BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

768 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23465313)

  • 21. Assessment of a landfill methane emission screening method using an unmanned aerial vehicle mounted thermal infrared camera - A field study.
    Fjelsted L; Christensen AG; Larsen JE; Kjeldsen P; Scheutz C
    Waste Manag; 2019 Mar; 87():893-904. PubMed ID: 29853253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Development of a low-maintenance measurement approach to continuously estimate methane emissions: A case study.
    Riddick SN; Hancock BR; Robinson AD; Connors S; Davies S; Allen G; Pitt J; Harris NRP
    Waste Manag; 2018 Mar; 73():210-219. PubMed ID: 28003116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Life-Cycle Assessment of a Regulatory Compliant U.S. Municipal Solid Waste Landfill.
    Wang Y; Levis JW; Barlaz MA
    Environ Sci Technol; 2021 Oct; 55(20):13583-13592. PubMed ID: 34597038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Measured gas emissions from four landfills in south africa and some implications for landfill design and methane recovery in semi-arid climates.
    Fourie AB; Morris JW
    Waste Manag Res; 2004 Dec; 22(6):440-53. PubMed ID: 15666447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Methodologies for measuring fugitive methane emissions from landfills - A review.
    Mønster J; Kjeldsen P; Scheutz C
    Waste Manag; 2019 Mar; 87():835-859. PubMed ID: 30660403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Emission assessment at the Burj Hammoud inactive municipal landfill: viability of landfill gas recovery under the clean development mechanism.
    El-Fadel M; Abi-Esber L; Salhab S
    Waste Manag; 2012 Nov; 32(11):2106-14. PubMed ID: 22265005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Methane mass balance at three landfill sites: what is the efficiency of capture by gas collection systems?
    Spokas K; Bogner J; Chanton JP; Morcet M; Aran C; Graff C; Golvan YM; Hebe I
    Waste Manag; 2006; 26(5):516-25. PubMed ID: 16198554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Quantification of methane emissions from 15 Danish landfills using the mobile tracer dispersion method.
    Mønster J; Samuelsson J; Kjeldsen P; Scheutz C
    Waste Manag; 2015 Jan; 35():177-86. PubMed ID: 25442105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluation and application of site-specific data to revise the first-order decay model for estimating landfill gas generation and emissions at Danish landfills.
    Mou Z; Scheutz C; Kjeldsen P
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2015 Jun; 65(6):686-98. PubMed ID: 25976482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Mitigation of methane emission from an old unlined landfill in Klintholm, Denmark using a passive biocover system.
    Scheutz C; Pedersen RB; Petersen PH; Jørgensen JH; Ucendo IM; Mønster JG; Samuelsson J; Kjeldsen P
    Waste Manag; 2014 Jul; 34(7):1179-90. PubMed ID: 24755356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Estimation of Gas Emissions using the LandGEM Model from the Landfill of Baft County, Kerman, Iran.
    Goushki MN; Shiri MA; Nozari M
    Environ Monit Assess; 2023 Nov; 195(12):1444. PubMed ID: 37946053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluation of stabilization status of the landfill layers by comparing long-term monitoring data of methane emission with FOD model estimate.
    Nishio T; Fukuyama J; Fukunaga I; Nishitani T; Takakura A; Sakai M; Masuda J
    Environ Technol; 2024 Jul; 45(18):3679-3691. PubMed ID: 37317953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Methane emissions from landfills in Serbia and potential mitigation strategies: a case study.
    Stanisavljevic N; Ubavin D; Batinic B; Fellner J; Vujic G
    Waste Manag Res; 2012 Oct; 30(10):1095-103. PubMed ID: 22751946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Development of correction factors for landfill gas emission model suiting Indian condition to predict methane emission from landfills.
    Sil A; Kumar S; Wong JW
    Bioresour Technol; 2014 Sep; 168():97-9. PubMed ID: 24685512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Life cycle GHG emissions of MSW landfilling versus Incineration: Expected outcomes based on US landfill gas collection regulations.
    Anshassi M; Smallwood T; Townsend TG
    Waste Manag; 2022 Apr; 142():44-54. PubMed ID: 35176598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Estimation of total landfill surface methane emissions using geospatial approach combined with measured surface ambient air methane concentrations.
    Abichou T; Del'Angel JM; Koloushani M; Stamatiou K; Belhadj Ali N; Green R
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2023 Dec; 73(12):902-913. PubMed ID: 37843284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Methane flux and oxidation at two types of intermediate landfill covers.
    Abichou T; Chanton J; Powelson D; Fleiger J; Escoriaza S; Lei Y; Stern J
    Waste Manag; 2006; 26(11):1305-12. PubMed ID: 16426833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Assessing methods to estimate emissions of non-methane organic compounds from landfills.
    Saquing JM; Chanton JP; Yazdani R; Barlaz MA; Scheutz C; Blake DR; Imhoff PT
    Waste Manag; 2014 Nov; 34(11):2260-70. PubMed ID: 25108756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Estimation of fugitive landfill methane emissions using surface emission monitoring and Genetic Algorithms optimization.
    Kormi T; Mhadhebi S; Bel Hadj Ali N; Abichou T; Green R
    Waste Manag; 2018 Feb; 72():313-328. PubMed ID: 27887773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Characteristics of environmental factors and their effects on CH4 and CO2 emissions from a closed landfill: an ecological case study of Shanghai.
    Xiaoli C; Ziyang L; Shimaoka T; Nakayama H; Ying Z; Xiaoyan C; Komiya T; Ishizaki T; Youcai Z
    Waste Manag; 2010 Mar; 30(3):446-51. PubMed ID: 19880303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 39.