These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

29 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2345404)

  • 1. Artifacts in digital mammography.
    Van Ongeval C; Jacobs J; Bosmans H
    JBR-BTR; 2008; 91(6):262-3. PubMed ID: 19203002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of breast masses using digitized images versus screen-film mammography.
    Liang Z; Du X; Liu J; Yao X; Yang Y; Li K
    Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):618-22. PubMed ID: 18568552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Full-field digital mammography compared with screen-film mammography in the detection of breast cancer: rays of light through DMIST or more fog?
    Tice JA; Feldman MD
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2008 Jan; 107(2):157-65. PubMed ID: 17377840
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [The design of near infrared mammography computer-aided diagnosis system].
    Zhan CA; Feng HQ
    Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 2001 Nov; 25(6):324-7. PubMed ID: 12583262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Can the average glandular dose in routine digital mammography screening be reduced? A pilot study using revised image quality criteria.
    Hemdal B; Andersson I; Grahn A; Håkansson M; Ruschin M; Thilander-Klang A; Båth M; Börjesson S; Medin J; Tingberg A; Månsson LG; Mattsson S
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):383-8. PubMed ID: 15933142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A dynamic infrared imaging-based diagnostic process for breast cancer.
    Joro R; Lääperi AL; Dastidar P; Järvenpää R; Kuukasjärvi T; Toivonen T; Saaristo R; Soimakallio S
    Acta Radiol; 2009 Oct; 50(8):860-9. PubMed ID: 19636984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Digital mammo-radiography (DMR) in mass screening for breast cancer].
    Kido C; Endo T; Horita K
    Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 1988 May; 15(5):1665-70. PubMed ID: 3369869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Multimodality computerized diagnosis of breast lesions using mammography and sonography.
    Drukker K; Horsch K; Giger ML
    Acad Radiol; 2005 Aug; 12(8):970-9. PubMed ID: 16087091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dynamic infrared imaging in identification of breast cancer tissue with combined image processing and frequency analysis.
    Joro R; Lääperi AL; Soimakallio S; Järvenpää R; Kuukasjärvi T; Toivonen T; Saaristo R; Dastidar P
    J Med Eng Technol; 2008; 32(4):325-35. PubMed ID: 18666012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Soft-copy reading in digital mammography of mass: diagnostic performance of a 5-megapixel cathode ray tube monitor versus a 3-megapixel liquid crystal display monitor in a diagnostic setting.
    Uematsu T; Kasami M
    Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):623-9. PubMed ID: 18568553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of a novel method of noise reduction using computer-simulated mammograms.
    Tischenko O; Hoeschen C; Dance DR; Hunt RA; Maidment AD; Bakic PR
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):81-4. PubMed ID: 15933085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [A study of image processing condition of mammography using FCR (Fuji Computed Radiography)].
    Nakata M
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Apr; 49(4):454-67. PubMed ID: 2798048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Thickness correction of mammographic images by means of a global parameter model of the compressed breast.
    Snoeren PR; Karssemeijer N
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2004 Jul; 23(7):799-806. PubMed ID: 15250632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Selection of parameters for multi-objective frequency processing in CR mammography: visual evaluation of mammographic phantom images].
    Ishihara K; Ishida E; Iwanaga H; Hashida M; Sanada T
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2005 Mar; 61(3):419-25. PubMed ID: 15815561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [A trial of selective imaging for the breast mass shadow by computed radiography].
    Muramatsu Y; Anan M; Tanaka T; Matsue H; Yamada T
    Rinsho Hoshasen; 1990 Mar; 35(3):321-4. PubMed ID: 2345404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [A study of image processing in CR mammography; gradation processing].
    Muramatsu Y; Nawano S; Anan M; Hanmura K; Tanaka T; Matsue H; Yamada T
    Rinsho Hoshasen; 1990 Feb; 35(2):271-6. PubMed ID: 2325289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fusion of magnetic resonance and scintimammography images for breast cancer evaluation: a pilot study.
    Duarte GM; Cabello C; Torresan RZ; Alvarenga M; Telles GH; Bianchessi ST; Caserta N; Segala SR; de Lima Mda C; Etchebehere EC; Camargo EE; Tinois E
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Oct; 14(10):2903-10. PubMed ID: 17632758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 2.