These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23454431)

  • 1. Attention modulates sensory suppression during back movements.
    Van Hulle L; Juravle G; Spence C; Crombez G; Van Damme S
    Conscious Cogn; 2013 Jun; 22(2):420-9. PubMed ID: 23454431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Attention and suppression affect tactile perception in reach-to-grasp movements.
    Juravle G; Deubel H; Spence C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Oct; 138(2):302-10. PubMed ID: 21872190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Spatial attention modulates tactile change detection.
    Van Hulle L; Van Damme S; Spence C; Crombez G; Gallace A
    Exp Brain Res; 2013 Jan; 224(2):295-302. PubMed ID: 23109085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Tactile expectation modulates pre-stimulus beta-band oscillations in human sensorimotor cortex.
    van Ede F; Jensen O; Maris E
    Neuroimage; 2010 Jun; 51(2):867-76. PubMed ID: 20188186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Relevance-dependent modulation of tactile suppression during active, passive and pantomime reach-to-grasp movements.
    Manzone DM; Inglis JT; Franks IM; Chua R
    Behav Brain Res; 2018 Feb; 339():93-105. PubMed ID: 29162384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of chronic low back pain on tactile suppression during back movements.
    Van Damme S; Van Hulle L; Danneels L; Spence C; Crombez G
    Hum Mov Sci; 2014 Oct; 37():87-100. PubMed ID: 25128642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Lost in the move? Secondary task performance impairs tactile change detection on the body.
    Gallace A; Zeeden S; Röder B; Spence C
    Conscious Cogn; 2010 Mar; 19(1):215-29. PubMed ID: 19647451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Changes in tactile sensitivity over the time-course of a goal-directed movement.
    Juravle G; Deubel H; Tan HZ; Spence C
    Behav Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 208(2):391-401. PubMed ID: 20018212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Action preparation modulates sensory perception in unseen personal space: An electrophysiological investigation.
    Job XE; de Fockert JW; van Velzen J
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Aug; 89():445-452. PubMed ID: 27450265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of motor intention on the perception of somatosensory events: a behavioural and functional magnetic resonance imaging study.
    Jackson SR; Parkinson A; Pears SL; Nam SH
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 May; 64(5):839-54. PubMed ID: 21213193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does the sight of physical threat induce a tactile processing bias? Modality-specific attentional facilitation induced by viewing threatening pictures.
    Van Damme S; Gallace A; Spence C; Crombez G; Moseley GL
    Brain Res; 2009 Feb; 1253():100-6. PubMed ID: 19094970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Neural correlates of tactile perception during pre-, peri-, and post-movement.
    Juravle G; Heed T; Spence C; Röder B
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 May; 234(5):1293-305. PubMed ID: 26914480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Age-related loss in attention-based modulation of tactile stimuli at early stages of somatosensory processing.
    Bolton DA; Staines WR
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Jun; 50(7):1502-13. PubMed ID: 22406692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Implicit processing of tactile information: evidence from the tactile change detection paradigm.
    Pritchett D; Gallace A; Spence C
    Conscious Cogn; 2011 Sep; 20(3):534-46. PubMed ID: 21459622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Attention to somatosensory events is directly linked to the preparation for action.
    Galazky I; Schütze H; Noesselt T; Hopf JM; Heinze HJ; Schoenfeld MA
    J Neurol Sci; 2009 Apr; 279(1-2):93-8. PubMed ID: 19167729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An ERP investigation on visuotactile interactions in peripersonal and extrapersonal space: evidence for the spatial rule.
    Sambo CF; Forster B
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Aug; 21(8):1550-9. PubMed ID: 18767919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Where are my hands? Influence of limb posture on tactile extinction.
    Auclair L; Barra J; Raibaut P
    Neuropsychology; 2012 May; 26(3):323-33. PubMed ID: 22468821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Gating of spontaneous somatic sensations by movement.
    Beaudoin R; Michael GA
    Somatosens Mot Res; 2014 Sep; 31(3):111-21. PubMed ID: 24593828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Trying to fix a painful problem: the impact of pain control attempts on the attentional prioritization of a threatened body location.
    Durnez W; Van Damme S
    J Pain; 2015 Feb; 16(2):135-43. PubMed ID: 25463700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The attentive homunculus: ERP evidence for somatotopic allocation of attention in tactile search.
    Forster B; Tziraki M; Jones A
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Apr; 84():158-66. PubMed ID: 26898371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.