These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
447 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23457061)
1. A comparison of bootstrap approaches for estimating uncertainty of parameters in linear mixed-effects models. Thai HT; Mentré F; Holford NH; Veyrat-Follet C; Comets E Pharm Stat; 2013; 12(3):129-40. PubMed ID: 23457061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Multilevel bootstrap analysis with assumptions violated. Vallejo Seco G; Ato García M; Fernández García MP; Livacic Rojas PE Psicothema; 2013; 25(4):520-8. PubMed ID: 24124787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of bootstrap methods for estimating uncertainty of parameters in nonlinear mixed-effects models: a simulation study in population pharmacokinetics. Thai HT; Mentré F; Holford NH; Veyrat-Follet C; Comets E J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2014 Feb; 41(1):15-33. PubMed ID: 24317870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of statistical methods for clustered data analysis with Gaussian error. Feng Z; McLerran D; Grizzle J Stat Med; 1996 Aug; 15(16):1793-806. PubMed ID: 8870161 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Extended information criterion (EIC) approach for linear mixed effects models under restricted maximum likelihood (REML) estimation. Yafune A; Funatogawa T; Ishiguro M Stat Med; 2005 Nov; 24(22):3417-29. PubMed ID: 16237658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Non-parametric bootstrap confidence intervals for the intraclass correlation coefficient. Ukoumunne OC; Davison AC; Gulliford MC; Chinn S Stat Med; 2003 Dec; 22(24):3805-21. PubMed ID: 14673940 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Nonparametric confidence intervals for Tmax in sequence-stratified crossover studies. Willavize SA; Morgenthien EA Pharm Stat; 2008; 7(1):9-19. PubMed ID: 17256803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Multivariate meta-analysis: a robust approach based on the theory of U-statistic. Ma Y; Mazumdar M Stat Med; 2011 Oct; 30(24):2911-29. PubMed ID: 21830230 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessing the uncertainty in QUANTEC's dose-response relation of lung and spinal cord with a bootstrap analysis. Wedenberg M Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Nov; 87(4):795-801. PubMed ID: 23953634 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The use of bootstrap methods for analysing Health-Related Quality of Life outcomes (particularly the SF-36). Walters SJ; Campbell MJ Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2004 Dec; 2():70. PubMed ID: 15588308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Smooth bootstrap methods for analysis of longitudinal data. Li Y; Wang YG Stat Med; 2008 Mar; 27(7):937-53. PubMed ID: 17701950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Weighted nonparametric maximum likelihood estimate of a mixing distribution in nonrandomized clinical trials. Liu C; Xie J; Zhang Y Stat Med; 2007 Dec; 26(29):5303-19. PubMed ID: 17497612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The use of bootstrap methods for estimating sample size and analysing health-related quality of life outcomes. Walters SJ; Campbell MJ Stat Med; 2005 Apr; 24(7):1075-102. PubMed ID: 15570625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The bayesian bias correction method of the first-order approximation of nonlinear mixed-effects models for population pharmacokinetics. Funatogawa T; Funatogawa I J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(3):381-92. PubMed ID: 17479388 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Estimation of covariate effects in generalized linear mixed models with a misspecified distribution of random intercepts and slopes. Neuhaus JM; McCulloch CE; Boylan R Stat Med; 2013 Jun; 32(14):2419-29. PubMed ID: 23203817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quantification of variability and uncertainty for censored data sets and application to air toxic emission factors. Zhao Y; Frey HC Risk Anal; 2004 Aug; 24(4):1019-34. PubMed ID: 15357825 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Longitudinal and repeated cross-sectional cluster-randomization designs using mixed effects regression for binary outcomes: bias and coverage of frequentist and Bayesian methods. Localio AR; Berlin JA; Have TR Stat Med; 2006 Aug; 25(16):2720-36. PubMed ID: 16345043 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of bootstrap methods and an adjusted bootstrap approach for estimating the prediction error in microarray classification. Jiang W; Simon R Stat Med; 2007 Dec; 26(29):5320-34. PubMed ID: 17624926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Testing for misspecification in generalized linear mixed models. Abad AA; Litière S; Molenberghs G Biostatistics; 2010 Oct; 11(4):771-86. PubMed ID: 20407039 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]