These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23447658)

  • 41. Patient satisfaction in otolaryngology: Can academic institutions compete?
    Boss EF; Thompson RE
    Laryngoscope; 2012 May; 122(5):1000-9. PubMed ID: 22461170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Good physicians from the perspective of their patients.
    Schattner A; Rudin D; Jellin N
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2004 Sep; 4(1):26. PubMed ID: 15361255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Constructions of sexuality and intimacy after cancer: patient and health professional perspectives.
    Hordern AJ; Street AF
    Soc Sci Med; 2007 Apr; 64(8):1704-18. PubMed ID: 17261346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Involvement of patients with cancer in patient safety: a qualitative study of current practices, potentials and barriers.
    Martin HM; Navne LE; Lipczak H
    BMJ Qual Saf; 2013 Oct; 22(10):836-42. PubMed ID: 23754594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Overcoming the barriers to patient-centred care: time, tools and training.
    West E; Barron DN; Reeves R
    J Clin Nurs; 2005 Apr; 14(4):435-43. PubMed ID: 15807750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The psychometric properties of the 'Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture' in Dutch hospitals.
    Smits M; Christiaans-Dingelhoff I; Wagner C; Wal Gv; Groenewegen PP
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2008 Nov; 8():230. PubMed ID: 18990256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Patient involvement in patient safety: the health-care professional's perspective.
    Davis RE; Sevdalis N; Vincent CA
    J Patient Saf; 2012 Dec; 8(4):182-8. PubMed ID: 23007240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. A qualitative exploration of patients' attitudes towards the 'Participate Inform Notice Know' (PINK) patient safety video.
    Pinto A; Vincent C; Darzi A; Davis R
    Int J Qual Health Care; 2013 Feb; 25(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 23175533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. [Efficiency versus quality in the NHS, in Portugal: methodologies for evaluation].
    Giraldes Mdo R
    Acta Med Port; 2008; 21(5):397-410. PubMed ID: 19187682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The cost of harm and savings through safety: using simulated patients for leadership decision support.
    Denham CR; Guilloteau FR
    J Patient Saf; 2012 Sep; 8(3):89-96. PubMed ID: 22785347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Healthcare professional and patient codesign and validation of a mechanism for service users to feedback patient safety experiences following a care transfer: a qualitative study.
    Scott J; Heavey E; Waring J; Jones D; Dawson P
    BMJ Open; 2016 Jul; 6(7):e011222. PubMed ID: 27406641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. A framework of a patient safety information system for Iranian hospitals: lessons learned from Australia, England and the US.
    Sheikhtaheri A; Sadoughi F; Ahmadi M; Moghaddasi H
    Int J Med Inform; 2013 May; 82(5):335-44. PubMed ID: 22770577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Understanding patients' satisfaction with physician assistant/associate encounters through communication experiences: a qualitative study in acute hospitals in England.
    Taylor F; Halter M; Drennan VM
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2019 Aug; 19(1):603. PubMed ID: 31455342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. What can patients tell us about the quality and safety of hospital care? Findings from a UK multicentre survey study.
    O'Hara JK; Reynolds C; Moore S; Armitage G; Sheard L; Marsh C; Watt I; Wright J; Lawton R
    BMJ Qual Saf; 2018 Sep; 27(9):673-682. PubMed ID: 29545325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Identifying and correcting communication failures among health professionals working in the Emergency Department.
    Bagnasco A; Tubino B; Piccotti E; Rosa F; Aleo G; Di Pietro P; Sasso L; Gambino L; Passalacqua D;
    Int Emerg Nurs; 2013 Jul; 21(3):168-72. PubMed ID: 23207054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Investigating the feasibility of a patient feedback tool to improve safety in Australian primary care: a study protocol.
    Hernan AL; Kloot K; Giles SJ; Beks H; McNamara K; Binder MJ; Versace V
    BMJ Open; 2019 May; 9(5):e027327. PubMed ID: 31061052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Mapping the patient safety footprint: The RADICAL framework.
    Edozien LC
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2013 Aug; 27(4):481-8. PubMed ID: 23721815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Trust, temporality and systems: how do patients understand patient safety in primary care? A qualitative study.
    Rhodes P; Campbell S; Sanders C
    Health Expect; 2016 Apr; 19(2):253-63. PubMed ID: 25644998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Can patient involvement improve patient safety? A cluster randomised control trial of the Patient Reporting and Action for a Safe Environment (PRASE) intervention.
    Lawton R; O'Hara JK; Sheard L; Armitage G; Cocks K; Buckley H; Corbacho B; Reynolds C; Marsh C; Moore S; Watt I; Wright J
    BMJ Qual Saf; 2017 Aug; 26(8):622-631. PubMed ID: 28159854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. A qualitative study of patient involvement in medicines management after hospital discharge: an under-recognised source of systems resilience.
    Fylan B; Armitage G; Naylor D; Blenkinsopp A
    BMJ Qual Saf; 2018 Jul; 27(7):539-546. PubMed ID: 29146681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.