191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23451988)
21. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials for the management of limited vertical height in the posterior region: short implants (5 to 8 mm) vs longer implants (> 8 mm) in vertically augmented sites.
Lee SA; Lee CT; Fu MM; Elmisalati W; Chuang SK
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(5):1085-97. PubMed ID: 25216134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Clinical outcome of root-shaped dental implants of various diameters: 5-year results.
Krennmair G; Seemann R; Schmidinger S; Ewers R; Piehslinger E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(2):357-66. PubMed ID: 20369096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Implant prosthodontic management of partially edentulous patients missing posterior teeth: the Toronto experience.
Attard NJ; Zarb GA
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Apr; 89(4):352-9. PubMed ID: 12690347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Descriptive analysis of implant and prosthodontic survival rates with fixed implant-supported rehabilitations in the edentulous maxilla.
Lambert FE; Weber HP; Susarla SM; Belser UC; Gallucci GO
J Periodontol; 2009 Aug; 80(8):1220-30. PubMed ID: 19656021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Prospective clinical evaluation of 307 single-tooth morse taper-connection implants: a multicenter study.
Mangano C; Mangano F; Piattelli A; Iezzi G; Mangano A; La Colla L
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(2):394-400. PubMed ID: 20369101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A distinguishable observation between survival and success rate outcome of hydroxyapatite-coated implants in 5-10 years in function.
Artzi Z; Carmeli G; Kozlovsky A
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Feb; 17(1):85-93. PubMed ID: 16441789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Oral rehabilitation using Camlog screw-cylinder implants with a particle-blasted and acid-etched microstructured surface. Results from a prospective study with special consideration of short implants.
Strietzel FP; Reichart PA
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):591-600. PubMed ID: 17590161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Five-year clinical evaluation of short dental implants placed in posterior areas: a retrospective study.
Anitua E; Orive G; Aguirre JJ; Andía I
J Periodontol; 2008 Jan; 79(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 18166091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Long-term retrospective evaluation of short implants in the posterior areas: clinical results after 10-12 years.
Anitua E; Piñas L; Begoña L; Orive G
J Clin Periodontol; 2014 Apr; 41(4):404-11. PubMed ID: 24354567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Turned, machined versus double-etched dental implants in vivo.
Al-Nawas B; Hangen U; Duschner H; Krummenauer F; Wagner W
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Jun; 9(2):71-8. PubMed ID: 17535330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Evaluation of the effectiveness of dental implant therapy in a practice-based network (FOCUS).
Stanford CM; Wagner W; Rodriguez Y Baena R; Norton M; McGlumphy E; Schmidt J
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(2):367-73. PubMed ID: 20369097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Implant diameter and length influence on survival: interim results during the first 2 years of function of implants by a single manufacturer.
Mijiritsky E; Mazor Z; Lorean A; Levin L
Implant Dent; 2013 Aug; 22(4):394-8. PubMed ID: 23811719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Immediate loading of tapered implants placed in postextraction sockets: retrospective analysis of the 5-year clinical outcome.
Mura P
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Aug; 14(4):565-74. PubMed ID: 20662861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Does loading time affect implant survival? A meta-analysis of 1,266 implants.
Ioannidou E; Doufexi A
J Periodontol; 2005 Aug; 76(8):1252-8. PubMed ID: 16101355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Stability, marginal bone loss and survival of standard and modified sand-blasted, acid-etched implants in bilateral edentulous spaces: a prospective 15-month evaluation.
Karabuda ZC; Abdel-Haq J; Arisan V
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Aug; 22(8):840-9. PubMed ID: 21198901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The use of short dental implants in clinical practice: literature review.
Romeo E; Bivio A; Mosca D; Scanferla M; Ghisolfi M; Storelli S
Minerva Stomatol; 2010; 59(1-2):23-31. PubMed ID: 20212407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Mini implants for definitive prosthodontic treatment: a systematic review.
Bidra AS; Almas K
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Mar; 109(3):156-64. PubMed ID: 23522364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A noninterventional study documenting use and success of implants with a new chemically modified titanium surface in daily dental practice.
Luongo G; Oteri G
J Oral Implantol; 2010; 36(4):305-14. PubMed ID: 20735267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A randomized clinical trial to evaluate and compare implants placed in augmented versus non-augmented extraction sockets: 3-year results.
Barone A; Orlando B; Cingano L; Marconcini S; Derchi G; Covani U
J Periodontol; 2012 Jul; 83(7):836-46. PubMed ID: 22141358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Short (8-mm) dental implants in the rehabilitation of partial and complete edentulism: a 3- to 14-year longitudinal study.
Romeo E; Ghisolfi M; Rozza R; Chiapasco M; Lops D
Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(6):586-92. PubMed ID: 17165298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
