92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23451442)
1. A comparison of accuracy between step and non-step reamers of femoral intramedullary alignment system in total knee arthroplasty evaluated by computer-assisted navigation.
Vanasbodeekul P; Chotanaphuti T; Rattanaprichavej P; Wangwittayakul V
J Med Assoc Thai; 2012 Oct; 95 Suppl 10():S72-6. PubMed ID: 23451442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of robot-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty: a controlled cadaver study using multiparameter quantitative three-dimensional CT assessment of alignment.
Moon YW; Ha CW; Do KH; Kim CY; Han JH; Na SE; Lee CH; Kim JG; Park YS
Comput Aided Surg; 2012; 17(2):86-95. PubMed ID: 22348661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cadaveric analysis of an accelerometer-based portable navigation device for distal femoral cutting block alignment in total knee arthroplasty.
Nam D; Jerabek SA; Cross MB; Mayman DJ
Comput Aided Surg; 2012; 17(4):205-10. PubMed ID: 22681247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty: Does the tibial component remain at malposition risk?
Bové JC
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2010 Sep; 96(5):536-42. PubMed ID: 20605549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Rotational alignment of femoral component with computed-assisted surgery (CAS) during total knee arthroplasty].
Michaut M; Beaufils P; Galaud B; Abadie P; Boisrenoult P; Fallet L
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2008 Oct; 94(6):580-4. PubMed ID: 18929753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Precision of Ci-navigated extension and flexion gap balancing in total knee arthroplasty and analysis of potential predictive variables.
Fickert S; Jawhar A; Sunil P; Scharf HP
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2012 Apr; 132(4):565-74. PubMed ID: 22072193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Computer-assisted total-knee arthroplasty. Comparison of two successive systems. Learning curve].
Bové JC
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2008 May; 94(3):252-60. PubMed ID: 18456060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Computer-assisted surgery in total knee replacement. Preliminary results: report of 60 cases].
El Masri F; Rammal H; Ghanem I; El Hage S; El Abiad R; Kharrat K; Dagher F
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2008 May; 94(3):261-7. PubMed ID: 18456061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. How accurate is current TKR instrumentation?
Stulberg SD
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2003 Nov; (416):177-84. PubMed ID: 14646759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The variability of intramedullary alignment of the femoral component during total knee arthroplasty.
Mihalko WM; Boyle J; Clark LD; Krackow KA
J Arthroplasty; 2005 Jan; 20(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 15660056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accelerometer-based computer navigation for performing the distal femoral resection in total knee arthroplasty.
Nam D; Nawabi DH; Cross MB; Heyse TJ; Mayman DJ
J Arthroplasty; 2012 Oct; 27(9):1717-22. PubMed ID: 22440228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Alignment of resection planes in total knee replacement obtained with the conventional technique, as assessed by a modern computer-based navigation system.
Belvedere C; Ensini A; Leardini A; Bianchi L; Catani F; Giannini S
Int J Med Robot; 2007 Jun; 3(2):117-24. PubMed ID: 17619241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intramedullary control of distal femoral resection results in precise coronal alignment in TKA.
Pfitzner T; von Roth P; Perka C; Matziolis G
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2014 Apr; 134(4):459-65. PubMed ID: 24488448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative study between computer assisted-navigation and conventional technique in minimally invasive surgery total knee arthroplasty, prospective control study.
Chotanaphuti T; Ongnamthip P; Teeraleekul K; Kraturerk C
J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 Sep; 91(9):1382-8. PubMed ID: 18843868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cutting error of the distal femur in total knee arthroplasty by use of a navigation system.
Nakahara H; Matsuda S; Moro-oka TA; Okazaki K; Tashiro Y; Iwamoto Y
J Arthroplasty; 2012 Jun; 27(6):1119-22. PubMed ID: 22019323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of total knee arthroplasty using computer-assisted navigation versus conventional guiding systems: a prospective study.
Pang CH; Chan WL; Yen CH; Cheng SC; Woo SB; Choi ST; Hui WK; Mak KH
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2009 Aug; 17(2):170-3. PubMed ID: 19721145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of computer-assisted navigation and conventional instrumentation for bilateral total knee arthroplasty.
Weng YJ; Hsu RW; Hsu WH
J Arthroplasty; 2009 Aug; 24(5):668-73. PubMed ID: 18534395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of a computer-assisted navigation system for total knee replacement.
Pitto RP; Graydon AJ; Bradley L; Malak SF; Walker CG; Anderson IA
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 May; 88(5):601-5. PubMed ID: 16645104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Custom-fit total knee arthroplasty (OtisKnee) results in malalignment.
Klatt BA; Goyal N; Austin MS; Hozack WJ
J Arthroplasty; 2008 Jan; 23(1):26-9. PubMed ID: 18165024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of femoral rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty using computer assisted navigation.
Restrepo C; Hozack WJ; Orozco F; Parvizi J
Comput Aided Surg; 2008 May; 13(3):167-72. PubMed ID: 18432416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
