83 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23464285)
1. Patchwork reconstruction with resolution modeling for digital breast tomosynthesis.
Michielsen K; Van Slambrouck K; Jerebko A; Nuyts J
Med Phys; 2013 Mar; 40(3):031105. PubMed ID: 23464285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Multiscale bilateral filtering for improving image quality in digital breast tomosynthesis.
Lu Y; Chan HP; Wei J; Hadjiiski LM; Samala RK
Med Phys; 2015 Jan; 42(1):182-95. PubMed ID: 25563259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Selective-diffusion regularization for enhancement of microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis reconstruction.
Lu Y; Chan HP; Wei J; Hadjiiski LM
Med Phys; 2010 Nov; 37(11):6003-14. PubMed ID: 21158312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Importance of point-by-point back projection correction for isocentric motion in digital breast tomosynthesis: relevance to morphology of structures such as microcalcifications.
Chen Y; Lo JY; Dobbins JT
Med Phys; 2007 Oct; 34(10):3885-92. PubMed ID: 17985634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Multigrid reconstruction with block-iterative updates for breast tomosynthesis.
Michielsen K; Nuyts J
Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6537-48. PubMed ID: 26520744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Task-based performance analysis of FBP, SART and ML for digital breast tomosynthesis using signal CNR and Channelised Hotelling Observers.
Van de Sompel D; Brady SM; Boone J
Med Image Anal; 2011 Feb; 15(1):53-70. PubMed ID: 20713313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Observation of super-resolution in digital breast tomosynthesis.
Acciavatti RJ; Maidment AD
Med Phys; 2012 Dec; 39(12):7518-39. PubMed ID: 23231301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Statistical iterative reconstruction to improve image quality for digital breast tomosynthesis.
Xu S; Lu J; Zhou O; Chen Y
Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 42(9):5377-90. PubMed ID: 26328987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Visual-search observers for assessing tomographic x-ray image quality.
Gifford HC; Liang Z; Das M
Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 43(3):1563-75. PubMed ID: 26936739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The simulation of 3D microcalcification clusters in 2D digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis.
Shaheen E; Van Ongeval C; Zanca F; Cockmartin L; Marshall N; Jacobs J; Young KC; R Dance D; Bosmans H
Med Phys; 2011 Dec; 38(12):6659-71. PubMed ID: 22149848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of reconstruction algorithms for C-arm mammography tomosynthesis.
Rakowski JT; Dennis MJ
Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):3018-32. PubMed ID: 16964880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Oblique reconstructions in tomosynthesis. II. Super-resolution.
Acciavatti RJ; Maidment AD
Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111912. PubMed ID: 24320445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Detector Blur and Correlated Noise Modeling for Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Reconstruction.
Zheng J; Fessler JA; Chan HP
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2018 Jan; 37(1):116-127. PubMed ID: 28767366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of reconstruction algorithms for breast tomosynthesis.
Wu T; Moore RH; Rafferty EA; Kopans DB
Med Phys; 2004 Sep; 31(9):2636-47. PubMed ID: 15487747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quantitative imaging in breast tomosynthesis and CT: comparison of detection and estimation task performance.
Richard S; Samei E
Med Phys; 2010 Jun; 37(6):2627-37. PubMed ID: 20632574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of clinical full field digital mammography with the task specific system-model-based Fourier Hotelling observer (SMFHO) SNR.
Liu H; Chakrabarti K; Kaczmarek RV; Benevides L; Gu S; Kyprianou IS
Med Phys; 2014 May; 41(5):051907. PubMed ID: 24784386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of digital breast tomosynthesis reconstruction algorithms using synchrotron radiation in standard geometry.
Bliznakova K; Kolitsi Z; Speller RD; Horrocks JA; Tromba G; Pallikarakis N
Med Phys; 2010 Apr; 37(4):1893-903. PubMed ID: 20443511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of ray profile modeling on resolution recovery in clinical CT.
Hofmann C; Knaup M; Kachelrieß M
Med Phys; 2014 Feb; 41(2):021907. PubMed ID: 24506628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantification of Al-equivalent thickness of just visible microcalcifications in full field digital mammograms.
Carton AK; Bosmans H; Vandenbroucke D; Souverijns G; Van Ongeval C; Dragusin O; Marchal G
Med Phys; 2004 Jul; 31(7):2165-76. PubMed ID: 15305471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Image quality evaluation of breast tomosynthesis with synchrotron radiation.
Malliori A; Bliznakova K; Speller RD; Horrocks JA; Rigon L; Tromba G; Pallikarakis N
Med Phys; 2012 Sep; 39(9):5621-34. PubMed ID: 22957628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
