These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Disentangling preference ratings of concert hall acoustics using subjective sensory profiles. Lokki T; Pätynen J; Kuusinen A; Tervo S J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Nov; 132(5):3148-61. PubMed ID: 23145600 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of interaural-level-difference fluctuations on the externalization of sound. Catic J; Santurette S; Buchholz JM; Gran F; Dau T J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):1232-41. PubMed ID: 23927121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The influence of signal type on perceived reverberance. Teret E; Pastore MT; Braasch J J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):1675. PubMed ID: 28372042 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of spectral overlap on the echo suppression threshold for single reflection conditions. Walther A; Robinson P; Santala O J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):EL158-64. PubMed ID: 23927219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of diffuse reflections on spatial discrimination in a simulated concert hall. Robinson P; Pätynen J; Lokki T J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):EL370-6. PubMed ID: 23656096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The just noticeable difference of center time and clarity index in large reverberant spaces. Martellotta F J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Aug; 128(2):654-63. PubMed ID: 20707435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Blind single-channel suppression of late reverberation based on perceptual reverberation modeling. Tsilfidis A; Mourjopoulos J J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Mar; 129(3):1439-51. PubMed ID: 21428508 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Engaging concert hall acoustics is made up of temporal envelope preserving reflections. Lokki T; Pätynen J; Tervo S; Siltanen S; Savioja L J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jun; 129(6):EL223-8. PubMed ID: 21682356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The sound strength parameter G and its importance in evaluating and planning the acoustics of halls for music. Beranek L J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 May; 129(5):3020-6. PubMed ID: 21568405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Music to electric ears: pitch and timbre perception by cochlear implant patients. Pressnitzer D; Bestel J; Fraysse B Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2005 Dec; 1060():343-5. PubMed ID: 16597784 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Predicting speech intelligibility based on the signal-to-noise envelope power ratio after modulation-frequency selective processing. Jørgensen S; Dau T J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1475-87. PubMed ID: 21895088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Analysis of concert hall acoustics via visualizations of time-frequency and spatiotemporal responses. Pätynen J; Tervo S; Lokki T J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Feb; 133(2):842-57. PubMed ID: 23363103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Spatial perception of sound fields recorded by spherical microphone arrays with varying spatial resolution. Avni A; Ahrens J; Geier M; Spors S; Wierstorf H; Rafaely B J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):2711-21. PubMed ID: 23654379 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of loudness on the reverberance of music: reverberance prediction using loudness models. Lee D; Cabrera D; Martens WL J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Feb; 131(2):1194-205. PubMed ID: 22352494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Lateral reflections are favorable in concert halls due to binaural loudness. Lokki T; Pätynen J J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):EL345-51. PubMed ID: 22088039 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]