These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

298 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23464040)

  • 41. Intelligibility of time-compressed speech: the effect of uniform versus non-uniform time-compression algorithms.
    Schlueter A; Lemke U; Kollmeier B; Holube I
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1541-55. PubMed ID: 24606289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Towards undistorted and noise-free speech in an MRI scanner: correlation subtraction followed by spectral noise gating.
    Inouye JM; Blemker SS; Inouye DI
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1019-22. PubMed ID: 24606243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Evaluation of a spectral subtraction strategy to suppress reverberant energy in cochlear implant devices.
    Kokkinakis K; Runge C; Tahmina Q; Hu Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jul; 138(1):115-24. PubMed ID: 26233012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Auditory and auditory-visual intelligibility of speech in fluctuating maskers for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Bernstein JG; Grant KW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3358-72. PubMed ID: 19425676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Effects of noise suppression on intelligibility: dependency on signal-to-noise ratios.
    Hilkhuysen G; Gaubitch N; Brookes M; Huckvale M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jan; 131(1):531-9. PubMed ID: 22280614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. A multi-resolution envelope-power based model for speech intelligibility.
    Jørgensen S; Ewert SD; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jul; 134(1):436-46. PubMed ID: 23862819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Sentence perception in listening conditions having similar speech intelligibility indices.
    Gustafson SJ; Pittman AL
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Jan; 50(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 21047291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Computational speech segregation based on an auditory-inspired modulation analysis.
    May T; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Dec; 136(6):3350. PubMed ID: 25480079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Temporal resolution analysis in frequency domain linear prediction.
    Ganapathy S; Hermansky H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Nov; 132(5):EL436-42. PubMed ID: 23145707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Conversational quality evaluation of artificial bandwidth extension of telephone speech.
    Pulakka H; Laaksonen L; Yrttiaho S; Myllylä V; Alku P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):848-61. PubMed ID: 22894208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Understanding speech when wearing communication headsets and hearing protectors with subband processing.
    Brammer AJ; Yu G; Bernstein ER; Cherniack MG; Peterson DR; Tufts JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):671-81. PubMed ID: 25096102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Blind single-channel suppression of late reverberation based on perceptual reverberation modeling.
    Tsilfidis A; Mourjopoulos J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Mar; 129(3):1439-51. PubMed ID: 21428508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Comparison of a short-time speech-based intelligibility metric to the speech transmission index and intelligibility data.
    Payton KL; Shrestha M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Nov; 134(5):3818-27. PubMed ID: 24180791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The relative importance of spectral cues for vowel recognition in severe noise.
    Swanepoel R; Oosthuizen DJ; Hanekom JJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2652-62. PubMed ID: 23039458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Relationship between speech recognition in noise and sparseness.
    Li G; Lutman ME; Wang S; Bleeck S
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Feb; 51(2):75-82. PubMed ID: 22107445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Spectral contrast enhancement of speech in noise for listeners with sensorineural hearing impairment: effects on intelligibility, quality, and response times.
    Baer T; Moore BC; Gatehouse S
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(1):49-72. PubMed ID: 8263829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Objective performance analysis of spherical microphone arrays for speech enhancement in rooms.
    Peled Y; Rafaely B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1473-81. PubMed ID: 22978876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Effects of noise suppression on intelligibility. II: An attempt to validate physical metrics.
    Hilkhuysen G; Gaubitch N; Brookes M; Huckvale M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jan; 135(1):439-50. PubMed ID: 24437784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Cochlear implant speech intelligibility outcomes with structured and unstructured binary mask errors.
    Kressner AA; Westermann A; Buchholz JM; Rozell CJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Feb; 139(2):800-10. PubMed ID: 26936562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Detection of shouted speech in noise: human and machine.
    Pohjalainen J; Raitio T; Yrttiaho S; Alku P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Apr; 133(4):2377-89. PubMed ID: 23556603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.