358 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23462065)
1. Caval penetration by retrievable inferior vena cava filters: a retrospective comparison of Option and Günther Tulip filters.
Olorunsola OG; Kohi MP; Fidelman N; Westphalen AC; Kolli PK; Taylor AG; Gordon RL; LaBerge JM; Kerlan RK
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):566-71. PubMed ID: 23462065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Perforation of the IVC: rule rather than exception after longer indwelling times for the Günther Tulip and Celect retrievable filters.
Durack JC; Westphalen AC; Kekulawela S; Bhanu SB; Avrin DE; Gordon RL; Kerlan RK
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2012 Apr; 35(2):299-308. PubMed ID: 21448771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Removal of retrievable inferior vena cava filters with computed tomography findings indicating tenting or penetration of the inferior vena cava wall.
Oh JC; Trerotola SO; Dagli M; Shlansky-Goldberg RD; Soulen MC; Itkin M; Mondschein J; Solomon J; Stavropoulos SW
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2011 Jan; 22(1):70-4. PubMed ID: 21106393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Complications of Celect, Günther tulip, and Greenfield inferior vena cava filters on CT follow-up: a single-institution experience.
McLoney ED; Krishnasamy VP; Castle JC; Yang X; Guy G
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2013 Nov; 24(11):1723-9. PubMed ID: 24041915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Laparoscopic demonstration of vena cava wall penetration by inferior vena cava filters in an ovine model.
Laborda A; Lostalé F; Rodríguez JB; Bielsa MÁ; Martínez MÁ; Serrano C; Fernández R; De Gregorio MÁ
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2011 Jun; 22(6):851-6. PubMed ID: 21481604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical comparison of two optional vena cava filters.
Keller IS; Meier C; Pfiffner R; Keller E; Pfammatter T
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2007 Apr; 18(4):505-11. PubMed ID: 17446541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Long-term computed tomography follow-up results of strut penetration of inferior vena cava filters.
Yang SS; Yun WS
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord; 2019 Sep; 7(5):646-652. PubMed ID: 31231055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Surgical removal of a Günther Tulip filter with symptomatic caval penetration after unsuccessful percutaneous retrieval.
Hwang JK; Kim JI; Kim SD; Cho KJ; Moon IS
Ann Vasc Surg; 2011 Jul; 25(5):699.e9-12. PubMed ID: 21514104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Re: Penetration of Günther tulip filter struts through an introducer sheath-case report and safety concerns.
Carrillo TC; Bui JT; Knuttinen MG; Gaba RC; Owens CA
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2010 Feb; 21(2):305-6. PubMed ID: 20036148
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Günther Tulip and Celect IVC filters in multiple-trauma patients.
Rosenthal D; Kochupura PV; Wellons ED; Burkett AB; Methodius-Rayford WC
J Endovasc Ther; 2009 Aug; 16(4):494-9. PubMed ID: 19702346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Gunther Tulip retrievable inferior vena caval filters: indications, efficacy, retrieval, and complications.
Looby S; Given MF; Geoghegan T; McErlean A; Lee MJ
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2007; 30(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 17122885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Gunther Tulip Filter Strut Penetration: Benign Long-Term Follow-up.
Hoffer EK; Mueller RJ; Lee NN; Munger DP; Gemery JM
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2023 Feb; 34(2):261-267.e2. PubMed ID: 37190972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Retrieval of Gunther Tulip optional vena cava filters 30 days after implantation: a prospective clinical study.
De Gregorio MA; Gamboa P; Bonilla DL; Sanchez M; Higuera MT; Medrano J; Mainar A; Lostalé F; Laborda A
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2006 Nov; 17(11 Pt 1):1781-9. PubMed ID: 17142708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Retrievability of the Günther Tulip vena cava filter after dwell times longer than 180 days in patients with multiple trauma.
Rosenthal D; Wellons ED; Hancock SM; Burkett AB
J Endovasc Ther; 2007 Jun; 14(3):406-10. PubMed ID: 17723017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Suprarenal inferior vena cava filters: a 20-year single-center experience.
Kalva SP; Chlapoutaki C; Wicky S; Greenfield AJ; Waltman AC; Athanasoulis CA
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2008 Jul; 19(7):1041-7. PubMed ID: 18589318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Retrospective Review of 516 Implantations of Option Inferior Vena Cava Filters at a Single Health Care System.
Tsui B; An T; Moon E; King R; Wang W
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2016 Mar; 27(3):345-53. PubMed ID: 26826941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Symptomatic perforation of a retrievable inferior vena cava filter after a dwell time of 5 years.
Parkin E; Serracino-Inglott F; Chalmers N; Smyth V
J Vasc Surg; 2009 Aug; 50(2):417-9. PubMed ID: 19631878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Greenfield stainless steel vena cava filters on computed tomography follow-up.
Chen J; Castle JC; Makary MS; Yang X; Dowell JD
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord; 2020 Sep; 8(5):762-768. PubMed ID: 32063523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Significant caval penetration by the celect inferior vena cava filter: attributable to filter design?
Sadaf A; Rasuli P; Olivier A; Hadziomerovic A; French GJ; Aquino J; O'Kelly K; Al-Mutairi B
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2007 Nov; 18(11):1447-50. PubMed ID: 18003998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Penetration of Celect inferior vena cava filters: retrospective review of CT scans in 265 patients.
Zhou D; Moon E; Bullen J; Sands M; Levitin A; Wang W
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Mar; 202(3):643-7. PubMed ID: 24555603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
