203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23463550)
1. Intestinal integrity, endotoxin transport and detoxification in pigs divergently selected for residual feed intake.
Mani V; Harris AJ; Keating AF; Weber TE; Dekkers JC; Gabler NK
J Anim Sci; 2013 May; 91(5):2141-50. PubMed ID: 23463550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Improved nutrient digestibility and retention partially explains feed efficiency gains in pigs selected for low residual feed intake.
Harris AJ; Patience JF; Lonergan SM; J M Dekkers C; Gabler NK
J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90 Suppl 4():164-6. PubMed ID: 23365317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pigs that are divergent in feed efficiency, differ in intestinal enzyme and nutrient transporter gene expression, nutrient digestibility and microbial activity.
Vigors S; Sweeney T; O'Shea CJ; Kelly AK; O'Doherty JV
Animal; 2016 Nov; 10(11):1848-1855. PubMed ID: 27173889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of hygiene of housing conditions on performance and health of two pig genetic lines divergent for residual feed intake.
Chatelet A; Gondret F; Merlot E; Gilbert H; Friggens NC; Le Floc'h N
Animal; 2018 Feb; 12(2):350-358. PubMed ID: 28651668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Responses to weaning in two pig lines divergently selected for residual feed intake depending on diet.
Gilbert H; Ruesche J; Muller N; Billon Y; Begos V; Montagne L
J Anim Sci; 2019 Jan; 97(1):43-54. PubMed ID: 30371782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of immune system stimulation and divergent selection for residual feed intake on digestive capacity of the small intestine in growing pigs.
Rakhshandeh A; Dekkers JC; Kerr BJ; Weber TE; English J; Gabler NK
J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90 Suppl 4():233-5. PubMed ID: 23365340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of selection for residual feed intake during the grow/finish phase of production on sow reproductive performance and lactation efficiency.
Young JM; Bergsma R; Knol EF; Patience JF; Dekkers JC
J Anim Sci; 2016 Oct; 94(10):4120-4132. PubMed ID: 27898858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae and Lawsonia intracellularis on the performance of pigs divergently selected for feed efficiency.
Helm ET; Outhouse AC; Schwartz KJ; Dekkers JCM; Lonergan SM; Rauw WM; Gabler NK
J Anim Sci; 2018 Mar; 96(2):462-472. PubMed ID: 29385478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Effect of Divergence in Feed Efficiency on the Intestinal Microbiota and the Intestinal Immune Response in Both Unchallenged and Lipopolysaccharide Challenged Ileal and Colonic Explants.
Vigors S; O'Doherty JV; Kelly AK; O'Shea CJ; Sweeney T
PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0148145. PubMed ID: 26840831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Metabolic changes and tissue responses to selection on residual feed intake in growing pigs.
Le Naou T; Le Floc'h N; Louveau I; Gilbert H; Gondret F
J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90(13):4771-80. PubMed ID: 22871936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of residual feed intake on hypothalamic gene expression and meat quality in Angus-sired cattle grown during the hot season.
Perkins SD; Key CN; Marvin MN; Garrett CF; Foradori CD; Bratcher CL; Kriese-Anderson LA; Brandebourg TD
J Anim Sci; 2014 Apr; 92(4):1451-61. PubMed ID: 24663166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Residual feed intake studies in Angus-sired cattle reveal a potential role for hypothalamic gene expression in regulating feed efficiency.
Perkins SD; Key CN; Garrett CF; Foradori CD; Bratcher CL; Kriese-Anderson LA; Brandebourg TD
J Anim Sci; 2014 Feb; 92(2):549-60. PubMed ID: 24398827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Analysis of the basal colonic innate immune response of pigs divergent in feed efficiency and following an ex vivo lipopolysaccharide challenge.
Vigors S; O' Doherty JV; Ryan M; Sweeney T
Physiol Genomics; 2019 Sep; 51(9):443-448. PubMed ID: 31322475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Composition and quality characteristics of carcasses from pigs divergently selected for residual feed intake on high- or low-energy diets.
Arkfeld EK; Young JM; Johnson RC; Fedler CA; Prusa K; Patience JF; Dekkers JC; Gabler NK; Lonergan SM; Huff-Lonergan E
J Anim Sci; 2015 May; 93(5):2530-45. PubMed ID: 26020348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Interactions between metabolically active bacteria and host gene expression at the cecal mucosa in pigs of diverging feed efficiency.
Metzler-Zebeli BU; Lawlor PG; Magowan E; Zebeli Q
J Anim Sci; 2018 Jun; 96(6):2249-2264. PubMed ID: 29746643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of thermal heat stress on energy utilization in two lines of pigs divergently selected for residual feed intake.
Renaudeau D; Frances G; Dubois S; Gilbert H; Noblet J
J Anim Sci; 2013 Mar; 91(3):1162-75. PubMed ID: 23296816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Animals selected for postweaning weight gain rate have similar maintenance energy requirements regardless of their residual feed intake classification.
Batalha CDA; Tedeschi LO; de Araújo FL; Branco RH; Cyrillo JNDSG; Bonilha SFM
J Anim Sci; 2021 Mar; 99(3):. PubMed ID: 33674822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Physiological response to the weaning in two pig lines divergently selected for residual feed intake.
Montagne L; Gilbert H; Muller N; Le Floc'h N
J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl); 2022 Jul; 106(4):802-812. PubMed ID: 34351031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bayesian analysis of the effect of selection for residual feed intake on growth and feed intake curves in Yorkshire swine.
Cai W; Kaiser MS; Dekkers JC
J Anim Sci; 2012 Jan; 90(1):127-41. PubMed ID: 21873534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Colonic microbiome profiles for improved feed efficiency can be identified despite major effects of farm of origin and contemporary group in pigs.
Vigors S; O' Doherty JV; Sweeney T
Animal; 2020 Dec; 14(12):2472-2480. PubMed ID: 32605690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
