery RW; Walker EA; Spratford M; Oleson J; Bentler R; Holte L; Roush P
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36 Suppl 1(0 1):60S-75S. PubMed ID: 26731160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Auditory models of suprathreshold distortion and speech intelligibility in persons with impaired hearing.
    Bernstein JG; Summers V; Grassi E; Grant KW
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):307-28. PubMed ID: 23636211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The effects of hearing aid use on listening effort and mental fatigue associated with sustained speech processing demands.
    Hornsby BW
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):523-34. PubMed ID: 23426091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Behavioral Measures of Listening Effort in School-Age Children: Examining the Effects of Signal-to-Noise Ratio, Hearing Loss, and Amplification.
    McGarrigle R; Gustafson SJ; Hornsby BWY; Bess FH
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(2):381-392. PubMed ID: 29905670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Auditory Working Memory Explains Variance in Speech Recognition in Older Listeners Under Adverse Listening Conditions.
    Kim S; Choi I; Schwalje AT; Kim K; Lee JH
    Clin Interv Aging; 2020; 15():395-406. PubMed ID: 32231429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.