These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23448880)

  • 1. Selection gradients, the opportunity for selection, and the coefficient of determination.
    Moorad JA; Wade MJ
    Am Nat; 2013 Mar; 181(3):291-300. PubMed ID: 23448880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How multiple mating by females affects sexual selection.
    Shuster SM; Briggs WR; Dennis PA
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2013 Mar; 368(1613):20120046. PubMed ID: 23339237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Experimental evidence for multivariate stabilizing sexual selection.
    Brooks R; Hunt J; Blows MW; Smith MJ; Bussière LF; Jennions MD
    Evolution; 2005 Apr; 59(4):871-80. PubMed ID: 15926696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Estimating the strength of sexual selection from Y-chromosome and mitochondrial DNA diversity.
    Wade MJ; Shuster SM
    Evolution; 2004 Jul; 58(7):1613-6. PubMed ID: 15341163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Natural and sexual selection in a monogamous historical human population.
    Courtiol A; Pettay JE; Jokela M; Rotkirch A; Lummaa V
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2012 May; 109(21):8044-9. PubMed ID: 22547810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On the definition and measurement of fitness in finite populations.
    Hansen TF
    J Theor Biol; 2017 Apr; 419():36-43. PubMed ID: 28041891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reconciling strong stabilizing selection with the maintenance of genetic variation in a natural population of black field crickets (Teleogryllus commodus).
    Hunt J; Blows MW; Zajitschek F; Jennions MD; Brooks R
    Genetics; 2007 Oct; 177(2):875-80. PubMed ID: 17660544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Phenotypic selection in natural populations: what limits directional selection?
    Kingsolver JG; Diamond SE
    Am Nat; 2011 Mar; 177(3):346-57. PubMed ID: 21460543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Female-specific resource limitation does not make the opportunity for selection more female biased.
    Martinossi-Allibert I; Liljestrand Rönn J; Immonen E
    Evolution; 2020 Dec; 74(12):2714-2724. PubMed ID: 33043452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A cost of sexual attractiveness to high-fitness females.
    Long TA; Pischedda A; Stewart AD; Rice WR
    PLoS Biol; 2009 Dec; 7(12):e1000254. PubMed ID: 19997646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reduced genetic variance among high fitness individuals: inferring stabilizing selection on male sexual displays in Drosophila serrata.
    Sztepanacz JL; Rundle HD
    Evolution; 2012 Oct; 66(10):3101-10. PubMed ID: 23025601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sex-specific dominance reversal of genetic variation for fitness.
    Grieshop K; Arnqvist G
    PLoS Biol; 2018 Dec; 16(12):e2006810. PubMed ID: 30533008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Correlational selection leads to genetic integration of body size and an attractive plumage trait in dark-eyed juncos.
    McGlothlin JW; Parker PG; Nolan V; Ketterson ED
    Evolution; 2005 Mar; 59(3):658-71. PubMed ID: 15856707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Analytical results for directional and quadratic selection gradients for log-linear models of fitness functions.
    Morrissey MB; Goudie IBJ
    Evolution; 2022 Jul; 76(7):1378-1390. PubMed ID: 35340021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mating advantage for rare males in wild guppy populations.
    Hughes KA; Houde AE; Price AC; Rodd FH
    Nature; 2013 Nov; 503(7474):108-10. PubMed ID: 24172904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparing strengths of directional selection: how strong is strong?
    Hereford J; Hansen TF; Houle D
    Evolution; 2004 Oct; 58(10):2133-43. PubMed ID: 15562680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. SEXUAL SELECTION AND MALE CHARACTERISTICS IN THE BLUEHEAD WRASSE, THALASSOMA BIFASCIATUM: MATING SITE ACQUISITION, MATING SITE DEFENSE, AND FEMALE CHOICE.
    Warner RR; Schultz ET
    Evolution; 1992 Oct; 46(5):1421-1442. PubMed ID: 28569004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Natural selection. II. Developmental variability and evolutionary rate.
    Frank SA
    J Evol Biol; 2011 Nov; 24(11):2310-20. PubMed ID: 21939464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cryptic selection forces and dynamic heritability in generalized phenotypic evolution.
    Gilpin W; Feldman MW
    Theor Popul Biol; 2019 Feb; 125():20-29. PubMed ID: 30528351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Direct and indirect sexual selection and quantitative genetics of male traits in guppies (Poecilia reticulata).
    Brooks R; Endler JA
    Evolution; 2001 May; 55(5):1002-15. PubMed ID: 11430637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.