175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23463019)
1. Comparison of the responsiveness of the SF-36, the Oxford Knee Score, and the Knee Society Clinical Rating System in patients undergoing total knee replacement.
Ko Y; Lo NN; Yeo SJ; Yang KY; Yeo W; Chong HC; Thumboo J
Qual Life Res; 2013 Nov; 22(9):2455-9. PubMed ID: 23463019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Rasch analysis of the Oxford Knee Score.
Ko Y; Lo NN; Yeo SJ; Yang KY; Yeo W; Chong HC; Thumboo J
Osteoarthritis Cartilage; 2009 Sep; 17(9):1163-9. PubMed ID: 19409293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Crosscultural Adaptation and Validation of the Korean Version of the New Knee Society Knee Scoring System.
Kim SJ; Basur MS; Park CK; Chong S; Kang YG; Kim MJ; Jeong JS; Kim TK
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Jun; 475(6):1629-1639. PubMed ID: 28265885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Responsiveness, Reliability, and Validity of Arabic Version of Oxford Knee Score for Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Bin Sheeha B; Williams A; Johnson DS; Granat M; Bin Nasser A; Jones R
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2020 Aug; 102(15):e89. PubMed ID: 32769604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diabetes does not influence the early outcome of total knee replacement: a prospective study assessing the Oxford knee score, short form 12, and patient satisfaction.
Clement ND; MacDonald D; Burnett R; Breusch SJ
Knee; 2013 Dec; 20(6):437-41. PubMed ID: 23993274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validity and responsiveness of the Knee Society Clinical Rating System in comparison with the SF-36 and WOMAC.
Lingard EA; Katz JN; Wright RJ; Wright EA; Sledge CB;
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2001 Dec; 83(12):1856-64. PubMed ID: 11741066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Socioeconomic status affects the Oxford knee score and short-form 12 score following total knee replacement.
Clement ND; Jenkins PJ; MacDonald D; Nie YX; Patton JT; Breusch SJ; Howie CR; Biant LC
Bone Joint J; 2013 Jan; 95-B(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 23307673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Oxford Knee Score: cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Turkish version in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee.
Tuğay BU; Tuğay N; Güney H; Kınıklı Gİ; Yüksel İ; Atilla B
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2016; 50(2):198-206. PubMed ID: 26969956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Health-related quality of life after total knee replacement or unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in an urban asian population.
Ko Y; Narayanasamy S; Wee HL; Lo NN; Yeo SJ; Yang KY; Yeo W; Chong HC; Thumboo J
Value Health; 2011; 14(2):322-8. PubMed ID: 21402300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of the EQ-5D-5L, EQ-VAS stand-alone component and Oxford knee score in the Australian knee arthroplasty population utilising minimally important difference, concurrent validity, predictive validity and responsiveness.
Lin DY; Cheok TS; Kaambwa B; Samson AJ; Morrison C; Chan T; Kroon HM; Jaarsma RL
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2023 May; 21(1):41. PubMed ID: 37165364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Can pain and function be distinguished in the Oxford Knee Score in a meaningful way? An exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis.
Harris K; Dawson J; Doll H; Field RE; Murray DW; Fitzpatrick R; Jenkinson C; Price AJ; Beard DJ
Qual Life Res; 2013 Nov; 22(9):2561-8. PubMed ID: 23526094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Extension from inpatients to outpatients: validity and reliability of the Oxford Knee Score in measuring health outcomes in patients with knee osteoarthritis.
Xie F; Ye H; Zhang Y; Liu X; Lei T; Li SC
Int J Rheum Dis; 2011 May; 14(2):206-10. PubMed ID: 21518321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Responsiveness of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) in Japanese patients with high tibial osteotomy.
Goldhahn S; Takeuchi R; Nakamura N; Nakamura R; Sawaguchi T
J Orthop Sci; 2017 Sep; 22(5):862-867. PubMed ID: 28599878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Estonian version of the Oxford Knee Score.
Raukas M; Metsna V; Tammaru M
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2022 Jan; 56(1):53-57. PubMed ID: 35234130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validation of the Spanish Version of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) for Elderly Patients With Total Knee Replacement.
Lizaur-Utilla A; Miralles-Muñoz FA; Gonzalez-Parreño S; Lopez-Prats FA
J Orthop Res; 2019 Oct; 37(10):2157-2162. PubMed ID: 31161609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The minimal clinically important difference in the Oxford knee score and Short Form 12 score after total knee arthroplasty.
Clement ND; MacDonald D; Simpson AH
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2014 Aug; 22(8):1933-9. PubMed ID: 24253376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validation of a prediction model that allows direct comparison of the Oxford Knee Score and American Knee Society clinical rating system.
Maempel JF; Clement ND; Brenkel IJ; Walmsley PJ
Bone Joint J; 2015 Apr; 97-B(4):503-9. PubMed ID: 25820889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Responsiveness and clinically important differences for the WOMAC and SF-36 after total knee replacement.
Escobar A; Quintana JM; Bilbao A; Aróstegui I; Lafuente I; Vidaurreta I
Osteoarthritis Cartilage; 2007 Mar; 15(3):273-80. PubMed ID: 17052924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of Singapore English and Chinese Versions of the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) in knee osteoarthritis patients undergoing total knee replacement.
Xie F; Li SC; Lo NN; Yeo SJ; Yang KY; Yeo W; Chong HC; Fong KY; Thumboo J
Osteoarthritis Cartilage; 2007 Sep; 15(9):1019-24. PubMed ID: 17408984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Minimal important change values for the Oxford Knee Score and the Forgotten Joint Score at 1 year after total knee replacement.
Ingelsrud LH; Roos EM; Terluin B; Gromov K; Husted H; Troelsen A
Acta Orthop; 2018 Oct; 89(5):541-547. PubMed ID: 29860936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
