These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23460026)

  • 1. Exploring the overestimation of conjunctive probabilities.
    Nilsson H; Rieskamp J; Jenny MA
    Front Psychol; 2013; 4():101. PubMed ID: 23460026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Inferring conjunctive probabilities from noisy samples: evidence for the configural weighted average model.
    Jenny MA; Rieskamp J; Nilsson H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jan; 40(1):203-17. PubMed ID: 24128388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An account of subjective probability judgment for joint events: Conjunctive and disjunctive.
    Fisk JE; Marshall DA; Rogers P; Stock R
    Scand J Psychol; 2019 Oct; 60(5):405-420. PubMed ID: 31242534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Surprising rationality in probability judgment: Assessing two competing models.
    Costello F; Watts P; Fisher C
    Cognition; 2018 Jan; 170():280-297. PubMed ID: 29096329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reasoning about conjunctive probabilistic concepts in childhood.
    Fisk JE; Slattery R
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2005 Sep; 59(3):168-78. PubMed ID: 16248496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analysis of Physicians' Probability Estimates of a Medical Outcome Based on a Sequence of Events.
    Arkes HR; Aberegg SK; Arpin KA
    JAMA Netw Open; 2022 Jun; 5(6):e2218804. PubMed ID: 35759260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing the chances of success: naïve statistics versus kind experience.
    Hogarth RM; Mukherjee K; Soyer E
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jan; 39(1):14-32. PubMed ID: 22686845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Thinking Concretely Increases the Perceived Likelihood of Risks: The Effect of Construal Level on Risk Estimation.
    Lermer E; Streicher B; Sachs R; Raue M; Frey D
    Risk Anal; 2016 Mar; 36(3):623-37. PubMed ID: 26111548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. People's conditional probability judgments follow probability theory (plus noise).
    Costello F; Watts P
    Cogn Psychol; 2016 Sep; 89():106-33. PubMed ID: 27570097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How environmental regularities affect people's information search in probability judgments from experience.
    Hoffart JC; Rieskamp J; Dutilh G
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Feb; 45(2):219-231. PubMed ID: 30024248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Representativeness and conjoint probability.
    Gavanski I; Roskos-Ewoldsen DR
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1991 Aug; 61(2):181-94. PubMed ID: 1920061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Linda is not a bearded lady: configural weighting and adding as the cause of extension errors.
    Nilsson H; Winman A; Juslin P; Hansson G
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 Nov; 138(4):517-34. PubMed ID: 19883134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The quantitative estimation of IT-related risk probabilities.
    Herrmann A
    Risk Anal; 2013 Aug; 33(8):1510-31. PubMed ID: 23278707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Source reliability and the conjunction fallacy.
    Jarvstad A; Hahn U
    Cogn Sci; 2011; 35(4):682-711. PubMed ID: 21564268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Naive Probability: Model-Based Estimates of Unique Events.
    Khemlani SS; Lotstein M; Johnson-Laird PN
    Cogn Sci; 2015 Aug; 39(6):1216-58. PubMed ID: 25363706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On the determinants of the conjunction fallacy: probability versus inductive confirmation.
    Tentori K; Crupi V; Russo S
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2013 Feb; 142(1):235-255. PubMed ID: 22823498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Random variation and systematic biases in probability estimation.
    Howe R; Costello F
    Cogn Psychol; 2020 Dec; 123():101306. PubMed ID: 33189032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Parallel Interactive Processing as a Way to Understand Complex Information Processing: The Conjunction Fallacy and Other Examples.
    Nahinsky ID
    Am J Psychol; 2017 Summer; 130(2):201-222. PubMed ID: 29461716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Probability Theory Plus Noise: Descriptive Estimation and Inferential Judgment.
    Costello F; Watts P
    Top Cogn Sci; 2018 Jan; 10(1):192-208. PubMed ID: 29383882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Heuristics can produce surprisingly rational probability estimates: Comment on Costello and Watts (2014).
    Nilsson H; Juslin P; Winman A
    Psychol Rev; 2016 Jan; 123(1):103-11. PubMed ID: 26709414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.