BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23456522)

  • 1. Radiation exposure to critical organs in panoramic dental examination.
    Bahreyni Toossi MT; Akbari F; Bayani Roodi S
    Acta Med Iran; 2012; 50(12):809-13. PubMed ID: 23456522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Doses in eye lens, thyroid, salivary glands, mammary glands, and gonads, due to radiation scattered in dental orthopantomography.
    Campillo-Rivera GE; Vázquez-Bañuelos J; García-Duran Á; Escalona-Llaguno MI; Arteaga MV; Vega-Carrillo HR
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2019 Apr; 146():57-60. PubMed ID: 30753985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Absorbed radiation doses during tomographic examinations in dental implant planning: a study in humans.
    Zenóbio EG; Zenóbio MA; Nogueira MS; Silva TA; Shibli JA
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Jun; 14(3):366-72. PubMed ID: 20491821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Radiation exposure of radiation-sensitive risk organs--ocular lens, parotid gland, thyroid gland--in dacryocystography and therapy].
    Wilhelm K; Krämer S; Textor J; Ewen K; Schüller H; Schild H
    Rofo; 1998 Mar; 168(3):270-4. PubMed ID: 9551114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Absorbed doses for patients undergoing panoramic radiography, cephalometric radiography and CBCT.
    Wrzesień M; Olszewski J
    Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 2017 Jul; 30(5):705-713. PubMed ID: 28584324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Radiation doses in examination of lower third molars with computed tomography and conventional radiography.
    Ohman A; Kull L; Andersson J; Flygare L
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Dec; 37(8):445-52. PubMed ID: 19033429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of radiation levels from computed tomography and conventional dental radiographs.
    Ngan DC; Kharbanda OP; Geenty JP; Darendeliler MA
    Aust Orthod J; 2003 Nov; 19(2):67-75. PubMed ID: 14703331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dosimetry of digital panoramic imaging. Part II: Occupational exposure.
    Gijbels F; Jacobs R; Debaveye D; Bogaerts R; Verlinden S; Sanderink G
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2005 May; 34(3):150-3. PubMed ID: 15897285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Absorbed doses to critical organs from full mouth dental radiography].
    Zhang G; Yasuhiko O; Hidegiko Y
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1999 Jan; 34(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 11776538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Absorbed organ and effective doses from digital intra-oral and panoramic radiography applying the ICRP 103 recommendations for effective dose estimations.
    Granlund C; Thilander-Klang A; Ylhan B; Lofthag-Hansen S; Ekestubbe A
    Br J Radiol; 2016 Oct; 89(1066):20151052. PubMed ID: 27452261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Organ doses and subjective image quality of indirect digital panoramic radiography.
    Gijbels F; Sanderink G; Bou Serhal C; Pauwels H; Jacobs R
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Nov; 30(6):308-13. PubMed ID: 11641728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Absorbed doses modified by exposure settings with rotational panoramic radiography.
    Hayakawa Y; Kobayashi N; Kousuge Y; Fujimori H; Kuroyanagi K
    Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 1994 Aug; 35(3):121-5. PubMed ID: 8620589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dosimetry of a cone-beam computed tomography machine compared with a digital x-ray machine in orthodontic imaging.
    Grünheid T; Kolbeck Schieck JR; Pliska BT; Ahmad M; Larson BE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Apr; 141(4):436-43. PubMed ID: 22464525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of the effective dose from scanography with periapical radiography.
    Gijbels F; Jacobs R; Sanderink G; De Smet E; Nowak B; Van Dam J; Van Steenberghe D
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 May; 31(3):159-63. PubMed ID: 12058262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Radiation dose reduction in direct digital panoramic radiography.
    Gavala S; Donta C; Tsiklakis K; Boziari A; Kamenopoulou V; Stamatakis HC
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Jul; 71(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 18448296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dosimetry of digital panoramic imaging. Part I: Patient exposure.
    Gijbels F; Jacobs R; Bogaerts R; Debaveye D; Verlinden S; Sanderink G
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2005 May; 34(3):145-9. PubMed ID: 15897284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Orthodontic radiographic procedures--how safe are they?
    Buch B; Fensham R
    SADJ; 2003 Feb; 58(1):6-10. PubMed ID: 12705098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Dosimetric evaluations in dental radiology: comparison of the digital system and the conventional system].
    Blanc M; Nessi R; Paruccini N; Castellana L
    Radiol Med; 1995 Mar; 89(3):319-23. PubMed ID: 7754128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. OSL dosimeters for dental panoramic radiography.
    Gutiérrez-Marquez JG; Avalos-Piña LY; López-Valencia A; Palacios-Pérez LL; Vega-Carrillo HR; Rivera-Montalvo T
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2018 Dec; 142():32-37. PubMed ID: 30248586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of adult and child radiation equivalent doses from 2 dental cone-beam computed tomography units.
    Al Najjar A; Colosi D; Dauer LT; Prins R; Patchell G; Branets I; Goren AD; Faber RD
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Jun; 143(6):784-92. PubMed ID: 23726328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.