These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

323 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23460864)

  • 1. Repeat prostate biopsy strategies after initial negative biopsy: meta-regression comparing cancer detection of transperineal, transrectal saturation and MRI guided biopsy.
    Nelson AW; Harvey RC; Parker RA; Kastner C; Doble A; Gnanapragasam VJ
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(2):e57480. PubMed ID: 23460864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The eternal enigma in prostatic biopsy access route.
    Fabiani A; Principi E; Filosa A; Servi L
    Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2017 Oct; 89(3):245-246. PubMed ID: 28969413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How many cores are enough? Optimizing the transperineal prostate biopsy template.
    Schaufler C; Daigle R; Singhaviranon S; Gjertson CK; Albertsen PC; Ristau BT
    Urol Oncol; 2022 May; 40(5):191.e1-191.e7. PubMed ID: 35067430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Critical evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging targeted, transrectal ultrasound guided transperineal fusion biopsy for detection of prostate cancer.
    Kuru TH; Roethke MC; Seidenader J; Simpfendörfer T; Boxler S; Alammar K; Rieker P; Popeneciu VI; Roth W; Pahernik S; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
    J Urol; 2013 Oct; 190(4):1380-6. PubMed ID: 23608676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Efficacy of Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Biopsy Versus Transperineal Template Biopsy of the Prostate in Diagnosing Prostate Cancer in Men with Previous Negative Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Biopsy.
    Nafie S; Wanis M; Khan M
    Urol J; 2017 Mar; 14(2):3008-3012. PubMed ID: 28299763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Transperineal Versus Transrectal Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsies for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: Final Results of the Randomized PERFECT trial (CCAFU-PR1).
    Ploussard G; Barret E; Fiard G; Lenfant L; Malavaud B; Giannarini G; Almeras C; Aziza R; Renard-Penna R; Descotes JL; Rozet F; Beauval JB; Salin A; Rouprêt M
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2024 Oct; 7(5):1080-1087. PubMed ID: 38403523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multiparametric MRI to improve detection of prostate cancer compared with transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy alone: the PROMIS study.
    Brown LC; Ahmed HU; Faria R; El-Shater Bosaily A; Gabe R; Kaplan RS; Parmar M; Collaco-Moraes Y; Ward K; Hindley RG; Freeman A; Kirkham A; Oldroyd R; Parker C; Bott S; Burns-Cox N; Dudderidge T; Ghei M; Henderson A; Persad R; Rosario DJ; Shergill I; Winkler M; Soares M; Spackman E; Sculpher M; Emberton M
    Health Technol Assess; 2018 Jul; 22(39):1-176. PubMed ID: 30040065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A noninferiority within-person study comparing the accuracy of transperineal to transrectal MRI-US fusion biopsy for prostate-cancer detection.
    Ber Y; Segal N; Tamir S; Benjaminov O; Yakimov M; Sela S; Halstauch D; Baniel J; Kedar D; Margel D
    Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2020 Sep; 23(3):449-456. PubMed ID: 31953483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A retrospective comparison between transrectal and transperineal prostate biopsy in the detection of prostate cancer.
    Di Franco CA; Jallous H; Porru D; Giliberto GL; Cebrelli T; Tinelli C; Rovereto B
    Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2017 Mar; 89(1):55-59. PubMed ID: 28403597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Transperineal magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy versus transrectal route in the detection of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Wu Q; Tu X; Zhang C; Ye J; Lin T; Liu Z; Yang L; Qiu S; Bao Y; Wei Q
    Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2024 Jun; 27(2):212-221. PubMed ID: 37783837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A systematic review and meta-analysis of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound guided fusion biopsy of prostate for cancer detection-Comparing transrectal with transperineal approaches.
    Loy LM; Lim GH; Leow JJ; Lee CH; Tan TW; Tan CH
    Urol Oncol; 2020 Aug; 38(8):650-660. PubMed ID: 32505458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The diagnostic accuracy and cost-effectiveness of magnetic resonance spectroscopy and enhanced magnetic resonance imaging techniques in aiding the localisation of prostate abnormalities for biopsy: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
    Mowatt G; Scotland G; Boachie C; Cruickshank M; Ford JA; Fraser C; Kurban L; Lam TB; Padhani AR; Royle J; Scheenen TW; Tassie E
    Health Technol Assess; 2013 May; 17(20):vii-xix, 1-281. PubMed ID: 23697373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy may enhance the diagnostic accuracy of significant prostate cancer detection compared to standard transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Schoots IG; Roobol MJ; Nieboer D; Bangma CH; Steyerberg EW; Hunink MG
    Eur Urol; 2015 Sep; 68(3):438-50. PubMed ID: 25480312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative analysis of transperineal template saturation prostate biopsy versus magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy with magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion guidance.
    Radtke JP; Kuru TH; Boxler S; Alt CD; Popeneciu IV; Huettenbrink C; Klein T; Steinemann S; Bergstraesser C; Roethke M; Roth W; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
    J Urol; 2015 Jan; 193(1):87-94. PubMed ID: 25079939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection Following Transrectal and Transperineal Biopsy: Results of the Prostate Biopsy Efficacy and Complications Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Mian BM; Feustel PJ; Aziz A; Kaufman RP; Bernstein A; Fisher HAG
    J Urol; 2024 Jul; 212(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 38700844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evolution of repeat prostate biopsy strategies incorporating transperineal and MRI-TRUS fusion techniques.
    Kuru TH; Saeb-Parsy K; Cantiani A; Frey J; Lombardo R; Serrao E; Gaziev G; Koo B; Roethke M; Gnanapragasam V; Warren A; Doble A; Hadaschik B; Kastner C
    World J Urol; 2014 Aug; 32(4):945-50. PubMed ID: 24917295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The results of transperineal versus transrectal prostate biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Shen PF; Zhu YC; Wei WR; Li YZ; Yang J; Li YT; Li DM; Wang J; Zeng H
    Asian J Androl; 2012 Mar; 14(2):310-5. PubMed ID: 22101942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of transperineal and transrectal targeted prostate biopsy using Mahalanobis distance matching within propensity score caliper method: A multicenter study of Turkish Urooncology Association.
    Koparal MY; Sözen TS; Karşıyakalı N; Aslan G; Akdoğan B; Şahin B; Türkeri L;
    Prostate; 2022 Mar; 82(4):425-432. PubMed ID: 34927740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Systematic and MRI-Cognitive Targeted Transperineal Prostate Biopsy Accuracy in Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer after Previous Negative Biopsy and Persisting Suspicion of Malignancy.
    Vėželis A; Platkevičius G; Kinčius M; Gumbys L; Naruševičiūtė I; Briedienė R; Petroška D; Ulys A; Jankevičius F
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2021 Jan; 57(1):. PubMed ID: 33435132
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. MRI-guided biopsy of the prostate: correlation between the cancer detection rate and the number of previous negative TRUS biopsies.
    Durmuş T; Reichelt U; Huppertz A; Hamm B; Beyersdorff D; Franiel T
    Diagn Interv Radiol; 2013; 19(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 23886937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.