These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23461583)

  • 1. A comparative reliability and performance study of different stent designs in terms of mechanical properties: foreshortening, recoil, radial force, and flexibility.
    Kim DB; Choi H; Joo SM; Kim HK; Shin JH; Hwang MH; Choi J; Kim DG; Lee KH; Lim CH; Yoo SK; Lee HM; Sun K
    Artif Organs; 2013 Apr; 37(4):368-79. PubMed ID: 23461583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multiobjective design optimisation of coronary stents.
    Pant S; Limbert G; Curzen NP; Bressloff NW
    Biomaterials; 2011 Nov; 32(31):7755-73. PubMed ID: 21821283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Finite element simulation and testing of cobalt-chromium stent: a parametric study on radial strength, recoil, foreshortening, and dogboning.
    Kumar A; Bhatnagar N
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2021 Feb; 24(3):245-259. PubMed ID: 33021106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A novel double arrowhead auxetic coronary stent.
    Gupta K; Meena K
    Comput Biol Med; 2023 Nov; 166():107525. PubMed ID: 37778216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Future Balloon-Expandable Stents: High or Low-Strength Materials?
    Khalilimeybodi A; Alishzadeh Khoei A; Sharif-Kashani B
    Cardiovasc Eng Technol; 2020 Apr; 11(2):188-204. PubMed ID: 31836964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Design optimization of stent and its dilatation balloon using kriging surrogate model.
    Li H; Liu T; Wang M; Zhao D; Qiao A; Wang X; Gu J; Li Z; Zhu B
    Biomed Eng Online; 2017 Jan; 16(1):13. PubMed ID: 28086895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Modeling of stents exhibiting negative Poisson's ratio effect.
    Raamachandran J; Jayavenkateshwaran K
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2007 Aug; 10(4):245-55. PubMed ID: 17671858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of design parameters on the radial force of percutaneous aortic valve stents.
    Kumar GV; Mathew L
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2010; 11(2):101-4. PubMed ID: 20347800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Finite element analysis and stent design: Reduction of dogboning.
    De Beule M; Van Impe R; Verhegghe B; Segers P; Verdonck P
    Technol Health Care; 2006; 14(4-5):233-41. PubMed ID: 17065746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparing coronary stent material performance on a common geometric platform through simulated bench testing.
    Grogan JA; Leen SB; McHugh PE
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2012 Aug; 12():129-38. PubMed ID: 22705476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Geometry parameterization and multidisciplinary constrained optimization of coronary stents.
    Pant S; Bressloff NW; Limbert G
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2012 Jan; 11(1-2):61-82. PubMed ID: 21373889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multi-objective optimization of coronary stent using Kriging surrogate model.
    Li H; Gu J; Wang M; Zhao D; Li Z; Qiao A; Zhu B
    Biomed Eng Online; 2016 Dec; 15(Suppl 2):148. PubMed ID: 28155700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mechanical behavior of coronary stents investigated through the finite element method.
    Migliavacca F; Petrini L; Colombo M; Auricchio F; Pietrabissa R
    J Biomech; 2002 Jun; 35(6):803-11. PubMed ID: 12021000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Radial force of coronary stents: a comparative analysis.
    Rieu R; Barragan P; Masson C; Fuseri J; Garitey V; Silvestri M; Roquebert P; Sainsous J
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 1999 Mar; 46(3):380-91. PubMed ID: 10348145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Suggestion of potential stent design parameters to reduce restenosis risk driven by foreshortening or dogboning due to non-uniform balloon-stent expansion.
    Lim D; Cho SK; Park WP; Kristensson A; Ko JY; Al-Hassani ST; Kim HS
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2008 Jul; 36(7):1118-29. PubMed ID: 18437572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Finite element analysis for compression and expansion behavior of magnesium stent].
    Chen H; Liu X; Yuan G; Zhang L; Li Z; Luo Q; Lin F
    Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 2014 May; 38(3):161-4, 176. PubMed ID: 25241506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Finite element comparison of performance related characteristics of balloon expandable stents.
    Donnelly EW; Bruzzi MS; Connolley T; McHugh PE
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2007 Apr; 10(2):103-10. PubMed ID: 18651276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Finite element analysis of the expansion behavior of coronary stents].
    Wang W; Yang D; Qi M
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2006 Dec; 23(6):1258-62, 1266. PubMed ID: 17228721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mechanical properties of coronary stents determined by using finite element analysis.
    Etave F; Finet G; Boivin M; Boyer JC; Rioufol G; Thollet G
    J Biomech; 2001 Aug; 34(8):1065-75. PubMed ID: 11448698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mechanical behavior of fully expanded commercially available endovascular coronary stents.
    Tambaca J; Canic S; Kosor M; Fish RD; Paniagua D
    Tex Heart Inst J; 2011; 38(5):491-501. PubMed ID: 22163122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.