127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23454499)
1. Robotic surgical staging for endometrial and cervical cancers in medically ill patients.
Siesto G; Ornaghi S; Iedà N; Vitobello D
Gynecol Oncol; 2013 Jun; 129(3):593-7. PubMed ID: 23454499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Same-day discharge is feasible and safe in patients undergoing minimally invasive staging for gynecologic malignancies.
Penner KR; Fleming ND; Barlavi L; Axtell AE; Lentz SE
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 212(2):186.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25132462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison between 155 cases of robotic vs. 150 cases of open surgical staging for endometrial cancer.
ElSahwi KS; Hooper C; De Leon MC; Gallo TN; Ratner E; Silasi DA; Santin AD; Schwartz PE; Rutherford TJ; Azodi M
Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Feb; 124(2):260-4. PubMed ID: 22036203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Short- and long-term morbidity and outcomes after robotic surgery for comprehensive endometrial cancer staging.
Backes FJ; Brudie LA; Farrell MR; Ahmad S; Finkler NJ; Bigsby GE; O'Malley D; Cohn DE; Holloway RW; Fowler JM
Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Jun; 125(3):546-51. PubMed ID: 22387522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. What is the optimal minimally invasive surgical procedure for endometrial cancer staging in the obese and morbidly obese woman?
Gehrig PA; Cantrell LA; Shafer A; Abaid LN; Mendivil A; Boggess JF
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Oct; 111(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 18694588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A cohort study evaluating robotic versus laparotomy surgical outcomes of obese women with endometrial carcinoma.
Subramaniam A; Kim KH; Bryant SA; Zhang B; Sikes C; Kimball KJ; Kilgore LC; Huh WK; Straughn JM; Alvarez RD
Gynecol Oncol; 2011 Sep; 122(3):604-7. PubMed ID: 21658752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A cost analysis of postoperative management in endometrial cancer patients treated by robotics versus laparoscopic approach.
Martino MA; Shubella J; Thomas MB; Morcrette RM; Schindler J; Williams S; Boulay R
Gynecol Oncol; 2011 Dec; 123(3):528-31. PubMed ID: 21968341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of robotic-assisted surgery outcomes with laparotomy for endometrial cancer staging in Turkey.
Göçmen A; Sanlıkan F; Uçar MG
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2010 Nov; 282(5):539-45. PubMed ID: 20652285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Minimally invasive comprehensive surgical staging for endometrial cancer: Robotics or laparoscopy?
Seamon LG; Cohn DE; Henretta MS; Kim KH; Carlson MJ; Phillips GS; Fowler JM
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Apr; 113(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 19168206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Robotically assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer.
DeNardis SA; Holloway RW; Bigsby GE; Pikaart DP; Ahmad S; Finkler NJ
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Dec; 111(3):412-7. PubMed ID: 18834620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Robotic surgical staging for obese patients with endometrial cancer.
Tang KY; Gardiner SK; Gould C; Osmundsen B; Collins M; Winter WE
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Jun; 206(6):513.e1-6. PubMed ID: 22409959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Robotic radical parametrectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy: our experience and review of the literature.
Vitobello D; Siesto G; Bulletti C; Accardi A; Iedà N
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2012 Jun; 38(6):548-54. PubMed ID: 22425283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques.
Bell MC; Torgerson J; Seshadri-Kreaden U; Suttle AW; Hunt S
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Dec; 111(3):407-11. PubMed ID: 18829091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) in gynecologic oncology: technique and initial report.
Fader AN; Escobar PF
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Aug; 114(2):157-61. PubMed ID: 19481243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology: program initiation and outcomes after the first year with comparison with laparotomy for endometrial cancer staging.
Veljovich DS; Paley PJ; Drescher CW; Everett EN; Shah C; Peters WA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jun; 198(6):679.e1-9; discussion 679.e9-10. PubMed ID: 18538151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology: impact on fellowship training.
Hoekstra AV; Morgan JM; Lurain JR; Buttin BM; Singh DK; Schink JC; Lowe MP
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Aug; 114(2):168-72. PubMed ID: 19446869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Safety and feasibility of robotic radical trachelectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer.
Ramirez PT; Schmeler KM; Malpica A; Soliman PT
Gynecol Oncol; 2010 Mar; 116(3):512-5. PubMed ID: 19944451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Robot-assisted staging using three robotic arms for endometrial cancer: comparison to laparoscopy and laparotomy at a single institution.
Jung YW; Lee DW; Kim SW; Nam EJ; Kim JH; Kim JW; Kim YT
J Surg Oncol; 2010 Feb; 101(2):116-21. PubMed ID: 19902479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative outcomes in older and younger women undergoing laparotomy or robotic surgical staging for endometrial cancer.
Guy MS; Sheeder J; Behbakht K; Wright JD; Guntupalli SR
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Mar; 214(3):350.e1-350.e10. PubMed ID: 26433173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Robotic surgery: changing the surgical approach for endometrial cancer in a referral cancer center.
Peiretti M; Zanagnolo V; Bocciolone L; Landoni F; Colombo N; Minig L; Sanguineti F; Maggioni A
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2009; 16(4):427-31. PubMed ID: 19467930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
