BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

397 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23465874)

  • 1. A prospective comparison of 3 scoring systems in upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Wang CH; Chen YW; Young YR; Yang CJ; Chen IC
    Am J Emerg Med; 2013 May; 31(5):775-8. PubMed ID: 23465874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance of the Glasgow-Blatchford score in predicting clinical outcomes and intervention in hospitalized patients with upper GI bleeding.
    Bryant RV; Kuo P; Williamson K; Yam C; Schoeman MN; Holloway RH; Nguyen NQ
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Oct; 78(4):576-83. PubMed ID: 23790755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Risk stratification in acute upper GI bleeding: comparison of the AIMS65 score with the Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall scoring systems.
    Robertson M; Majumdar A; Boyapati R; Chung W; Worland T; Terbah R; Wei J; Lontos S; Angus P; Vaughan R
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Jun; 83(6):1151-60. PubMed ID: 26515955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Risk scoring systems to predict need for clinical intervention for patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding.
    Chen IC; Hung MS; Chiu TF; Chen JC; Hsiao CT
    Am J Emerg Med; 2007 Sep; 25(7):774-9. PubMed ID: 17870480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of risk scoring systems in predicting clinical outcome at upper gastrointestinal bleeding patients in an emergency unit.
    Dicu D; Pop F; Ionescu D; Dicu T
    Am J Emerg Med; 2013 Jan; 31(1):94-9. PubMed ID: 23000328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A modified Glasgow Blatchford Score improves risk stratification in upper gastrointestinal bleed: a prospective comparison of scoring systems.
    Cheng DW; Lu YW; Teller T; Sekhon HK; Wu BU
    Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2012 Oct; 36(8):782-9. PubMed ID: 22928529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of scoring systems without endoscopic findings for predicting outcomes in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Ko IG; Kim SE; Chang BS; Kwak MS; Yoon JY; Cha JM; Shin HP; Lee JI; Kim SH; Han JH; Jeon JW
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):159. PubMed ID: 29233096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Safe discharge of patients with low-risk upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB): can the use of Glasgow-Blatchford Bleeding Score be extended?
    Le Jeune IR; Gordon AL; Farrugia D; Manwani R; Guha IN; James MW
    Acute Med; 2011; 10(4):176-81. PubMed ID: 22111089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prospective comparison of three risk scoring systems in non-variceal and variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Thanapirom K; Ridtitid W; Rerknimitr R; Thungsuk R; Noophun P; Wongjitrat C; Luangjaru S; Vedkijkul P; Lertkupinit C; Poonsab S; Ratanachu-ek T; Hansomburana P; Pornthisarn B; Thongbai T; Mahachai V; Treeprasertsuk S
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2016 Apr; 31(4):761-7. PubMed ID: 26514879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. High Glasgow Blatchford Score at admission is associated with recurrent bleeding after discharge for patients hospitalized with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Sengupta N; Tapper EB; Patwardhan VR; Ketwaroo GA; Thaker AM; Leffler DA; Feuerstein JD
    Endoscopy; 2016 Jan; 48(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 26340604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of the Glasgow-Blatchford and AIMS65 scoring systems for risk stratification in upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the emergency department.
    Yaka E; Yılmaz S; Doğan NÖ; Pekdemir M
    Acad Emerg Med; 2015 Jan; 22(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 25556538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Upper gastrointestinal bleeding: predictors of risk in a mixed patient group including variceal and nonvariceal haemorrhage.
    Lahiff C; Shields W; Cretu I; Mahmud N; McKiernan S; Norris S; Silke B; Reynolds JV; O'Toole D
    Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2012 Feb; 24(2):149-54. PubMed ID: 22113209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prospective multicenter validation of the Glasgow Blatchford bleeding score in the management of patients with upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage presenting at an emergency department.
    Aquarius M; Smeets FG; Konijn HW; Stassen PM; Keulen ET; Van Deursen CT; Masclee AA; Keulemans YC
    Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2015 Sep; 27(9):1011-6. PubMed ID: 26049709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. External validation of scoring systems in risk stratification of upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Anchu AC; Mohsina S; Sureshkumar S; Mahalakshmy T; Kate V
    Indian J Gastroenterol; 2017 Mar; 36(2):105-112. PubMed ID: 28393330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of three risk scores to predict outcomes in upper gastrointestinal bleeding; modifying Glasgow-Blatchford with albumin.
    Shafaghi A; Gharibpoor F; Mahdipour Z; Samadani AA
    Rom J Intern Med; 2019 Dec; 57(4):322-333. PubMed ID: 31268861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Blatchford score is a useful tool for predicting the need for intervention in cancer patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Ahn S; Lim KS; Lee YS; Lee JL
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2013 Aug; 28(8):1288-94. PubMed ID: 23432611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of scoring systems for nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a multicenter prospective cohort study.
    Yang HM; Jeon SW; Jung JT; Lee DW; Ha CY; Park KS; Lee SH; Yang CH; Park JH; Park YS;
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2016 Jan; 31(1):119-25. PubMed ID: 26211939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validity of modified early warning, Glasgow Blatchford, and pre-endoscopic Rockall scores in predicting prognosis of patients presenting to emergency department with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Bozkurt S; Köse A; Arslan ED; Erdoğan S; Üçbilek E; Çevik İ; Ayrık C; Sezgin O
    Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med; 2015 Dec; 23():109. PubMed ID: 26714636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of AIMS65 Score and Other Scoring Systems for Predicting Clinical Outcomes in Koreans with Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.
    Park SM; Yeum SC; Kim BW; Kim JS; Kim JH; Sim EH; Ji JS; Choi H
    Gut Liver; 2016 Jul; 10(4):526-31. PubMed ID: 27377742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. AIMS65 scoring system is comparable to Glasgow-Blatchford score or Rockall score for prediction of clinical outcomes for non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Kim MS; Choi J; Shin WC
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2019 Jul; 19(1):136. PubMed ID: 31349816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.