135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23451433)
1. Radiographic assessment in bilateral primary total knee arthroplasty: computer-assisted surgery vs. conventional surgery.
Ruangthong N; Sriphirom P
J Med Assoc Thai; 2012 Oct; 95 Suppl 10():S20-5. PubMed ID: 23451433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Improved femoral component rotation in advanced genu valgum deformity using computer-assisted measured resection total knee arthroplasty.
Lin SJ; Lee CY; Huang KC; Peng KT; Huang TW; Lee MS; Hsu RW; Shen WJ
J Orthop Surg Res; 2015 Sep; 10():135. PubMed ID: 26328925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Robot-assisted implantation improves the precision of component position in minimally invasive TKA.
Kim SM; Park YS; Ha CW; Lim SJ; Moon YW
Orthopedics; 2012 Sep; 35(9):e1334-9. PubMed ID: 22955398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of robot-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty: a controlled cadaver study using multiparameter quantitative three-dimensional CT assessment of alignment.
Moon YW; Ha CW; Do KH; Kim CY; Han JH; Na SE; Lee CH; Kim JG; Park YS
Comput Aided Surg; 2012; 17(2):86-95. PubMed ID: 22348661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Computer-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty vs. Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty: Post-Operative Ankle Radiographic Findings and Ankle Clinical Assessment.
Chompoosang T; Khongphaophong M; Chunsiri P; Sripirom P
J Med Assoc Thai; 2016 Feb; 99 Suppl 2():S168-74. PubMed ID: 27266232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Does computer-assisted surgery improve postoperative leg alignment and implant positioning following total knee arthroplasty? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials?
Cheng T; Zhao S; Peng X; Zhang X
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2012 Jul; 20(7):1307-22. PubMed ID: 21732057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Patient specific cutting guides versus an imageless, computer-assisted surgery system in total knee arthroplasty.
Nam D; Maher PA; Rebolledo BJ; Nawabi DH; McLawhorn AS; Pearle AD
Knee; 2013 Aug; 20(4):263-7. PubMed ID: 23347791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Radiographic results of an accelerometer-based, handheld surgical navigation system for the tibial resection in total knee arthroplasty.
Nam D; Cross M; Deshmane P; Jerabek S; Kang M; Mayman DJ
Orthopedics; 2011 Oct; 34(10):e615-21. PubMed ID: 21956055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Comparison of the Medium-Term Results of Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Computer-Assisted and Conventional Techniques to Treat Patients With Extraarticular Femoral Deformities.
Bae DK; Song SJ; Park CH; Ko YW; Lee H
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Jan; 32(1):71-78. PubMed ID: 27460297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of radiographic alignment of imageless computer-assisted surgery vs conventional instrumentation in primary total knee arthroplasty.
Barrett WP; Mason JB; Moskal JT; Dalury DF; Oliashirazi A; Fisher DA
J Arthroplasty; 2011 Dec; 26(8):1273-1284.e1. PubMed ID: 21723703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Abnormal rate of intraoperative and postoperative implant positioning outliers using "MRI-based patient-specific" compared to "computer assisted" instrumentation in total knee replacement.
Ollivier M; Tribot-Laspiere Q; Amzallag J; Boisrenoult P; Pujol N; Beaufils P
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2016 Nov; 24(11):3441-3447. PubMed ID: 25994474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Computer navigated versus conventional total knee arthroplasty.
Tolk JJ; Koot HW; Janssen RP
J Knee Surg; 2012 Sep; 25(4):347-52. PubMed ID: 23150163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Computer-navigated minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty for patients with retained implants in the femur.
Lin SY; Chen CH; Huang PJ; Fu YC; Huang HT
Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2014 Aug; 30(8):415-21. PubMed ID: 25002380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Total knee arthroplasty with use of computer-assisted navigation compared with conventional guiding systems in the same patient: radiographic results in Asian patients.
Huang TW; Hsu WH; Peng KT; Hsu RW; Weng YJ; Shen WJ
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Jul; 93(13):1197-202. PubMed ID: 21776572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of alignment using patient specific guides, computer navigation and conventional instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty.
MacDessi SJ; Jang B; Harris IA; Wheatley E; Bryant C; Chen DB
Knee; 2014 Mar; 21(2):406-9. PubMed ID: 24378337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. No effect of obesity on limb and component alignment after computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty.
Shetty GM; Mullaji AB; Bhayde S; Lingaraju AP
Knee; 2014 Aug; 21(4):862-5. PubMed ID: 24799079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative mechanical axis deviation after TKA between conventional and CAS procedure.
Leelasestaporn C
J Med Assoc Thai; 2010 Feb; 93(2):205-10. PubMed ID: 20302002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Differences in measurement of lower limb alignment among different registration methods of navigation and radiographs in TKA using the OrthoPilot system.
Seo SS; Seo JH; Sohn MW; Kim YJ
Orthopedics; 2012 Oct; 35(10 Suppl):50-5. PubMed ID: 23026253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Effect of the surgical time and coronalmechanical alignment after total knee arthroplasty using computer navigation system, traditionalor 3D printing patient-specific instruments].
Li Y; Tian H; Geng X
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2018 Jul; 98(27):2157-2161. PubMed ID: 30032517
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The benefits of computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty on coronal alignment with marked femoral bowing in Asian patients.
Lee CY; Lin SJ; Kuo LT; Peng KT; Huang KC; Huang TW; Lee MS; Hsu RW; Shen WJ
J Orthop Surg Res; 2014 Dec; 9():122. PubMed ID: 25466933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
