These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23465737)
1. Effect of adding screening ultrasonography to screening mammography on patient recall and cancer detection rates: a retrospective study in Japan. Tohno E; Umemoto T; Sasaki K; Morishima I; Ueno E Eur J Radiol; 2013 Aug; 82(8):1227-30. PubMed ID: 23465737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of screening whole-breast sonography as a supplemental tool in conjunction with mammography in women with dense breasts. Chae EY; Kim HH; Cha JH; Shin HJ; Kim H J Ultrasound Med; 2013 Sep; 32(9):1573-8. PubMed ID: 23980217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Screening US in patients with mammographically dense breasts: initial experience with Connecticut Public Act 09-41. Hooley RJ; Greenberg KL; Stackhouse RM; Geisel JL; Butler RS; Philpotts LE Radiology; 2012 Oct; 265(1):59-69. PubMed ID: 22723501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessing improvement in detection of breast cancer with three-dimensional automated breast US in women with dense breast tissue: the SomoInsight Study. Brem RF; Tabár L; Duffy SW; Inciardi MF; Guingrich JA; Hashimoto BE; Lander MR; Lapidus RL; Peterson MK; Rapelyea JA; Roux S; Schilling KJ; Shah BA; Torrente J; Wynn RT; Miller DP Radiology; 2015 Mar; 274(3):663-73. PubMed ID: 25329763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Relative and combined performance of mammography and ultrasonography for breast cancer screening in the general population: a pilot study in Tochigi Prefecture, Japan. Honjo S; Ando J; Tsukioka T; Morikubo H; Ichimura M; Sunagawa M; Hasegawa T; Watanabe T; Kodama T; Tominaga K; Sasagawa M; Koyama Y Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2007 Sep; 37(9):715-20. PubMed ID: 17766996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Breast cancer screening by mammography in women aged under 50 years in Japan. Morimoto T; Sasa M; Yamaguchi T; Kondo H; Akaiwa H; Sagara Y Anticancer Res; 2000; 20(5C):3689-94. PubMed ID: 11268440 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Combined screening with mammography and ultrasound in a population-based screening program. Buchberger W; Geiger-Gritsch S; Knapp R; Gautsch K; Oberaigner W Eur J Radiol; 2018 Apr; 101():24-29. PubMed ID: 29571797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Recall and Cancer Detection Rates for Screening Mammography: Finding the Sweet Spot. Grabler P; Sighoko D; Wang L; Allgood K; Ansell D AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Jan; 208(1):208-213. PubMed ID: 27680714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effectiveness of a Mobile Mammography Program. Stanley E; Lewis MC; Irshad A; Ackerman S; Collins H; Pavic D; Leddy RJ AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Dec; 209(6):1426-1429. PubMed ID: 28871806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Performance Goals for an Adjunct Diagnostic Test to Reduce Unnecessary Biopsies After Screening Mammography: Analysis of Costs, Benefits, and Consequences. Lee CI; Bensink ME; Berry K; Musa Z; Bodnar C; Dann R; Jarvik JG; Lehman CD; Ramsey SD J Am Coll Radiol; 2016 Nov; 13(11S):R81-R88. PubMed ID: 27814820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Analysis of the results of 137 subclinical breast lesions excisions. Value of ultrasonography in the early diagnosis of breast cancer]. Jacob D; Brombart JC; Muller C; Lefèbvre C; Massa F; Depoerck A J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1997; 26(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 9091540 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Screening ultrasonography revealed 15% of mammographically occult breast cancers. Uchida K; Yamashita A; Kawase K; Kamiya K Breast Cancer; 2008; 15(2):165-8. PubMed ID: 18224382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Promotion of quality-controlled mammography alone as a screening modality in Japan. Morimoto T; Tangoku A; Yamakawa T; Tsuruno M; Takashima S Breast Cancer; 2014 Jul; 21(4):435-41. PubMed ID: 23515946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Radiologist-performed hand-held ultrasound screening at average risk of breast cancer: results from a single health screening center. Chang JM; Koo HR; Moon WK Acta Radiol; 2015 Jun; 56(6):652-8. PubMed ID: 24951614 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Breast cancer screening using tomosynthesis in combination with digital mammography. Friedewald SM; Rafferty EA; Rose SL; Durand MA; Plecha DM; Greenberg JS; Hayes MK; Copit DS; Carlson KL; Cink TM; Barke LD; Greer LN; Miller DP; Conant EF JAMA; 2014 Jun; 311(24):2499-507. PubMed ID: 25058084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. Kolb TM; Lichy J; Newhouse JH Radiology; 2002 Oct; 225(1):165-75. PubMed ID: 12355001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Developing asymmetry identified on mammography: correlation with imaging outcome and pathologic findings. Leung JW; Sickles EA AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Mar; 188(3):667-75. PubMed ID: 17312052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Supplemental Screening Breast US in Women with Negative Mammographic Findings: Effect of Routine Axillary Scanning. Lee SH; Yi A; Jang MJ; Chang JM; Cho N; Moon WK Radiology; 2018 Mar; 286(3):830-837. PubMed ID: 29083988 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program: report on the first 4 years of mammography provided to medically underserved women. May DS; Lee NC; Nadel MR; Henson RM; Miller DS AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jan; 170(1):97-104. PubMed ID: 9423608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The influence of mammographic technologists on radiologists' ability to interpret screening mammograms in community practice. Henderson LM; Benefield T; Marsh MW; Schroeder BF; Durham DD; Yankaskas BC; Bowling JM Acad Radiol; 2015 Mar; 22(3):278-89. PubMed ID: 25435185 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]