113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23451840)
21. Colonoscopic screening of asymptomatic first-degree relatives of colorectal cancer patients.
Croitoru L; Trifan A; Maxim MR; Girleanu I; Hulub A; Dimache M; Stanciu C
Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi; 2010; 114(3):683-6. PubMed ID: 21235115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Confirming a diagnosis of hereditary colorectal cancer: the impact of a Familial Bowel Cancer Registry in New Zealand.
James P; Parry S; Arnold J; Winship I
N Z Med J; 2006 Sep; 119(1242):U2168. PubMed ID: 16998569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Screening colonoscopy and fecal occult blood testing practice patterns: a population-based survey of gastroenterologists.
Rossi F; Sosa JA; Aslanian HR
J Clin Gastroenterol; 2008; 42(10):1089-94. PubMed ID: 18936643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. An evaluation of colonoscopy surveillance guidelines: are we actually adhering to the guidelines?
Walker AS; Nelson DW; Fowler JJ; Causey MW; Quade S; Johnson EK; Maykel JA; Steele SR
Am J Surg; 2013 May; 205(5):618-22; discussion 622. PubMed ID: 23592173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Colorectal cancer screening among first-degree relatives of colorectal cancer patients: benefits and barriers.
Mack LA; Cook LS; Temple WJ; Carlson LE; Hilsden RJ; Paolucci EO
Ann Surg Oncol; 2009 Aug; 16(8):2092-100. PubMed ID: 19479307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. High uptake of colonoscopy in first-degree relatives of patients with colorectal cancer in a healthcare region: a population-based, prospective study.
Armelao F; Orlandi PG; Tasini E; Franceschini G; Franch R; Paternolli C; de Pretis G
Endoscopy; 2010 Jan; 42(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 20066589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Perceived risks and benefits of surveillance colonoscopy in people undergoing surveillance for family history of colorectal cancer.
Tarr GP; Smith RA; John RA; Crowley AP; Kok JB; Lee HN; Mustafa MH; Sii KM; Son SE; Weaver LJ; Cameron C; Dockerty JD; Murray IA; Schultz M
N Z Med J; 2013 Sep; 126(1382):58-69. PubMed ID: 24154770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Colonoscopy surveillance of individuals at risk of familial colorectal cancer.
Bradshaw N; Holloway S; Penman I; Dunlop MG; Porteous ME
Gut; 2003 Dec; 52(12):1748-51. PubMed ID: 14633955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Challenges in the diagnosis and management of Lynch Syndrome in an Indigenous family living in a remote West Australian community.
Schofield L; Goldblatt J; Iacopetta B
Rural Remote Health; 2011; 11(4):1836. PubMed ID: 22188021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Estimation of the familial relative risk of cancer by site from a French population based family study on colorectal cancer (CCREF study).
Andrieu N; Launoy G; Guillois R; Ory-Paoletti C; Gignoux M
Gut; 2004 Sep; 53(9):1322-8. PubMed ID: 15306593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Colorectal cancer screening practise is influenced by ethnicity of medical practitioner and patient.
Koo JH; You MY; Liu K; Athureliya MD; Tang CW; Redmond DM; Connor SJ; Leong RW
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2012 Feb; 27(2):390-6. PubMed ID: 21793910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Barriers to colorectal cancer screening: inadequate knowledge by physicians.
Gennarelli M; Jandorf L; Cromwell C; Valdimarsdottir H; Redd W; Itzkowitz S
Mt Sinai J Med; 2005 Jan; 72(1):36-44. PubMed ID: 15682261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Use of a patient consultation questionnaire and weighted numerical scoring system for the prediction of colorectal cancer and other colorectal pathology in symptomatic patients: a prospective cohort validation study of a Welsh population.
Ballal MS; Selvachandran SN; Maw A
Colorectal Dis; 2010 May; 12(5):407-14. PubMed ID: 19570067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Colonoscopic screening in first-degree relatives of patients with sporadic colorectal cancer].
Scintu F; Canalis C; Capra F; D'Alia G; Giordano M; Mocci P; Pisano M; Casula G
Ann Ital Chir; 2000; 71(6):693-9. PubMed ID: 11347322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Surveillance and cost-effectiveness of colonoscopy in asymptomatic increased risk subjects of colorectal cancer: Ferrara experience].
Matarese V; Pezzoli A; Trevisani L; Boccia S; Brancaleoni M; Simone L; Feo C; Gullini S
Recenti Prog Med; 2004; 95(7-8):352-7. PubMed ID: 15303544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Management of young onset colorectal cancer: divergent practice in the East of England.
Anning L; Koo N; Neely J; Wells A; Clark SK; Miller R; Will O
Colorectal Dis; 2011 Sep; 13(9):e297-302. PubMed ID: 21689352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Evaluation of the Danish national strategy for selective use of colonoscopy in symptomatic outpatients without known risk factors for colorectal cancer.
Bjerregaard NC; Tøttrup A; Sørensen HT; Laurberg S
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2007 Feb; 42(2):228-36. PubMed ID: 17327943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Protection from colorectal cancer after colonoscopy: a population-based, case-control study.
Brenner H; Chang-Claude J; Seiler CM; Rickert A; Hoffmeister M
Ann Intern Med; 2011 Jan; 154(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 21200035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Patient and tumor characteristics may raise clinicians' awareness of familial colorectal cancer: a Norwegian population-based study.
Tranø G; Wasmuth H; Sjursen W; Vatten L
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2011 Oct; 46(10):1236-42. PubMed ID: 21679123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Prevention of colorectal cancer still not adequately accepted. Encourage early detection!].
Eickhoff A; Riemann JF
MMW Fortschr Med; 2003 Apr; 145(16):35-8, 40-1. PubMed ID: 14606400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
