127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23458985)
1. Prognostic significance of Ki-67 expression in rectal carcinoid tumors.
Hong SM; Kim YS; Moon JS; Kim JN; Oh MK; Kwon SO; Jeong SY; Hong SW; Kang YK
Korean J Gastroenterol; 2013 Feb; 61(2):82-7. PubMed ID: 23458985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Endoscopic submucosal dissection or conventional endoscopic mucosal resection is an effective and safe treatment for rectal carcinoid tumors: a retrospective study.
Baek IH
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2010 May; 20(4):329-31. PubMed ID: 20438309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The clinical outcomes and risk factors associated with incomplete endoscopic resection of rectal carcinoid tumor.
Choi CW; Park SB; Kang DH; Kim HW; Kim SJ; Nam HS; Ryu DG
Surg Endosc; 2017 Dec; 31(12):5006-5011. PubMed ID: 28936630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Endoloop ligation after endoscopic mucosal resection using a transparent cap: A novel method to treat small rectal carcinoid tumors.
Zhang DG; Luo S; Xiong F; Xu ZL; Li YX; Yao J; Wang LS
World J Gastroenterol; 2019 Mar; 25(10):1259-1265. PubMed ID: 30886508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effectiveness of endoscopic submucosal resection with a ligation device for small rectal carcinoid tumors: focused on previously biopsied tumors.
Im YC; Jung SW; Cha HJ; Yang SS; Kim GY; Yi YA; Park JH; Kim BG; Jeong ID
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2014 Jun; 24(3):264-9. PubMed ID: 24710234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Treatment outcomes of endoscopic resection for rectal carcinoid tumors: an analysis of the resectability and long-term results from 46 consecutive cases.
Kaneko H; Hirasawa K; Koh R; Kobayashi R; Kokawa A; Tanaka K; Maeda S
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2016 Dec; 51(12):1489-1494. PubMed ID: 27687741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Efficacy of endoscopic resection for small rectal carcinoid: a retrospective study].
Kim YJ; Lee SK; Cheon JH; Kim TI; Lee YC; Kim WH; Chung JB; Yi SW; Park S
Korean J Gastroenterol; 2008 Mar; 51(3):174-80. PubMed ID: 18451691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Usefulness of Ki-67 for predicting the metastatic potential of rectal carcinoids.
Hotta K; Shimoda T; Nakanishi Y; Saito D
Pathol Int; 2006 Oct; 56(10):591-6. PubMed ID: 16984615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Criteria for decision making after endoscopic resection of well-differentiated rectal carcinoids with regard to potential lymphatic spread.
Park CH; Cheon JH; Kim JO; Shin JE; Jang BI; Shin SJ; Jeen YT; Lee SH; Ji JS; Han DS; Jung SA; Park DI; Baek IH; Kim SH; Chang DK
Endoscopy; 2011 Sep; 43(9):790-5. PubMed ID: 21735371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for rectal neuroendocrine (carcinoid) tumors.
Moon SH; Hwang JH; Sohn DK; Park JW; Hong CW; Han KS; Chang HJ; Oh JH
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2011 Oct; 21(8):695-9. PubMed ID: 21657940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Rectal carcinoid tumors: review of results after endoscopic and surgical therapy.
Kwaan MR; Goldberg JE; Bleday R
Arch Surg; 2008 May; 143(5):471-5. PubMed ID: 18490556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Ki-67 labeling index and lymphatic/venous permeation predict the metastatic potential of rectal neuroendocrine tumors.
Sugimoto S; Hotta K; Shimoda T; Imai K; Yamaguchi Y; Nakajima T; Oishi T; Mori K; Takizawa K; Kakushima N; Tanaka M; Kawata N; Matsubayashi H; Ono H
Surg Endosc; 2016 Oct; 30(10):4239-48. PubMed ID: 26718357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of endoscopic treatments in rectal carcinoid tumors.
Lee HJ; Kim SB; Shin CM; Seo AY; Lee DH; Kim N; Park YS; Yoon H
Surg Endosc; 2016 Aug; 30(8):3491-8. PubMed ID: 26514133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effectiveness of local endoscopic resection of rectal carcinoid tumors.
Higaki S; Nishiaki M; Mitani N; Yanai H; Tada M; Okita K
Endoscopy; 1997 Mar; 29(3):171-5. PubMed ID: 9201465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Role of Histologic Grading and Ki-67 Index in Predicting Outcomes in Pulmonary Carcinoid Tumors.
Dermawan JKT; Farver CF
Am J Surg Pathol; 2020 Feb; 44(2):224-231. PubMed ID: 31490236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The feasibility of endoscopic submucosal dissection for rectal carcinoid tumors: comparison with endoscopic mucosal resection.
Lee DS; Jeon SW; Park SY; Jung MK; Cho CM; Tak WY; Kweon YO; Kim SK
Endoscopy; 2010 Aug; 42(8):647-51. PubMed ID: 20669076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Endoscopic treatment of rectal carcinoid tumors.
Onozato Y; Kakizaki S; Iizuka H; Sohara N; Mori M; Itoh H
Dis Colon Rectum; 2010 Feb; 53(2):169-76. PubMed ID: 20087092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnosis and treatment experience of rectal carcinoid (a report of 312 cases).
Yangong H; Shi C; Shahbaz M; Zhengchuan N; Wang J; Liang B; Ruliang F; Gao H; Bo Q; Niu J
Int J Surg; 2014; 12(5):408-11. PubMed ID: 24631555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Efficacy of endoscopic submucosal resection with a ligation device for removing small rectal carcinoid tumor compared with endoscopic mucosal resection: analysis of 100 cases.
Kim HH; Park SJ; Lee SH; Park HU; Song CS; Park MI; Moon W
Dig Endosc; 2012 May; 24(3):159-63. PubMed ID: 22507089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Endoscopic submucosal dissection versus transanal local excision for rectal carcinoid: a comparative study.
Yan FH; Lou Z; Hu SJ; Xu XD; Wang H; Wang HT; Meng RG; Fu CG; Zhang W; He J; Yu ED
World J Surg Oncol; 2016 Jun; 14(1):162. PubMed ID: 27324379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
