These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23458475)

  • 1. Real-ear output measures of ear level fluency devices.
    Stuart A; Butler AK; Jones SM; Jones TA
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Jun; 52(6):413-8. PubMed ID: 23458475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On a reference-free speech quality estimator for hearing aids.
    Suelzle D; Parsa V; Falk TH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):EL412-8. PubMed ID: 23656102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Preliminary comparison of bone-anchored hearing instruments and a dental device as treatments for unilateral hearing loss.
    Moore BC; Popelka GR
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Oct; 52(10):678-86. PubMed ID: 23859058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prescription of hearing-aid output for tinnitus relief.
    Shekhawat GS; Searchfield GD; Kobayashi K; Stinear CM
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Sep; 52(9):617-25. PubMed ID: 23859059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Amplification of transcutaneous and percutaneous bone-conduction devices with a test-band in an induced model of conductive hearing loss.
    Park MJ; Lee JR; Yang CJ; Yoo MH; Jin IS; Choi CH; Park HJ
    Int J Audiol; 2016 Nov; 55(11):653-7. PubMed ID: 27347717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of spectral change enhancement for the hearing impaired using parameter values selected with a genetic algorithm.
    Chen J; Baer T; Moore BC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):2910-20. PubMed ID: 23654396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Speech quality and stable gain trade-offs in adaptive feedback cancellation for hearing aids.
    Lee CH; Kates JM; Rao BD; Garudadri H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Oct; 142(4):EL388. PubMed ID: 29092590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Stability-controlled hybrid adaptive feedback cancellation scheme for hearing aids.
    Nordholm S; Schepker H; Tran LTT; Doclo S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Jan; 143(1):150. PubMed ID: 29390746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Difference between the default telecoil (t-coil) and programmed microphone frequency response in behind-the-ear (BTE) hearing aids.
    Putterman DB; Valente M
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 May; 23(5):366-78. PubMed ID: 22533979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Using probe-microphone measurements to improve the match to target gain and frequency response slope, as a function of earmould style, frequency, and input level.
    Munro KJ; Puri R; Bird J; Smith M
    Int J Audiol; 2016; 55(4):215-23. PubMed ID: 26541903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An examination of speech reception thresholds measured in a simulated reverberant cafeteria environment.
    Best V; Keidser G; Buchholz JM; Freeston K
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54(10):682-90. PubMed ID: 25853616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Preferred delay and phase-frequency response of open-canal hearing aids with music at low insertion gain.
    Zakis JA; Fulton B; Steele BR
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Dec; 51(12):906-13. PubMed ID: 23025794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Unexpected intensity changes in the ear canal during a F(0)-shifted feedback experiment.
    Tlumak AI; Szuminsky NJ; Shaiman S; Pratt SR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Nov; 134(5):EL413-9. PubMed ID: 24181984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Placebo effects in hearing-aid trials are reliable.
    Dawes P; Hopkins R; Munro KJ
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Jul; 52(7):472-7. PubMed ID: 23594421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Acceptable noise level (ANL) and real-world hearing-aid success in Taiwanese listeners.
    Ho HC; Wu YH; Hsiao SH; Zhang X
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Nov; 52(11):762-70. PubMed ID: 24099584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quality of life, effort and disturbance perceived in noise: a comparison between employees with aided hearing impairment and normal hearing.
    Hua H; Karlsson J; Widén S; Möller C; Lyxell B
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Sep; 52(9):642-9. PubMed ID: 23808681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Preliminary evaluation of a novel non-linear frequency compression scheme for use in children.
    Wolfe J; Duke M; Schafer EC; Rehmann J; Jha S; Allegro Baumann S; John A; Jones C
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Dec; 56(12):976-988. PubMed ID: 28851244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An individualised acoustically transparent earpiece for hearing devices.
    Denk F; Hiipakka M; Kollmeier B; Ernst SMA
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S62-S70. PubMed ID: 28635506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of the CAM2 and NAL-NL2 hearing aid fitting methods.
    Moore BC; Sęk A
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):83-95. PubMed ID: 22878351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Spatial hearing in a child with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder and bilateral cochlear implants.
    Johnstone PM; Yeager KR; Noss E
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Jun; 52(6):400-8. PubMed ID: 23586418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.