298 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23464040)
21. Signal-to-noise ratio adaptive post-filtering method for intelligibility enhancement of telephone speech.
Jokinen E; Yrttiaho S; Pulakka H; Vainio M; Alku P
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Dec; 132(6):3990-4001. PubMed ID: 23231128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Modeling the effects of a single reflection on binaural speech intelligibility.
Rennies J; Warzybok A; Brand T; Kollmeier B
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1556-67. PubMed ID: 24606290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The potential of onset enhancement for increased speech intelligibility in auditory prostheses.
Koning R; Wouters J
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2569-81. PubMed ID: 23039450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The optimal ratio time-frequency mask for speech separation in terms of the signal-to-noise ratio.
Liang S; Liu W; Jiang W; Xue W
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Nov; 134(5):EL452-8. PubMed ID: 24181990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Ideal time-frequency masking algorithms lead to different speech intelligibility and quality in normal-hearing and cochlear implant listeners.
Koning R; Madhu N; Wouters J
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2015 Jan; 62(1):331-41. PubMed ID: 25167542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Effects of reverberation and masker fluctuations on binaural unmasking of speech.
George EL; Festen JM; Goverts ST
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1581-91. PubMed ID: 22978887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Time course of a perceptual enhancement effect for noise-masked speech in reverberant environments.
Brandewie E; Zahorik P
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):EL265-70. PubMed ID: 23927235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The effects of binaural spectral resolution mismatch on Mandarin speech perception in simulated electric hearing.
Chen F; Wong LL; Tahmina Q; Azimi B; Hu Y
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):EL142-8. PubMed ID: 22894313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The effects of reverberant self- and overlap-masking on speech recognition in cochlear implant listeners.
Desmond JM; Collins LM; Throckmorton CS
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jun; 135(6):EL304-10. PubMed ID: 24907838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. An evaluation of objective measures for intelligibility prediction of time-frequency weighted noisy speech.
Taal CH; Hendriks RC; Heusdens R; Jensen J
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):3013-27. PubMed ID: 22087929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The effect of noise envelope modulation on quality judgments of noisy speech.
Jin IK; Kates JM; Arehart KH
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):EL277-83. PubMed ID: 23039565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Speech intelligibility prediction in reverberation: Towards an integrated model of speech transmission, spatial unmasking, and binaural de-reverberation.
Leclère T; Lavandier M; Culling JF
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3335-45. PubMed ID: 26093423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The concept of signal-to-noise ratio in the modulation domain and speech intelligibility.
Dubbelboer F; Houtgast T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Dec; 124(6):3937-46. PubMed ID: 19206818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Effect of spectral resolution on the intelligibility of ideal binary masked speech.
Li N; Loizou PC
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Apr; 123(4):EL59-64. PubMed ID: 18396922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. An algorithm that improves speech intelligibility in noise for normal-hearing listeners.
Kim G; Lu Y; Hu Y; Loizou PC
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Sep; 126(3):1486-94. PubMed ID: 19739761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Information-bearing acoustic change outperforms duration in predicting intelligibility of full-spectrum and noise-vocoded sentences.
Stilp CE
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1518-29. PubMed ID: 24606287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A deep learning based segregation algorithm to increase speech intelligibility for hearing-impaired listeners in reverberant-noisy conditions.
Zhao Y; Wang D; Johnson EM; Healy EW
J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Sep; 144(3):1627. PubMed ID: 30424625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Perceptual integration between target speech and target-speech reflection reduces masking for target-speech recognition in younger adults and older adults.
Huang Y; Huang Q; Chen X; Qu T; Wu X; Li L
Hear Res; 2008 Oct; 244(1-2):51-65. PubMed ID: 18694813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Real-time multiband dynamic compression and noise reduction for binaural hearing aids.
Kollmeier B; Peissig J; Hohmann V
J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(1):82-94. PubMed ID: 8263832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Recognition of speech in noise after application of time-frequency masks: dependence on frequency and threshold parameters.
Sinex DG
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Apr; 133(4):2390-6. PubMed ID: 23556604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
