These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23465309)

  • 1. Element partitioning in combustion- and gasification-based waste-to-energy units.
    Arena U; Di Gregorio F
    Waste Manag; 2013 May; 33(5):1142-50. PubMed ID: 23465309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A new gasification and melting incineration process of MSW with co-current shaft furnace.
    Zhao W; Wang Q; Zou Z; Liu H; Zheng H; Zhang L
    J Environ Sci (China); 2009; 21 Suppl 1():S108-11. PubMed ID: 25084404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A life cycle assessment of environmental performances of two combustion- and gasification-based waste-to-energy technologies.
    Arena U; Ardolino F; Di Gregorio F
    Waste Manag; 2015 Jul; 41():60-74. PubMed ID: 25899036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Co-gasification of municipal solid waste and material recovery in a large-scale gasification and melting system.
    Tanigaki N; Manako K; Osada M
    Waste Manag; 2012 Apr; 32(4):667-75. PubMed ID: 22093706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Converting moving-grate incineration from combustion to gasification - numerical simulation of the burning characteristics.
    Yang YB; Sharifi VN; Swithenbank J
    Waste Manag; 2007; 27(5):645-55. PubMed ID: 16730435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Characterisation of major component leaching and buffering capacity of RDF incineration and gasification bottom ash in relation to reuse or disposal scenarios.
    Rocca S; van Zomeren A; Costa G; Dijkstra JJ; Comans RN; Lombardi F
    Waste Manag; 2012 Apr; 32(4):759-68. PubMed ID: 22226920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Technical assessment of the CLEERGAS moving grate-based process for energy generation from municipal solid waste.
    Lusardi MR; Kohn M; Themelis NJ; Castaldi MJ
    Waste Manag Res; 2014 Aug; 32(8):772-81. PubMed ID: 25096323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Waste gasification vs. conventional Waste-to-Energy: a comparative evaluation of two commercial technologies.
    Consonni S; Viganò F
    Waste Manag; 2012 Apr; 32(4):653-66. PubMed ID: 22285961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Partitioning characteristics and particle size distributions of heavy metals in the O2/RFG waste incineration system.
    Chen JC; Huang JS
    J Hazard Mater; 2009 Dec; 172(2-3):826-32. PubMed ID: 19679392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Process and technological aspects of municipal solid waste gasification. A review.
    Arena U
    Waste Manag; 2012 Apr; 32(4):625-39. PubMed ID: 22035903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Energy from Waste--clean, efficient, renewable: transitions in combustion efficiency and NOx control.
    Waldner MH; Halter R; Sigg A; Brosch B; Gehrmann HJ; Keunecke M
    Waste Manag; 2013 Feb; 33(2):317-26. PubMed ID: 23044260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Characteristics of elements in waste ashes from a solid waste incinerator in Taiwan.
    Chang CY; Wang CF; Mui DT; Cheng MT; Chiang HL
    J Hazard Mater; 2009 Jun; 165(1-3):766-73. PubMed ID: 19046804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Metal distribution in incineration residues of municipal solid waste (MSW) in Japan.
    Jung CH; Matsuto T; Tanaka N; Okada T
    Waste Manag; 2004; 24(4):381-91. PubMed ID: 15081066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of the characteristics of bottom and fly ashes generated from various incineration processes.
    Chang FY; Wey MY
    J Hazard Mater; 2006 Dec; 138(3):594-603. PubMed ID: 16839684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A case-study of landfill minimization and material recovery via waste co-gasification in a new waste management scheme.
    Tanigaki N; Ishida Y; Osada M
    Waste Manag; 2015 Mar; 37():137-46. PubMed ID: 25182227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Process aspects in combustion and gasification Waste-to-Energy (WtE) units.
    Leckner B
    Waste Manag; 2015 Mar; 37():13-25. PubMed ID: 24846797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The behaviour of ashes and heavy metals during the co-combustion of sewage sludges in a fluidised bed.
    Helena Lopes M; Abelha P; Lapa N; Oliveira JS; Cabrita I; Gulyurtlu I
    Waste Manag; 2003; 23(9):859-70. PubMed ID: 14583249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Competition of different methods for recovering energy from waste.
    Friege H; Fendel A
    Waste Manag Res; 2011 Oct; 29(10 Suppl):30-8. PubMed ID: 21824986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Technology of waste incineration].
    Thömen KH
    Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg B; 1983 Sep; 178(1-2):174-85. PubMed ID: 6649993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mechanisms contributing to the thermal analysis of waste incineration bottom ash and quantification of different carbon species.
    Rocca S; van Zomeren A; Costa G; Dijkstra JJ; Comans RN; Lombardi F
    Waste Manag; 2013 Feb; 33(2):373-81. PubMed ID: 23246084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.