121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23450158)
1. The effect of breast shielding during lumbar spine radiography.
Mekis N; Zontar D; Skrk D
Radiol Oncol; 2013 Mar; 47(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 23450158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of breast shielding outside the field of view on breast entrance surface dose in axial X-ray examinations: a phantom study.
Hurley L; Alashban Y; Albeshan S; England A; McEntee MF
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2023 May; 29(3):555-560. PubMed ID: 37129301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effectiveness of Breast and Eye Shielding During Cervical Spine Radiography: An Experimental Study.
Elshami W; Abuzaid MM; Tekin HO
Risk Manag Healthc Policy; 2020; 13():697-704. PubMed ID: 32636688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Absorbed radiation dose of the female breast during diagnostic multidetector chest CT and dose reduction with a tungsten-antimony composite breast shield: preliminary results.
Parker MS; Kelleher NM; Hoots JA; Chung JK; Fatouros PP; Benedict SH
Clin Radiol; 2008 Mar; 63(3):278-88. PubMed ID: 18275868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Radiation dose to the thyroid gland and breast from multidetector computed tomography of the cervical spine: does bismuth shielding with and without a cervical collar reduce dose?
Gunn ML; Kanal KM; Kolokythas O; Anzai Y
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009; 33(6):987-90. PubMed ID: 19940673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Breast surface radiation dose during coronary CT angiography: reduction by breast displacement and lead shielding.
Foley SJ; McEntee MF; Achenbach S; Brennan PC; Rainford LS; Dodd JD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Aug; 197(2):367-73. PubMed ID: 21785082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. "Anode heel effect" on patient dose in lumbar spine radiography.
Fung KK; Gilboy WB
Br J Radiol; 2000 May; 73(869):531-6. PubMed ID: 10884750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Female breast radiation exposure during thorax multidetector computed tomography and the effectiveness of bismuth breast shield to reduce breast radiation dose.
Yilmaz MH; Albayram S; Yaşar D; Ozer H; Adaletli I; Selçuk D; Akman C; Altuğ A
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2007; 31(1):138-42. PubMed ID: 17259846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Investigation of the entrance surface dose and dose to different organs in lumbar spine imaging.
Sina S; Zeinali B; Karimipoorfard M; Lotfalizadeh F; Sadeghi M; Zamani E; Faghihi R
J Biomed Phys Eng; 2014 Dec; 4(4):119-26. PubMed ID: 25599058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Lead-rubber shielding effect on radiation dose to the gonads from a bilateral hand X-ray examination.
Welborn D; Lockwood P
Radiography (Lond); 2022 May; 28(2):360-365. PubMed ID: 35000868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dose reduction in maxillofacial imaging using low dose Cone Beam CT.
Tsiklakis K; Donta C; Gavala S; Karayianni K; Kamenopoulou V; Hourdakis CJ
Eur J Radiol; 2005 Dec; 56(3):413-7. PubMed ID: 15978765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Coronary calcium scoring with MDCT: the radiation dose to the breast and the effectiveness of bismuth breast shield.
Yilmaz MH; Yaşar D; Albayram S; Adaletli I; Ozer H; Ozbayrak M; Mihmanli I; Akman C
Eur J Radiol; 2007 Jan; 61(1):139-43. PubMed ID: 16962280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Embryo/fetus radiation dose and risk from dual X-ray absorptiometry examinations.
Damilakis J; Perisinakis K; Vrahoriti H; Kontakis G; Varveris H; Gourtsoyiannis N
Osteoporos Int; 2002 Sep; 13(9):716-22. PubMed ID: 12195535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mobile C-arm cone-beam CT for guidance of spine surgery: image quality, radiation dose, and integration with interventional guidance.
Schafer S; Nithiananthan S; Mirota DJ; Uneri A; Stayman JW; Zbijewski W; Schmidgunst C; Kleinszig G; Khanna AJ; Siewerdsena JH
Med Phys; 2011 Aug; 38(8):4563-74. PubMed ID: 21928628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. PATIENT DOSES IN COMMON DIAGNOSTIC X-RAY EXAMINATIONS.
Metaxas VI; Messaris GA; Lekatou AN; Petsas TG; Panayiotakis GS
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Jul; 184(1):12-27. PubMed ID: 30289498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. LOW BMI PATIENT DOSE IN DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY.
Efthymiou FO; Metaxas VI; Dimitroukas CP; Panayiotakis GS
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2020 Jul; 189(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 32043128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of anteroposterior and posteroanterior projection in lumbar spine radiography.
Alukic E; Skrk D; Mekis N
Radiol Oncol; 2018 May; 52(4):468-474. PubMed ID: 30511934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. How does a non-optimal tube potential influence radiation dose to the patient in lumbar spine radiography?
Alukic E; Mekis N
Radiography (Lond); 2021 Nov; 27(4):1105-1109. PubMed ID: 34011453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. PATIENT DOSE IN DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY UTILISING BMI CLASSIFICATION.
Metaxas VI; Messaris GA; Lekatou AN; Petsas TG; Panayiotakis GS
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Aug; 184(2):155-167. PubMed ID: 30452729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of Eye and Breast Shielding on Organ Doses During Cervical Spine Radiography: Design and Validation of MIRD Computational Phantom.
Elshami W; Tekin HO; Issa SAM; Abuzaid MM; Zakaly HMH; Issa B; Ene A
Front Public Health; 2021; 9():751577. PubMed ID: 34746086
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
