These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23461001)

  • 1. DNA profiles, computer searches, and the Fourth Amendment.
    Kimel CW
    Duke Law J; 2013; 62(4):933-73. PubMed ID: 23461001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing Fourth Amendment challenges to DNA extraction statutes after Samson v. California.
    Nerko CJ
    Fordham Law Rev; 2008 Nov; 77(2):917-49. PubMed ID: 19353834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mandatory genetic dogtags and the Fourth Amendment: the need for a new post-Skinner test.
    Scherer RC
    Georgetown Law J; 1997 Jun; 85(6):2007-38. PubMed ID: 16523576
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Beware! Uncle Sam has your DNA: legal fallout from its use and misuse in the U.S.
    Weiss MJ
    Ethics Inf Technol; 2004; 6(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 16969961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Canada's DNA databank: public safety and private costs.
    Parfett J
    Manit Law J; 2002; 29(1):33-79. PubMed ID: 16514758
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Criminal DNA databank statutes and medical research.
    Bressler DD
    Jurimetrics; 2002; 43(1):51-67. PubMed ID: 15233123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. I-DNA-fication, personal privacy, and social justice.
    Juengst ET
    Chic Kent Law Rev; 1999; 75():61-82. PubMed ID: 15732203
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Allowing new technology to erode constitutional protections: a Fourth Amendment challenge to non-consensual DNA testing of prisoners.
    Love SH
    Villanova Law Rev; 1993; 38(5):1617-60. PubMed ID: 11653232
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Forensic DNA data banks: considerations for the health sector.
    Lakra R; Dimitriadis F
    Health Law Can; 2002 Feb; 22(3):57-70. PubMed ID: 11915589
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reclaiming "abandoned" DNA: the Fourth Amendment and genetic privacy.
    Joh EE
    Northwest Univ Law Rev; 2006; 100(2):857-84. PubMed ID: 17340772
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. DNA analysis and the Freedom of Information Act: information or invasion?
    Might C
    Oklahoma City Univ Law Rev; 2001; 26(2):773-95. PubMed ID: 12741386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. DNA databanks: law enforcement's greatest surveillance tool?
    Hibbert M
    Wake Forest Law Rev; 1999; 34(3):767-825. PubMed ID: 12664925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. DNA fingerprinting and civil liberties.
    Noble AA
    J Law Med Ethics; 2006; 34(2):149-52. PubMed ID: 16789939
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Genetic privacy: constitutional considerations in forensic DNA testing.
    Burk DL; Hess JA
    Geoge Mason Univ Civ Rights Law J; 1994; 5(1):1-53. PubMed ID: 11657430
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. DNA databanks: when has a good thing gone too far?
    Herlica DA
    Syracuse Law Rev; 2002; 52(3):951-77. PubMed ID: 15212076
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comment: DNA as property: implications on the constitutionality of DNA dragnets.
    Will JF
    Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 2003; 65(1):129-43. PubMed ID: 15568272
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Forensics. The FBI's national DNA database.
    Hoyle R
    Nat Biotechnol; 1998 Nov; 16(11):987. PubMed ID: 9831012
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The retention of forensic DNA samples: a socio-ethical evaluation of current practices in the EU.
    Van Camp N; Dierickx K
    J Med Ethics; 2008 Aug; 34(8):606-10. PubMed ID: 18667650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Who needs special needs? On the constitutionality of collecting DNA and other biometric data from arrestees.
    Kaye DH
    J Law Med Ethics; 2006; 34(2):188-98. PubMed ID: 16789942
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Can the government get into your genes?: A proposed New York statute for the use of genetic identification to establish probable cause.
    Cavoli JG
    Albany Law Rev; 1992; 55(4):1355-414. PubMed ID: 11652956
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.