These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

63 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23454820)

  • 21. Probabilistic exposure assessment model to estimate aseptic-UHT product failure rate.
    Pujol L; Albert I; Magras C; Johnson NB; Membré JM
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2015 Jan; 192():124-41. PubMed ID: 25440556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Added value of experts' knowledge to improve a quantitative microbial exposure assessment model--Application to aseptic-UHT food products.
    Pujol L; Johnson NB; Magras C; Albert I; Membré JM
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2015 Oct; 211():6-17. PubMed ID: 26143288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Estimation and evaluation of management options to control and/or reduce the risk of not complying with commercial sterility.
    Pujol L; Albert I; Magras C; Johnson NB; Membré JM
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2015 Nov; 213():124-9. PubMed ID: 26032815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Quantitative microbiological risk assessment in food industry: Theory and practical application.
    Membré JM; Boué G
    Food Res Int; 2018 Apr; 106():1132-1139. PubMed ID: 29579908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Studying the effects of POs and MCs on the Salmonella ALOP with a quantitative risk assessment model for beef production.
    Tuominen P; Ranta J; Maijala R
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2007 Aug; 118(1):35-51. PubMed ID: 17658191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Potential application of quantitative microbiological risk assessment techniques to an aseptic-UHT process in the food industry.
    Pujol L; Albert I; Johnson NB; Membré JM
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2013 Apr; 162(3):283-96. PubMed ID: 23454820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. UHT milk: production, quality, and economics.
    Kosaric N; Kitchen B; Panchal CJ; Sheppard JD; Kennedy K; Sargant A
    Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr; 1981; 14(2):153-99. PubMed ID: 7011686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Quantitative risk modeling in aseptic manufacture.
    Tidswell EC; McGarvey B
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2006; 60(5):267-83. PubMed ID: 17089696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The challenge of defining risk-based metrics to improve food safety: inputs from the BASELINE project.
    Manfreda G; De Cesare A
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2014 Aug; 184():2-7. PubMed ID: 24507945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Beyond QMRA: Modelling microbial health risk as a complex system using Bayesian networks.
    Beaudequin D; Harden F; Roiko A; Stratton H; Lemckert C; Mengersen K
    Environ Int; 2015 Jul; 80():8-18. PubMed ID: 25827265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Heat transfer and lethality considerations in aseptic processing of liquid/particle mixtures: a review.
    Ramaswamy HS; Awuah GB; Simpson BK
    Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr; 1997 Apr; 37(3):253-86. PubMed ID: 9143820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [The hygiene of refrigerated and frozen foods].
    Sinell HJ
    Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg B Umwelthyg Krankenhaushyg Arbeitshyg Prav Med; 1989 Apr; 187(4-6):533-45. PubMed ID: 2500811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The prevalence of aflatoxin M1 in milk of Middle East region: A systematic review, meta-analysis and probabilistic health risk assessment.
    Rahmani J; Alipour S; Miri A; Fakhri Y; Riahi SM; Keramati H; Moradi M; Amanidaz N; Pouya RH; Bahmani Z; Mousavi Khaneghah A
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2018 Aug; 118():653-666. PubMed ID: 29902498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. ADSA Foundation Scholar Award: Trends in culture-independent methods for assessing dairy food quality and safety: emerging metagenomic tools.
    Yeung M
    J Dairy Sci; 2012 Dec; 95(12):6831-42. PubMed ID: 23040017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Nanotechnology to the rescue: using nano-enabled approaches in microbiological food safety and quality.
    Eleftheriadou M; Pyrgiotakis G; Demokritou P
    Curr Opin Biotechnol; 2017 Apr; 44():87-93. PubMed ID: 27992831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Stability of milk proteins subjected to UHT treatments: challenges and future perspectives.
    de Souza AB; Stephani R; Tavares GM
    Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr; 2023 Aug; ():1-11. PubMed ID: 37632425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Probabilistic models for food-borne disease risk assessment.
    Trevisani M; Rosmini R
    Vet Res Commun; 2005 Aug; 29 Suppl 2():107-12. PubMed ID: 16244934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Increasing Patient Safety by Closing the Sterile Production Gap-Part 2. Implementation.
    Agalloco JP
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2017; 71(4):269-273. PubMed ID: 28089965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.