136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23457815)
1. Two-year survival of glass ionomer sealants placed as part of proximal atraumatic restorative treatment restorations.
Kemoli AM; Opinya GN; van Amerongen WE
East Afr Med J; 2010 Sep; 87(9):375-81. PubMed ID: 23457815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Two-year survival rates of proximal atraumatic restorative treatment restorations in relation to glass ionomer cements and Postrestoration meals consumed.
Kemoli AM; Opinya GN; van Amerongen WE; Mwalili SM
Pediatr Dent; 2011; 33(3):246-51. PubMed ID: 21703078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Glass ionomer ART sealants in Chinese school children-6-year results.
Holmgren CJ; Lo EC; Hu D
J Dent; 2013 Sep; 41(9):764-70. PubMed ID: 23831419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional cavity preparations for glass-ionomer restorations in primary molars: one-year results.
Yip HK; Smales RJ; Yu C; Gao XJ; Deng DM
Quintessence Int; 2002 Jan; 33(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 11887531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Short communication: Influence of different isolation methods on the survival of proximal ART restorations in primary molars after two years.
Kemoli AM; van Amerongen WE; Opinya GN
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2010 Jun; 11(3):136-9. PubMed ID: 20507811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Low-cost glass ionomer cement as ART sealant in permanent molars: a randomized clinical trial.
Hesse D; Bonifácio CC; Guglielmi Cde A; Franca Cd; Mendes FM; Raggio DP
Braz Oral Res; 2015; 29():. PubMed ID: 26039906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional restorative procedures in a hospital clinic: evaluation after 30 months.
Gao W; Peng D; Smales RJ; Yip KH
Quintessence Int; 2003 Jan; 34(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 12674356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of GIC-brand on the survival rate of proximal-ART restorations.
Bonifácio CC; Hesse D; Raggio DP; Bönecker M; van Loveren C; van Amerongen WE
Int J Paediatr Dent; 2013 Jul; 23(4):251-8. PubMed ID: 22891625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of the experience of operator and assistant on the survival rate of proximal ART restorations: two-year results.
Kemoli AM; van Amerongen WE; Opinya G
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2009 Dec; 10(4):227-32. PubMed ID: 19995507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of Atraumatic Restorative Treatment restorations and sealants under field conditions.
Motsei SM; Kroon J; Holtshousen WS
SADJ; 2001 Jul; 56(7):309-15. PubMed ID: 11575114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of the cavity-size on the survival rate of proximal ART restorations in primary molars.
Kemoli AM; van Amerongen WE
Int J Paediatr Dent; 2009 Nov; 19(6):423-30. PubMed ID: 19732191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Survival rates of two atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) types in occlusal carious permanent teeth after two years.
Ibiyemi O; Bankole OO; Oke GA
Afr J Med Med Sci; 2011 Jun; 40(2):127-34. PubMed ID: 22195380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A clinical evaluation of two glass ionomer cements in primary molars using atraumatic restorative treatment technique in India: 1 year follow up.
Deepa G; Shobha T
Int J Paediatr Dent; 2010 Nov; 20(6):410-8. PubMed ID: 20642467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Caries-preventive effect of a one-time application of composite resin and glass ionomer sealants after 5 years.
Beiruti N; Frencken JE; van't Hof MA; Taifour D; van Palenstein Helderman WH
Caries Res; 2006; 40(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 16352882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. ART restorations and glass ionomer sealants in Zimbabwe: survival after 3 years.
Frencken JE; Makoni F; Sithole WD
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1998 Dec; 26(6):372-81. PubMed ID: 9870536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Does low-cost GIC have the same survival rate as high-viscosity GIC in atraumatic restorative treatments? A RCT.
Moura MS; Sousa GP; Brito MHSF; Silva MCC; Lima MDM; Moura LFAD; Lima CCB
Braz Oral Res; 2020; 33():e125. PubMed ID: 31994598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Atraumatic restorative treatment with resin-modified glass ionomer material: short-term results of a pilot study.
Dülgergil CT; Soyman M; Civelek A
Med Princ Pract; 2005; 14(4):277-80. PubMed ID: 15961941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. 3-year survival rates of retained composite resin and ART sealants using two assessment criteria.
Hilgert LA; Leal SC; Freire GML; Mulder J; Frencken JE
Braz Oral Res; 2017 May; 31():e35. PubMed ID: 28513786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Randomized clinical trial of encapsulated and hand-mixed glass-ionomer ART restorations: one-year follow-up.
Freitas MCCA; Fagundes TC; Modena KCDS; Cardia GS; Navarro MFL
J Appl Oral Sci; 2018 Jan; 26():e20170129. PubMed ID: 29364343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. 2-year survival and cost analysis of occlusoproximal ART restorations using encapsulated glass ionomer cement in primary molars: a randomized controlled trial.
Garbim JR; Saihara CS; Olegário IC; Hesse D; Araujo MP; Bonifácio CC; Braga MM; Raggio DP
BMC Oral Health; 2024 Jun; 24(1):647. PubMed ID: 38824540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
