213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23455576)
1. Amalgam and ART restorations in children: a controlled clinical trial.
de Amorim RG; Leal SC; Mulder J; Creugers NH; Frencken JE
Clin Oral Investig; 2014 Jan; 18(1):117-24. PubMed ID: 23455576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Is high-viscosity glass-ionomer-cement a successor to amalgam for treating primary molars?
Hilgert LA; de Amorim RG; Leal SC; Mulder J; Creugers NH; Frencken JE
Dent Mater; 2014 Oct; 30(10):1172-8. PubMed ID: 25132283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Six-year success rates of occlusal amalgam and glass-ionomer restorations placed using three minimal intervention approaches.
Mandari GJ; Frencken JE; van't Hof MA
Caries Res; 2003; 37(4):246-53. PubMed ID: 12771499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A study on the survival of primary molars with intact and with defective restorations.
Hilgert LA; Frencken JE; de Amorim RG; Mulder J; Leal SC
Int J Paediatr Dent; 2016 Sep; 26(5):383-90. PubMed ID: 26567086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effectiveness of glass-ionomer (ART) and amalgam restorations in the deciduous dentition: results after 3 years.
Taifour D; Frencken JE; Beiruti N; van 't Hof MA; Truin GJ
Caries Res; 2002; 36(6):437-44. PubMed ID: 12459617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Replacing amalgam with a high-viscosity glass-ionomer in restoring primary teeth: A cost-effectiveness study in Brasilia, Brazil.
Goldman A; Frencken JE; De Amorim RG; Leal SC
J Dent; 2018 Mar; 70():80-86. PubMed ID: 29289729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effectiveness of three minimal intervention approaches for managing dental caries: survival of restorations after 2 years.
Mandari GJ; Truin GJ; van't Hof MA; Frencken JE
Caries Res; 2001; 35(2):90-4. PubMed ID: 11275667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. 2-year survival and cost analysis of occlusoproximal ART restorations using encapsulated glass ionomer cement in primary molars: a randomized controlled trial.
Garbim JR; Saihara CS; Olegário IC; Hesse D; Araujo MP; Bonifácio CC; Braga MM; Raggio DP
BMC Oral Health; 2024 Jun; 24(1):647. PubMed ID: 38824540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effectiveness of ART and traditional amalgam approach in restoring single-surface cavities in posterior teeth of permanent dentitions in school children after 6.3 years.
Frencken JE; van't Hof MA; Taifour D; Al-Zaher I
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2007 Jun; 35(3):207-14. PubMed ID: 17518967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Eight-year study on conventional glass ionomer and amalgam restorations in primary teeth.
Qvist V; Laurberg L; Poulsen A; Teglers PT
Acta Odontol Scand; 2004 Feb; 62(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 15124781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Longevity and cariostatic effects of everyday conventional glass-ionomer and amalgam restorations in primary teeth: three-year results.
Qvist V; Laurberg L; Poulsen A; Teglers PT
J Dent Res; 1997 Jul; 76(7):1387-96. PubMed ID: 9207772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Silver diamine fluoride modified atraumatic restorative treatment compared to conventional restorative technique on carious primary molars-A randomized controlled trial.
Bansal K; Shamoo A; Mani K; K PD; Verma A; Mathur VP; Tewari N
J Dent; 2023 Nov; 138():104698. PubMed ID: 37704105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Does low-cost GIC have the same survival rate as high-viscosity GIC in atraumatic restorative treatments? A RCT.
Moura MS; Sousa GP; Brito MHSF; Silva MCC; Lima MDM; Moura LFAD; Lima CCB
Braz Oral Res; 2020; 33():e125. PubMed ID: 31994598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dental fillings for the treatment of caries in the primary dentition.
Yengopal V; Harneker SY; Patel N; Siegfried N
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2009 Apr; (2):CD004483. PubMed ID: 19370602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A study of primary teeth restored by intracoronal restorations in children participating in an undergraduate teaching programme at Cork University Dental School and Hospital, Ireland.
Hurley E; Da Mata C; Stewart C; Kinirons M
Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2015 Mar; 16(1):78-82. PubMed ID: 25793959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional cavity preparations for glass-ionomer restorations in primary molars: one-year results.
Yip HK; Smales RJ; Yu C; Gao XJ; Deng DM
Quintessence Int; 2002 Jan; 33(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 11887531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Low-cost GICs reduce survival rate in occlusal ART restorations in primary molars after one year: A RCT.
Olegário IC; Pacheco AL; de Araújo MP; Ladewig NM; Bonifácio CC; Imparato JC; Raggio DP
J Dent; 2017 Feb; 57():45-50. PubMed ID: 27956016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Atraumatic restorative treatment (ART): a three-year community field trial in Thailand--survival of one-surface restorations in the permanent dentition.
Phantumvanit P; Songpaisan Y; Pilot T; Frencken JE
J Public Health Dent; 1996; 56(3 Spec No):141-5; discussion 161-3. PubMed ID: 8915959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Is it worth using low-cost glass ionomer cements for occlusal ART restorations in primary molars? 2-year survival and cost analysis of a Randomized clinical trial.
Olegário IC; Ladewig NM; Hesse D; Bonifácio CC; Braga MM; Imparato JCP; Mendes FM; Raggio DP
J Dent; 2020 Oct; 101():103446. PubMed ID: 32758684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation and comparison of silorane resin composite to glass ionomer in occluso-proximal restorations of primary molars: A randomized controlled trial.
Maru VP; Kulkarni P; Chauhan R; Bapat SS
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2022; 40(3):281-287. PubMed ID: 36260469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
