These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Luminance-contrast properties of contour-shape processing revealed through the shape-frequency after-effect. Gheorghiu E; Kingdom FA Vision Res; 2006 Oct; 46(21):3603-15. PubMed ID: 16769101 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Adapting to an aftereffect. Sheth BR; Shimojo S J Vis; 2008 Mar; 8(3):29.1-10. PubMed ID: 18484835 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Chromatic properties of texture-shape and of texture-surround suppression of contour-shape mechanisms. Gheorghiu E; Kingdom FA J Vis; 2012 Jun; 12(6):16. PubMed ID: 22693334 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Contour adaptation reduces the spreading of edge induced colors. Coia AJ; Crognale MA Vision Res; 2018 Oct; 151():135-140. PubMed ID: 28427892 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Curvature coding in illusory contours. Gheorghiu E; Kingdom FA; Sull M; Wells S Vision Res; 2009 Oct; 49(20):2518-30. PubMed ID: 19682486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Chromatic tuning of contour-shape mechanisms revealed through the shape-frequency and shape-amplitude after-effects. Gheorghiu E; Kingdom FA Vision Res; 2007 Jun; 47(14):1935-49. PubMed ID: 17499333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Local and global components of texture-surround suppression of contour-shape coding. Gheorghiu E; Kingdom FA J Vis; 2012 Jun; 12(6):20. PubMed ID: 22707427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of luminance contrast on the motion aftereffect. Ishihara M Percept Mot Skills; 1999 Feb; 88(1):215-23. PubMed ID: 10214646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Testing the role of luminance edges in White's illusion with contour adaptation. Betz T; Shapley R; Wichmann FA; Maertens M J Vis; 2015 Aug; 15(11):14. PubMed ID: 26305862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Aftereffect of adaptation to Glass patterns. Clifford CW; Weston E Vision Res; 2005 May; 45(11):1355-63. PubMed ID: 15743606 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Spatial offset of test field elements from surround elements affects the strength of motion aftereffects. Harris J; Sullivan D; Oakley M Perception; 2008; 37(7):1010-21. PubMed ID: 18773724 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Tilt aftereffect for texture edges is larger than in matched subjective edges, but both are strong adaptors of luminance edges. Hawley SJ; Keeble DR J Vis; 2006 Jan; 6(1):37-52. PubMed ID: 16489857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Flicker adaptation or superimposition raises the apparent spatial frequency of coarse test gratings. Kaneko S; Giaschi D; Anstis S Vision Res; 2015 Mar; 108():85-92. PubMed ID: 25666488 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of perceptual contour orientation uncertainty on the tilt aftereffect. Erlikhman G; Singh G; Ghose T; Liu Z Vision Res; 2019 May; 158():126-134. PubMed ID: 30797766 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Grating induction: a new type of aftereffect. Tyler CW; Nakayama K Vision Res; 1980; 20(5):437-41. PubMed ID: 7414978 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Luminance-contrast properties of texture-shape and texture-surround suppression of contour shape. Gheorghiu E; Kingdom FAA J Vis; 2019 Oct; 19(12):4. PubMed ID: 31613953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Global contour shapes are coded differently from their local components. Bell J; Kingdom FA Vision Res; 2009 Jun; 49(13):1702-10. PubMed ID: 19375448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Size and shape after-effects: same or different mechanism? Gheorghiu E; Kingdom FA; Witney E Vision Res; 2010 Oct; 50(21):2127-36. PubMed ID: 20699103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]