These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

383 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23447485)

  • 1. Comparison of cochlear implant performance after round window electrode insertion compared with traditional cochleostomy.
    Kang BJ; Kim AH
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2013 May; 148(5):822-6. PubMed ID: 23447485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cochlear implantation outcomes with round window electrode insertion versus cochleostomy insertion.
    Elafandi H; Khalifa MA; Elguindy AS
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Nov; 138():110272. PubMed ID: 32798831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The round window: is it the "cochleostomy" of choice? Experience in 130 consecutive cochlear implants.
    Gudis DA; Montes M; Bigelow DC; Ruckenstein MJ
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Dec; 33(9):1497-501. PubMed ID: 22972422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cochlear implantation and hearing preservation: Results in 21 consecutively operated patients using the round window approach.
    Erixon E; Köbler S; Rask-Andersen H
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2012 Sep; 132(9):923-31. PubMed ID: 22667762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Radiologic Results and Hearing Preservation With a Straight Narrow Electrode via Round Window Versus Cochleostomy Approach at Initial Activation.
    Hassepass F; Aschendorff A; Bulla S; Arndt S; Maier W; Laszig R; Beck R
    Otol Neurotol; 2015 Jul; 36(6):993-1000. PubMed ID: 25675315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparable Electrode Impedance and Speech Perception at 12 Months after Cochlear Implantation Using Round Window versus Cochleostomy: An Analysis of 40 Patients.
    Cheng X; Wang B; Liu Y; Yuan Y; Shu Y; Chen B
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2018; 80(5-6):248-258. PubMed ID: 30121670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Intraoperative electrically evoked stapedius reflex thresholds in children undergone cochlear implantation: round window and cochleostomy approaches.
    Karatas E; Aud MD; Baglam T; Durucu C; Baysal E; Kanlikama M
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2011 Sep; 75(9):1123-6. PubMed ID: 21737149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cochleostomy versus round window insertions: influence on functional outcomes in electric-acoustic stimulation of the auditory system.
    Adunka OF; Dillon MT; Adunka MC; King ER; Pillsbury HC; Buchman CA
    Otol Neurotol; 2014 Apr; 35(4):613-8. PubMed ID: 24557034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Does pediatric cochlear implant insertion technique affect intraoperative neural response telemetry thresholds?
    Poley M; Overmyer E; Craun P; Holcomb M; Reilly B; White D; Preciado D
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Sep; 79(9):1404-7. PubMed ID: 26166451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Delayed low frequency hearing loss caused by cochlear implantation interventions via the round window but not cochleostomy.
    Rowe D; Chambers S; Hampson A; Eastwood H; Campbell L; O'Leary S
    Hear Res; 2016 Mar; 333():49-57. PubMed ID: 26739790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Spectral resolution and speech perception after cochlear implantation using the round window versus cochleostomy technique.
    Demir B; Yüksel M; Atılgan A; Ciprut A; Batman C
    J Laryngol Otol; 2021 Jun; 135(6):513-517. PubMed ID: 33958008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Partial deafness treatment with the nucleus straight research array cochlear implant.
    Skarzynski H; Lorens A; Matusiak M; Porowski M; Skarzynski PH; James CJ
    Audiol Neurootol; 2012; 17(2):82-91. PubMed ID: 21846981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Effect of Round Window vs Cochleostomy Surgical Approaches on Cochlear Implant Electrode Position: A Flat-Panel Computed Tomography Study.
    Jiam NT; Jiradejvong P; Pearl MS; Limb CJ
    JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2016 Sep; 142(9):873-80. PubMed ID: 27355198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cochlear implantation: is hearing preservation necessary in severe to profound hearing loss?
    Derinsu U; Serin GM; Akdaş F; Batman Ç
    J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 22(2):520-2. PubMed ID: 21403538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cochlear implantation with the nucleus slim modiolar electrode (CI532): a preliminary experience.
    Cuda D; Murri A
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Dec; 274(12):4141-4148. PubMed ID: 29032420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Does cochleostomy location influence electrode trajectory and intracochlear trauma?
    Zhou L; Friedmann DR; Treaba C; Peng R; Roland JT
    Laryngoscope; 2015 Apr; 125(4):966-71. PubMed ID: 25345671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Do we really need a Coupler for the round window application of an AMEI?
    Schwab B; Grigoleit S; Teschner M
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Sep; 34(7):1181-5. PubMed ID: 23921921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Subjective and objective results after bilateral cochlear implantation in adults.
    Laske RD; Veraguth D; Dillier N; Binkert A; Holzmann D; Huber AM
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 19318885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison between neural response telemetry via cochleostomy or the round window approach in cochlear implantation.
    Hamerschmidt R; Schuch LH; Rezende RK; Wiemes GR; Oliveira AK; Mocellin M
    Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2012; 78(4):71-5. PubMed ID: 22936140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.