These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2345688)

  • 21. S-R compatibility between response position and destination of apparent motion: evidence of the detection of affordances.
    Michaels CF
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1988 May; 14(2):231-40. PubMed ID: 2967878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Geometrical illusions can affect time-to-contact estimation and mimed prehension.
    DeLucia PR; Tresilian JR; Meyer LE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2000 Apr; 26(2):552-67. PubMed ID: 10811162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Pattern orientation, not motion, determines the two-dimensional tilt illusion.
    Johnstone S; Wenderoth P
    Perception; 1989; 18(6):729-37. PubMed ID: 2628924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Illusory temporal order for stimuli at different depth positions.
    Ichikawa M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Apr; 71(3):578-93. PubMed ID: 19304648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The vista paradox: a natural visual illusion.
    Walker JT; Rupich RC; Powell JL
    Percept Psychophys; 1989 Jan; 45(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 2913569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Visual memory for moving scenes.
    DeLucia PR; Maldia MM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Feb; 59(2):340-60. PubMed ID: 16618638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A Simon effect induced by induced moton and location: evidence for a direct linkage of cognitive and motor maps.
    Kerzel D; Hommel B; Bekkering H
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Jul; 63(5):862-74. PubMed ID: 11521852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Low spatial frequencies dominate apparent motion.
    Ramachandran VS; Ginsburg AP; Anstis SM
    Perception; 1983; 12(4):457-61. PubMed ID: 6672741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A spatial gradient of acceleration and temporal extension underlies three illusions of motion.
    Schmidt WC; Klein RM
    Perception; 1997; 26(7):857-74. PubMed ID: 9509139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Moving shadows contribute to the corridor illusion in a chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes).
    Imura T; Tomonaga M
    J Comp Psychol; 2009 Aug; 123(3):280-6. PubMed ID: 19685969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A stereo illusion induced by binocularly presented gratings: effects of number of eyes stimulated, spatial frequency, orientation, field size, and viewing distance.
    Odom JV; Chao GM
    Percept Psychophys; 1987 Aug; 42(2):140-9. PubMed ID: 3627934
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The effect of two-dimensional and three-dimensional distance on apparent motion.
    Mutch K; Smith IM; Yonas A
    Perception; 1983; 12(3):305-12. PubMed ID: 6669456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The spacing illusion: a spatial aperture problem?
    Mather G; O'Halloran A; Anstis S
    Perception; 1991; 20(3):387-92. PubMed ID: 1762881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Representation of spatial structure in reaching to a visual target.
    Cook M; Griffiths K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1991 Nov; 17(4):1041-56. PubMed ID: 1837296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Influence of the Poggendorff illusion on manual pointing.
    Predebon J
    Percept Mot Skills; 2004 Feb; 98(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 15058865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The detection of real and apparent concomitant rotation in a three-dimensional cube: implications for perceptual interactions.
    Peterson MA; Shyi GC
    Percept Psychophys; 1988 Jul; 44(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 3405727
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Motion signals bias localization judgments: a unified explanation for the flash-lag, flash-drag, flash-jump, and Frohlich illusions.
    Eagleman DM; Sejnowski TJ
    J Vis; 2007 Mar; 7(4):3. PubMed ID: 17461687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A new motion illusion.
    Schulman PH
    Perception; 1979; 8(6):659-64. PubMed ID: 530807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effects of self-motion on attention in real 3D space.
    Kimura T; Miura T; Doi S; Yamamoto Y
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Jul; 131(3):194-201. PubMed ID: 19524213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Apparent distance reduction with moving stimuli (Tandem Effect): evidence for an attention-shifting model.
    Müsseler J; Neumann O
    Psychol Res; 1992; 54(4):246-66. PubMed ID: 1494610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.