These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23446757)

  • 1. [Immune reactions after DMEK, DSAEK and DALK].
    Steven P; Hos D; Heindl LM; Bock F; Cursiefen C
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2013 May; 230(5):494-9. PubMed ID: 23446757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Immune reactions after modern lamellar (DALK, DSAEK, DMEK) versus conventional penetrating corneal transplantation.
    Hos D; Matthaei M; Bock F; Maruyama K; Notara M; Clahsen T; Hou Y; Le VNH; Salabarria AC; Horstmann J; Bachmann BO; Cursiefen C
    Prog Retin Eye Res; 2019 Nov; 73():100768. PubMed ID: 31279005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty--rapid recovery of visual acuity.
    Maier P; Reinhard T; Cursiefen C
    Dtsch Arztebl Int; 2013 May; 110(21):365-71. PubMed ID: 23795211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Update Minimally Invasive Lamellar Keratoplasty: DMEK, DSAEK and DALK].
    Cursiefen C; Schaub F; Bachmann BO
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2016 Sep; 233(9):1033-42. PubMed ID: 27414243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty versus descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.
    Tourtas T; Laaser K; Bachmann BO; Cursiefen C; Kruse FE
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 Jun; 153(6):1082-90.e2. PubMed ID: 22397955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Split cornea transplantation for 2 recipients - review of the first 100 consecutive patients.
    Heindl LM; Riss S; Laaser K; Bachmann BO; Kruse FE; Cursiefen C
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2011 Oct; 152(4):523-532.e2. PubMed ID: 21726851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Incidence of early allograft rejection after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty.
    Dapena I; Ham L; Netuková M; van der Wees J; Melles GR
    Cornea; 2011 Dec; 30(12):1341-5. PubMed ID: 21955628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Update: Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) for keratoconus. When, how and why].
    Cursiefen C; Schaub F; Bachmann B
    Ophthalmologe; 2016 Mar; 113(3):204-12. PubMed ID: 26832733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Retrospective review of graft dislocation rate associated with descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty after primary failed penetrating keratoplasty.
    Clements JL; Bouchard CS; Lee WB; Dunn SP; Mannis MJ; Reidy JJ; John T; Hannush SB; Goins KM; Wagoner MD; Adi MA; Rubenstein JB; Udell IJ; Babiuch AS
    Cornea; 2011 Apr; 30(4):414-8. PubMed ID: 21099405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Graft rejection and graft failure after penetrating keratoplasty or posterior lamellar keratoplasty for fuchs endothelial dystrophy.
    Hjortdal J; Pedersen IB; Bak-Nielsen S; Ivarsen A
    Cornea; 2013 May; 32(5):e60-3. PubMed ID: 23086366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Identifying causes for poor visual outcome after DSEK/DSAEK following secondary DMEK in the same eye.
    Dirisamer M; Parker J; Naveiras M; Liarakos VS; Ham L; van Dijk K; Melles GR
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2013 Mar; 91(2):131-9. PubMed ID: 22989010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Corneal higher-order aberrations after Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty.
    Rudolph M; Laaser K; Bachmann BO; Cursiefen C; Epstein D; Kruse FE
    Ophthalmology; 2012 Mar; 119(3):528-35. PubMed ID: 22197439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Endothelial keratoplasty: fellow eyes comparison of Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty and Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty.
    Guerra FP; Anshu A; Price MO; Price FW
    Cornea; 2011 Dec; 30(12):1382-6. PubMed ID: 21993468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty with a stromal rim (DMEK-S).
    Studeny P; Farkas A; Vokrojova M; Liskova P; Jirsova K
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2010 Jul; 94(7):909-14. PubMed ID: 19850580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. New trends in corneal transplants at the University of Toronto.
    Chan SWS; Yucel Y; Gupta N
    Can J Ophthalmol; 2018 Dec; 53(6):580-587. PubMed ID: 30502981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Risk of corneal transplant rejection significantly reduced with Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty.
    Anshu A; Price MO; Price FW
    Ophthalmology; 2012 Mar; 119(3):536-40. PubMed ID: 22218143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Potential causes of incomplete visual rehabilitation at 6 months postoperative after descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty.
    Dapena I; Yeh RY; Baydoun L; Cabrerizo J; van Dijk K; Ham L; Melles GR
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2013 Oct; 156(4):780-8. PubMed ID: 23876866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Small-incision Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty: a comparison of small-incision tissue injector and forceps techniques.
    Foster JB; Swan KR; Vasan RA; Greven MA; Walter KA
    Cornea; 2012 Jan; 31(1):42-7. PubMed ID: 22081149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of posterior lamellar keratoplasty techniques to penetrating keratoplasty.
    Bahar I; Kaiserman I; McAllum P; Slomovic A; Rootman D
    Ophthalmology; 2008 Sep; 115(9):1525-33. PubMed ID: 18440638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Graft rejection following descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty: features, risk factors, and outcomes.
    Wu EI; Ritterband DC; Yu G; Shields RA; Seedor JA
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 May; 153(5):949-957.e1. PubMed ID: 22265142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.