170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23451752)
1. Validation and optimization of criteria for manual smear review following automated blood cell analysis in a large university hospital.
Pratumvinit B; Wongkrajang P; Reesukumal K; Klinbua C; Niamjoy P
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2013 Mar; 137(3):408-14. PubMed ID: 23451752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The international consensus group for hematology review: suggested criteria for action following automated CBC and WBC differential analysis.
Barnes PW; McFadden SL; Machin SJ; Simson E;
Lab Hematol; 2005; 11(2):83-90. PubMed ID: 16024331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Optimization of laboratory workflow in clinical hematology laboratory with reduced manual slide review: comparison between Sysmex XE-2100 and ABX Pentra DX120.
Hur M; Cho JH; Kim H; Hong MH; Moon HW; Yun YM; Kim JQ
Int J Lab Hematol; 2011 Aug; 33(4):434-40. PubMed ID: 21418541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison study of the rates of manual peripheral blood smear review from 3 automated hematology analyzers, Unicel DxH 800, ADVIA 2120i, and XE 2100, using international consensus group guidelines.
Kim SJ; Kim Y; Shin S; Song J; Choi JR
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2012 Nov; 136(11):1408-13. PubMed ID: 23106587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Development of the personalized criteria for microscopic review following four different series of hematology analyzer in a Chinese large scale hospital.
Cui W; Wu W; Wang X; Wang G; Hao YY; Chen Y; Luo D; Shou WL; Zhang S; Xiang XF; Si YZ; Chen Q; Cai H; Li T; Shen H; Shang K; Zhang YQ
Chin Med J (Engl); 2010 Nov; 123(22):3231-7. PubMed ID: 21163121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Establishment of improved review criteria for hematology analyzers in cancer hospitals.
Wang X; Wang X; Ge P; Zhao X; Chen C; Hu S; Ren L
J Clin Lab Anal; 2021 Feb; 35(2):e23638. PubMed ID: 33314392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of criteria of manual blood smear review following automated complete blood counts in a large university hospital.
Comar SR; Malvezzi M; Pasquini R
Rev Bras Hematol Hemoter; 2017; 39(4):306-317. PubMed ID: 29150102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Automated five-part white blood cell differential counts. Efficiency of software-generated white blood cell suspect flags of the hematology analyzers Sysmex SE-9000, Sysmex NE-8000, and Coulter STKS.
Thalhammer-Scherrer R; Knöbl P; Korninger L; Schwarzinger I
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Jun; 121(6):573-7. PubMed ID: 9199621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effectiveness of the International Consensus Group criteria for manual peripheral smear review.
Palur K; Arakeri SU
Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2018; 61(3):360-365. PubMed ID: 30004055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Hematology laboratory standardization: a plan for harmonization in Asia.
Bunyaratvej A; Tatsumi N; Funahara Y
Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health; 1999; 30 Suppl 3():182-4. PubMed ID: 10926281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparing the performance of three panels rules of blood smear review criteria on an Italian multicenter evaluation.
Pipitone S; Germagnoli L; Da Rin G; Di Fabio A; Fanelli A; Fiorini F; Francione S; Marini A; Papa A; Benegiamo A; Lari T; Siviero F; Lorubbio M; Borin M; Seghezzi M; Ciardelli ML; Dima F; Gioia M; Buoro S
Int J Lab Hematol; 2017 Dec; 39(6):645-652. PubMed ID: 28975714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Refining peripheral blood smear review rules for neonatal inpatients in a South African academic laboratory.
Vaughan J; Alli N; Mannaru K; Sedick Q
Int J Lab Hematol; 2016 Aug; 38(4):347-51. PubMed ID: 27087063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Differences in detecting blasts between ADVIA 2120 and Beckman-Coulter LH750 hematology analyzers.
Shelat SG; Canfield W; Shibutani S
Int J Lab Hematol; 2010 Feb; 32(1 Pt 2):113-6. PubMed ID: 20447241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Combined hematologic parameters to optimize review criteria on XE-5000.
Fu L; Guo X; Li X; Peng L; Luo H; Xu Y; Zeng F
Int J Lab Hematol; 2020 Apr; 42(2):152-161. PubMed ID: 31820568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Workflow improvement and impact of the new Beckman Coulter LH 1500 high throughput automated hematology workcell.
La Porta AD; Bowden AS; Barr S
Lab Hematol; 2004; 10(2):95-101. PubMed ID: 15224765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Standardization Committee for Haematology. External Quality Assurance Program for General Hematology. Evaluation of the 1994 results].
Gutiérrez G; Jou JM; Carlos Reverter J; Martínez-Brotons F; Domingo A; Antonio Iriarte J; Remacha A; Rey J; Vives Corrons JL
Sangre (Barc); 1996 Apr; 41(2):115-23. PubMed ID: 9045351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Elimination of instrument-driven reflex manual differential leukocyte counts. Optimization of manual blood smear review criteria in a high-volume automated hematology laboratory.
Lantis KL; Harris RJ; Davis G; Renner N; Finn WG
Am J Clin Pathol; 2003 May; 119(5):656-62. PubMed ID: 12760283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of five automated hematology analyzers in a university hospital setting: Abbott Cell-Dyn Sapphire, Beckman Coulter DxH 800, Siemens Advia 2120i, Sysmex XE-5000, and Sysmex XN-2000.
Bruegel M; Nagel D; Funk M; Fuhrmann P; Zander J; Teupser D
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2015 Jun; 53(7):1057-71. PubMed ID: 25720071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Laboratory productivity and the rate of manual peripheral blood smear review: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 95,141 complete blood count determinations performed in 263 institutions.
Novis DA; Walsh M; Wilkinson D; St Louis M; Ben-Ezra J
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2006 May; 130(5):596-601. PubMed ID: 16683868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The rate of manual peripheral blood smear reviews in outpatients.
Froom P; Havis R; Barak M
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2009; 47(11):1401-5. PubMed ID: 19778287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
