502 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23452093)
1. Comparative effectiveness, costs and trends in treatment of small renal masses from 2005 to 2007.
Kowalczyk KJ; Choueiri TK; Hevelone ND; Trinh QD; Lipsitz SR; Nguyen PL; Lynch JH; Hu JC
BJU Int; 2013 Aug; 112(4):E273-80. PubMed ID: 23452093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Use of surveillance imaging following treatment of small renal masses.
Kowalczyk KJ; Harbin AC; Choueiri TK; Hevelone ND; Lipsitz SR; Trinh QD; Tina Shih YC; Hu JC
J Urol; 2013 Nov; 190(5):1680-5. PubMed ID: 23764074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The relationship of postoperative complications with in-hospital outcomes and costs after renal surgery for kidney cancer.
Kim SP; Leibovich BC; Shah ND; Weight CJ; Borah BJ; Han LC; Boorjian SA; Thompson RH
BJU Int; 2013 Apr; 111(4):580-8. PubMed ID: 22564425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cost comparison of nephron-sparing treatments for cT1a renal masses.
Castle SM; Gorbatiy V; Avallone MA; Eldefrawy A; Caulton DE; Leveillee RJ
Urol Oncol; 2013 Oct; 31(7):1327-32. PubMed ID: 22361086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. External validation of a model for tailoring the operative approach to minimally invasive partial nephrectomy.
Vricella GJ; Murray S; Boncher NA; Madi R
BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1806-10. PubMed ID: 21040363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A critical analysis of the actual role of minimally invasive surgery and active surveillance for kidney cancer.
Heuer R; Gill IS; Guazzoni G; Kirkali Z; Marberger M; Richie JP; de la Rosette JJ
Eur Urol; 2010 Feb; 57(2):223-32. PubMed ID: 19853989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Trends in the use of of nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) at an Australian tertiary referral centre: an analysis of surgical decision-making using the R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry scoring system.
Satasivam P; Rajarubendra N; Chia PH; Munshey A; Sengupta S; Bolton D
BJU Int; 2012 May; 109(9):1341-4. PubMed ID: 21951826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evolving practice patterns for the management of small renal masses in the USA.
Yang G; Villalta JD; Meng MV; Whitson JM
BJU Int; 2012 Oct; 110(8):1156-61. PubMed ID: 22372984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Higher perioperative morbidity and in-hospital mortality in patients with end-stage renal disease undergoing nephrectomy for non-metastatic kidney cancer: a population-based analysis.
Schmitges J; Trinh QD; Sun M; Hansen J; Bianchi M; Jeldres C; Perrotte P; Dahlem R; Shariat SF; Chun FK; Montorsi F; Menon M; Fisch M; Graefen M; Karakiewicz PI
BJU Int; 2012 Sep; 110(6 Pt B):E183-90. PubMed ID: 22321256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Survival after partial and radical nephrectomy for the treatment of stage T1bN0M0 renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in the USA: a propensity scoring approach.
Badalato GM; Kates M; Wisnivesky JP; Choudhury AR; McKiernan JM
BJU Int; 2012 May; 109(10):1457-62. PubMed ID: 21933334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Tumour size, tumour complexity, and surgical approach are associated with nephrectomy type in small renal cortical tumours treated electively.
Broughton GJ; Clark PE; Barocas DA; Cookson MS; Smith JA; Herrell SD; Chang SS
BJU Int; 2012 Jun; 109(11):1607-13. PubMed ID: 21939493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative financial analysis of minimally invasive surgery to open surgery for small renal tumours < or =3.5 cm: a single institutional experience.
Mouraviev V; Nosnik I; Robertson C; Albala D; Walther P; Polascik TJ
Eur Urol; 2007 Mar; 51(3):715-20; discussion 720-1. PubMed ID: 16904255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy: a matched-pair comparison of 200 patients.
Marszalek M; Meixl H; Polajnar M; Rauchenwald M; Jeschke K; Madersbacher S
Eur Urol; 2009 May; 55(5):1171-8. PubMed ID: 19232819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Active surveillance of small renal masses offers short-term oncological efficacy equivalent to radical and partial nephrectomy.
Patel N; Cranston D; Akhtar MZ; George C; Jones A; Leiblich A; Protheroe A; Sullivan M
BJU Int; 2012 Nov; 110(9):1270-5. PubMed ID: 22564495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Population-based comparative effectiveness of nephron-sparing surgery vs ablation for small renal masses.
Whitson JM; Harris CR; Meng MV
BJU Int; 2012 Nov; 110(10):1438-43; discussion 1443. PubMed ID: 22639860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Population level assessment of hospital based outcomes following laparoscopic versus open partial nephrectomy during the adoption of minimally invasive surgery.
Tan HJ; Wolf JS; Ye Z; Hafez KS; Miller DC
J Urol; 2014 May; 191(5):1231-7. PubMed ID: 24211600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Rates of open versus laparoscopic and partial versus radical nephrectomy for T1a renal cell carcinoma: a population-based evaluation.
Bianchi M; Becker A; Abdollah F; Trinh QD; Hansen J; Tian Z; Shariat SF; Perrotte P; Karakiewicz PI; Sun M
Int J Urol; 2013 Nov; 20(11):1064-71. PubMed ID: 23418921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Inpatient safety trends in laparoscopic and open nephrectomy for renal tumours.
Stroup SP; Palazzi KL; Chang DC; Ward NT; Parsons JK
BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11):1808-13. PubMed ID: 22471427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Partial nephrectomy in two patients with known T3a tumours involving the renal vein.
Kim EH; Jain S; Benway BM; Figenshau RS
BJU Int; 2012 May; 109(9):1345-8. PubMed ID: 21883846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. RENAL nephrometry score is associated with operative approach for partial nephrectomy and urine leak.
Stroup SP; Palazzi K; Kopp RP; Mehrazin R; Santomauro M; Cohen SA; Patterson AL; L'Esperance JO; Derweesh IH
Urology; 2012 Jul; 80(1):151-6. PubMed ID: 22748871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
