These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23460924)
1. The effects of computed tomography with iterative reconstruction on solid pulmonary nodule volume quantification. Willemink MJ; Borstlap J; Takx RA; Schilham AM; Leiner T; Budde RP; de Jong PA PLoS One; 2013; 8(2):e58053. PubMed ID: 23460924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Systematic error in lung nodule volumetry: effect of iterative reconstruction versus filtered back projection at different CT parameters. Willemink MJ; Leiner T; Budde RP; de Kort FP; Vliegenthart R; van Ooijen PM; Oudkerk M; de Jong PA AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Dec; 199(6):1241-6. PubMed ID: 23169714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Volumetric measurement of artificial pure ground-glass nodules at low-dose CT: Comparisons between hybrid iterative reconstruction and filtered back projection. Sakai N; Yabuuchi H; Kondo M; Kojima T; Nagatomo K; Kawanami S; Kamitani T; Yonezawa M; Nagao M; Honda H Eur J Radiol; 2015 Dec; 84(12):2654-62. PubMed ID: 26362824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. CT volumetry of artificial pulmonary nodules using an ex vivo lung phantom: influence of exposure parameters and iterative reconstruction on reproducibility. Wielpütz MO; Lederlin M; Wroblewski J; Dinkel J; Eichinger M; Biederer J; Kauczor HU; Puderbach M Eur J Radiol; 2013 Sep; 82(9):1577-83. PubMed ID: 23727376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of the effects of model-based iterative reconstruction and filtered back projection algorithms on software measurements in pulmonary subsolid nodules. Cohen JG; Kim H; Park SB; van Ginneken B; Ferretti GR; Lee CH; Goo JM; Park CM Eur Radiol; 2017 Aug; 27(8):3266-3274. PubMed ID: 28058482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Observer Performance for Detection of Pulmonary Nodules at Chest CT over a Large Range of Radiation Dose Levels. Fletcher JG; Levin DL; Sykes AG; Lindell RM; White DB; Kuzo RS; Suresh V; Yu L; Leng S; Holmes DR; Inoue A; Johnson MP; Carter RE; McCollough CH Radiology; 2020 Dec; 297(3):699-707. PubMed ID: 32990514 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of radiation dose and iterative reconstruction algorithms for measurement accuracy and reproducibility of pulmonary nodule volumetry: A phantom study. Kim H; Park CM; Song YS; Lee SM; Goo JM Eur J Radiol; 2014 May; 83(5):848-57. PubMed ID: 24572380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy of lung nodule volumetry in low-dose CT with iterative reconstruction: an anthropomorphic thoracic phantom study. Doo KW; Kang EY; Yong HS; Woo OH; Lee KY; Oh YW Br J Radiol; 2014 Sep; 87(1041):20130644. PubMed ID: 25026866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Volumetric quantification of lung nodules in CT with iterative reconstruction (ASiR and MBIR). Chen B; Barnhart H; Richard S; Robins M; Colsher J; Samei E Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111902. PubMed ID: 24320435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pulmonary nodule volumetric measurement variability as a function of CT slice thickness and nodule morphology. Petrou M; Quint LE; Nan B; Baker LH AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Feb; 188(2):306-12. PubMed ID: 17242235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of flat-panel-detector-based CT and multidetector-row CT in automated volumetry of pulmonary nodules using an anthropomorphic chest phantom. Marten K; Dullin C; Machann W; Schmid JS; DAS M; Hermann KP; Engelke C Br J Radiol; 2009 Aug; 82(981):716-23. PubMed ID: 19332516 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [The intra-observer variability of volumetric measurement of pulmonary nodules: comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional method]. Guo X; Wang Y; Li D; Zhang C; Cao Y; Su D; Yu T Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi; 2014 Apr; 17(4):336-41. PubMed ID: 24758909 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of radiation dose reduction and iterative reconstruction on computer-aided detection of pulmonary nodules: Intra-individual comparison. Den Harder AM; Willemink MJ; van Hamersvelt RW; Vonken EJ; Milles J; Schilham AM; Lammers JW; de Jong PA; Leiner T; Budde RP Eur J Radiol; 2016 Feb; 85(2):346-51. PubMed ID: 26781139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Detection and size measurements of pulmonary nodules in ultra-low-dose CT with iterative reconstruction compared to low dose CT. Sui X; Meinel FG; Song W; Xu X; Wang Z; Wang Y; Jin Z; Chen J; Vliegenthart R; Schoepf UJ Eur J Radiol; 2016 Mar; 85(3):564-70. PubMed ID: 26860668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Variability of semiautomated lung nodule volumetry on ultralow-dose CT: comparison with nodule volumetry on standard-dose CT. Hein PA; Romano VC; Rogalla P; Klessen C; Lembcke A; Bornemann L; Dicken V; Hamm B; Bauknecht HC J Digit Imaging; 2010 Feb; 23(1):8-17. PubMed ID: 18773240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Linear and volume measurements of pulmonary nodules at different CT dose levels - intrascan and interscan analysis. Hein PA; Romano VC; Rogalla P; Klessen C; Lembcke A; Dicken V; Bornemann L; Bauknecht HC Rofo; 2009 Jan; 181(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 19085687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Doubling time calculations for lung cancer by three-dimensional computer-aided volumetry: effects of inter-observer differences and nodule characteristics. Koike W; Iwano S; Matsuo K; Kitano M; Kawakami K; Naganawa S J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2014 Feb; 58(1):82-8. PubMed ID: 24304703 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ultralow-dose chest computed tomography for pulmonary nodule detection: first performance evaluation of single energy scanning with spectral shaping. Gordic S; Morsbach F; Schmidt B; Allmendinger T; Flohr T; Husarik D; Baumueller S; Raupach R; Stolzmann P; Leschka S; Frauenfelder T; Alkadhi H Invest Radiol; 2014 Jul; 49(7):465-73. PubMed ID: 24598443 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Techniques for virtual lung nodule insertion: volumetric and morphometric comparison of projection-based and image-based methods for quantitative CT. Robins M; Solomon J; Sahbaee P; Sedlmair M; Roy Choudhury K; Pezeshk A; Sahiner B; Samei E Phys Med Biol; 2017 Aug; 62(18):7280-7299. PubMed ID: 28786399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]