These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2345840)
1. Selection of patients for randomized controlled trials: implications of wide or narrow eligibility criteria. Yusuf S; Held P; Teo KK; Toretsky ER Stat Med; 1990; 9(1-2):73-83; discussion 83-6. PubMed ID: 2345840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of selection bias on the test decision. A simulation study. Tamm M; Cramer E; Kennes LN; Heussen N Methods Inf Med; 2012; 51(2):138-43. PubMed ID: 22101391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. New algorithm for treatment allocation reduced selection bias and loss of power in small trials. Hofmeijer J; Anema PC; van der Tweel I J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Feb; 61(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 18177784 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Selection criteria and generalizability within the counterfactual framework: explaining the paradox of antidepressant-induced suicidality? Weisberg HI; Hayden VC; Pontes VP Clin Trials; 2009 Apr; 6(2):109-18. PubMed ID: 19342462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Eliminating bias in randomized controlled trials: importance of allocation concealment and masking. Viera AJ; Bangdiwala SI Fam Med; 2007 Feb; 39(2):132-7. PubMed ID: 17273956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Direct effect on validity of response run-in selection in clinical trials. Berger VW; Rezvani A; Makarewicz VA Control Clin Trials; 2003 Apr; 24(2):156-66. PubMed ID: 12689737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of Selection Bias on Treatment Effect Size Estimates in Randomized Trials of Oral Health Interventions: A Meta-epidemiological Study. Saltaji H; Armijo-Olivo S; Cummings GG; Amin M; da Costa BR; Flores-Mir C J Dent Res; 2018 Jan; 97(1):5-13. PubMed ID: 28813182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The randomized clinical trial as a powerful means for understanding treatment efficacy. Phillips C; Tulloch JF Semin Orthod; 1995 Sep; 1(3):128-38. PubMed ID: 9002910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Contamination in trials: is cluster randomisation the answer? Torgerson DJ BMJ; 2001 Feb; 322(7282):355-7. PubMed ID: 11159665 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Randomised controlled trials may have many unrecognised potential biases. Hawkes N BMJ; 2018 Apr; 361():k1561. PubMed ID: 29622530 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical inference: critically weighing the evidence from trials and registries to make clinical decisions. Morrison D Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2008 Sep; 72(3):381-385. PubMed ID: 18727119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]