These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23465981)

  • 1. CTLM as an adjunct to mammography in the diagnosis of patients with dense breast.
    Qi J; Ye Z
    Clin Imaging; 2013; 37(2):289-94. PubMed ID: 23465981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Near-infrared laser computed tomography of the breast first clinical experience.
    Poellinger A; Martin JC; Ponder SL; Freund T; Hamm B; Bick U; Diekmann F
    Acad Radiol; 2008 Dec; 15(12):1545-53. PubMed ID: 19000871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Characterization of benign and malignant breast lesions with computed tomography laser mammography (CTLM): initial experience.
    Floery D; Helbich TH; Riedl CC; Jaromi S; Weber M; Leodolter S; Fuchsjaeger MH
    Invest Radiol; 2005 Jun; 40(6):328-35. PubMed ID: 15905718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Computed tomography laser mammography].
    Bílková A; Janík V; Svoboda B
    Cas Lek Cesk; 2010; 149(2):61-5. PubMed ID: 20662467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computer-Assisted Diagnosis System for Breast Cancer in Computed Tomography Laser Mammography (CTLM).
    Jalalian A; Mashohor S; Mahmud R; Karasfi B; Iqbal Saripan M; Ramli AR
    J Digit Imaging; 2017 Dec; 30(6):796-811. PubMed ID: 28429195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Screening mammography-detected cancers: sensitivity of a computer-aided detection system applied to full-field digital mammograms.
    Yang SK; Moon WK; Cho N; Park JS; Cha JH; Kim SM; Kim SJ; Im JG
    Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):104-11. PubMed ID: 17507722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Impact of breast density on computer-aided detection (CAD) of breast cancer].
    Yang KY; Liu XJ; Zhai RY
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2012 May; 34(5):360-3. PubMed ID: 22883457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. To evaluate the role of sonography as an adjunct to mammography in women with dense breasts.
    Masroor I; Ahmed MN; Pasha S
    J Pak Med Assoc; 2009 May; 59(5):298-301. PubMed ID: 19438134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sensitivity of imaging for multifocal-multicentric breast carcinoma.
    Bozzini A; Renne G; Meneghetti L; Bandi G; Santos G; Vento AR; Menna S; Andrighetto S; Viale G; Cassano E; Bellomi M
    BMC Cancer; 2008 Sep; 8():275. PubMed ID: 18826585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. (99m)Tc sestamibi breast imaging for the examination of patients with dense and fatty breasts: multicenter study.
    Khalkhali I; Baum JK; Villanueva-Meyer J; Edell SL; Hanelin LG; Lugo CE; Taillefer R; Freeman LM; Neal CE; Scheff AM; Connolly JL; Schnitt SJ; Houlihan MJ; Sampalis JS; Haber SB
    Radiology; 2002 Jan; 222(1):149-55. PubMed ID: 11799940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Breast-specific gamma imaging for the detection of breast cancer in dense versus nondense breasts.
    Rechtman LR; Lenihan MJ; Lieberman JH; Teal CB; Torrente J; Rapelyea JA; Brem RF
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Feb; 202(2):293-8. PubMed ID: 24450668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Electrical impedance scanning in the differentiation of suspicious breast lesions: comparison with mammography, ultrasound and histopathology].
    Fuchsjäger MH; Helbich TH; Ringl H; Funovics MA; Rudas M; Riedl C; Pfarl G
    Rofo; 2002 Dec; 174(12):1522-9. PubMed ID: 12471524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Computer-aided detection system performance on current and previous digital mammograms in patients with contralateral metachronous breast cancer.
    Kim SJ; Moon WK; Cho N; Chang JM
    Acta Radiol; 2012 May; 53(4):376-81. PubMed ID: 22403080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Computer-aided classification of BI-RADS category 3 breast lesions.
    Buchbinder SS; Leichter IS; Lederman RB; Novak B; Bamberger PN; Sklair-Levy M; Yarmish G; Fields SI
    Radiology; 2004 Mar; 230(3):820-3. PubMed ID: 14739315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Malignant lesions on mammography: accuracy of two different computer-aided detection systems.
    Lobbes M; Smidt M; Keymeulen K; Girometti R; Zuiani C; Beets-Tan R; Wildberger J; Boetes C
    Clin Imaging; 2013; 37(2):283-8. PubMed ID: 23465980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Digital breast tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography: comparison of the accuracy of lesion measurement and characterization using specimens.
    Seo N; Kim HH; Shin HJ; Cha JH; Kim H; Moon JH; Gong G; Ahn SH; Son BH
    Acta Radiol; 2014 Jul; 55(6):661-7. PubMed ID: 24005560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evidence of the effect of adjunct ultrasound screening in women with mammography-negative dense breasts: interval breast cancers at 1 year follow-up.
    Corsetti V; Houssami N; Ghirardi M; Ferrari A; Speziani M; Bellarosa S; Remida G; Gasparotti C; Galligioni E; Ciatto S
    Eur J Cancer; 2011 May; 47(7):1021-6. PubMed ID: 21211962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Screening US in patients with mammographically dense breasts: initial experience with Connecticut Public Act 09-41.
    Hooley RJ; Greenberg KL; Stackhouse RM; Geisel JL; Butler RS; Philpotts LE
    Radiology; 2012 Oct; 265(1):59-69. PubMed ID: 22723501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparative study of breast-specific gamma imaging with the conventional imaging modality in breast cancer patients with dense breasts.
    Kim BS; Moon BI; Cha ES
    Ann Nucl Med; 2012 Dec; 26(10):823-9. PubMed ID: 22922890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Value of one-view breast tomosynthesis versus two-view mammography in diagnostic workup of women with clinical signs and symptoms and in women recalled from screening.
    Waldherr C; Cerny P; Altermatt HJ; Berclaz G; Ciriolo M; Buser K; Sonnenschein MJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Jan; 200(1):226-31. PubMed ID: 23255766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.