These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23465156)

  • 1. Improving the durability of digital flexible ureteroscopes.
    Karaolides T; Bach C; Kachrilas S; Goyal A; Masood J; Buchholz N
    Urology; 2013 Apr; 81(4):717-22. PubMed ID: 23465156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Location and etiology of flexible and semirigid ureteroscope damage.
    Sung JC; Springhart WP; Marguet CG; L'Esperance JO; Tan YH; Albala DM; Preminger GM
    Urology; 2005 Nov; 66(5):958-63. PubMed ID: 16286103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Durability of flexible ureteroscopes: a randomized, prospective study.
    Monga M; Best S; Venkatesh R; Ames C; Lee C; Kuskowski M; Schwartz S; Vanlangendock R; Skenazy J; Landman J
    J Urol; 2006 Jul; 176(1):137-41. PubMed ID: 16753388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Frequency of ureteroscope damage seen at a tertiary care center.
    Carey RI; Gomez CS; Maurici G; Lynne CM; Leveillee RJ; Bird VG
    J Urol; 2006 Aug; 176(2):607-10; discussion 610. PubMed ID: 16813899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prospective evaluation of refurbished flexible ureteroscope durability seen in a large public tertiary care center with multiple surgeons.
    Carey RI; Martin CJ; Knego JR
    Urology; 2014 Jul; 84(1):42-5. PubMed ID: 24837456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of the mechanisms of damage to flexible ureteroscopes and suggestions for ureteroscope preservation.
    Sooriakumaran P; Kaba R; Andrews HO; Buchholz NP
    Asian J Androl; 2005 Dec; 7(4):433-8. PubMed ID: 16281093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Durability of Flexible Ureteroscopes: A Prospective Evaluation of Longevity, the Factors that Affect it, and Damage Mechanisms.
    Legemate JD; Kamphuis GM; Freund JE; Baard J; Zanetti SP; Catellani M; Oussoren HW; de la Rosette JJ
    Eur Urol Focus; 2019 Nov; 5(6):1105-1111. PubMed ID: 29534873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of the pressure leak test in increasing the lifespan of flexible ureteroscopes.
    Khan F; Mukhtar S; Marsh H; Anjum F; Madaan S; Dickinson IK; Sriprasad S
    Int J Clin Pract; 2013 Oct; 67(10):1040-3. PubMed ID: 24073976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Flexible ureteroscopes: a single center evaluation of the durability and function of the new endoscopes smaller than 9Fr.
    Afane JS; Olweny EO; Bercowsky E; Sundaram CP; Dunn MD; Shalhav AL; McDougall EM; Clayman RV
    J Urol; 2000 Oct; 164(4):1164-8. PubMed ID: 10992358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A new era: performance and limitations of the latest models of flexible ureteroscopes.
    Multescu R; Geavlete B; Geavlete P
    Urology; 2013 Dec; 82(6):1236-9. PubMed ID: 23992972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In vitro comparison of a disposable flexible ureteroscope and conventional flexible ureteroscopes.
    Boylu U; Oommen M; Thomas R; Lee BR
    J Urol; 2009 Nov; 182(5):2347-51. PubMed ID: 19758626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Durability of Digital Flexible Ureteroscope in University Hospital and Ambulatory Surgical Center: Is It Time to Rethink?
    Banerjee I; Katz JE; Bhattu AS; Soodana NP; Deane LA; Marcovich R; Shah HN
    J Endourol; 2021 Mar; 35(3):289-295. PubMed ID: 32998577
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Single-use disposable digital flexible ureteroscopes: an ex vivo assessment and cost analysis.
    Hennessey DB; Fojecki GL; Papa NP; Lawrentschuk N; Bolton D
    BJU Int; 2018 May; 121 Suppl 3():55-61. PubMed ID: 29656467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Durability of the next-generation flexible fiberoptic ureteroscopes: a randomized prospective multi-institutional clinical trial.
    Knudsen B; Miyaoka R; Shah K; Holden T; Turk TM; Pedro RN; Kriedberg C; Hinck B; Ortiz-Alvarado O; Monga M
    Urology; 2010 Mar; 75(3):534-8. PubMed ID: 19854494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The "Body Mass Index" of Flexible Ureteroscopes.
    Proietti S; Somani B; Sofer M; Pietropaolo A; Rosso M; Saitta G; Gaboardi F; Traxer O; Giusti G
    J Endourol; 2017 Oct; 31(10):1090-1095. PubMed ID: 28835120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Rapid communication: effects of Steris 1 sterilization and Cidex ortho-phthalaldehyde high-level disinfection on durability of new-generation flexible ureteroscopes.
    Abraham JB; Abdelshehid CS; Lee HJ; Box GN; Deane LA; Le T; Jellison F; Borin JF; Manipon A; McDougall EM; Clayman RV
    J Endourol; 2007 Sep; 21(9):985-92. PubMed ID: 17941773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Independent analysis of Olympus flexible ureteroscope repairs.
    Canales BK; Gleason JM; Hicks N; Monga M
    Urology; 2007 Jul; 70(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 17656198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of flexible ureteroscopes: deflection, irrigant flow and optical characteristics.
    Abdelshehid C; Ahlering MT; Chou D; Park HK; Basillote J; Lee D; Kim I; Eichel L; Protsenko D; Wong B; McDougall E; Clayman RV
    J Urol; 2005 Jun; 173(6):2017-21. PubMed ID: 15879808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Surgical technique to achieve high durability of flexible ureteroscopes: A single hospital experience.
    Lin CC; Wu LS; Huang SS; Lin CF; Chen WH; Wu CT
    Biomed J; 2018 Dec; 41(6):385-390. PubMed ID: 30709581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Physical properties of flexible ureteroscopes: implications for clinical practice.
    Monga M; Anderson KJ; Durfee W
    J Endourol; 2004 Jun; 18(5):462-5. PubMed ID: 15253821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.