452 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23466719)
1. Staging and defining characteristics of pressure ulcers using photographs by staff nurses in acute care settings.
Jesada EC; Warren JI; Goodman D; Iliuta RW; Thurkauf G; McLaughlin MK; Johnson JE; Strassner L
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2013; 40(2):150-6. PubMed ID: 23466719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bates-Jensen wound assessment tool: pictorial guide validation project.
Harris C; Bates-Jensen B; Parslow N; Raizman R; Singh M; Ketchen R
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2010; 37(3):253-9. PubMed ID: 20386331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reliability and validity of a Turkish language version of the Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Tool.
Karahan A; Toruner EK; Ceylan A; Abbasoglu A; Tekindal A; Buyukgonenc L
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2014; 41(4):340-4. PubMed ID: 24988512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Photographic assessment of the appearance of chronic pressure and leg ulcers.
Houghton PE; Kincaid CB; Campbell KE; Woodbury MG; Keast DH
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2000 Apr; 46(4):20-6, 28-30. PubMed ID: 10788924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reliability of the European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel classification system.
Defloor T; Schoonhoven L; Katrien V; Weststrate J; Myny D
J Adv Nurs; 2006 Apr; 54(2):189-98. PubMed ID: 16553705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of in-person and digital photograph assessment of stage III and IV pressure ulcers among veterans with spinal cord injuries.
Terris DD; Woo C; Jarczok MN; Ho CH
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2011; 48(3):215-24. PubMed ID: 21480096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reducing hospital-acquired heel ulcer rates in an acute care facility: an evaluation of a nurse-driven performance improvement project.
McElhinny ML; Hooper C
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2008; 35(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 18199942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reliability of the Bates-Jensen wound assessment tool for pressure injury assessment: The pressure ulcer detection study.
Bates-Jensen BM; McCreath HE; Harputlu D; Patlan A
Wound Repair Regen; 2019 Jul; 27(4):386-395. PubMed ID: 30828890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Driving hospital-acquired pressure ulcers to zero.
Morehead D; Blain B
Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am; 2014 Dec; 26(4):559-67. PubMed ID: 25438897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. How accurate are pressure ulcer grades? An image-based survey of nurse performance.
Russell LJ; Reynolds TM
J Tissue Viability; 2001 Apr; 11(2):67, 70-5. PubMed ID: 11949377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Implementing a pressure ulcer prevention program and enhancing the role of the CWOCN: impact on outcomes.
Hiser B; Rochette J; Philbin S; Lowerhouse N; Terburgh C; Pietsch C
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2006 Feb; 52(2):48-59. PubMed ID: 16464994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validation of the NE1 wound assessment tool to improve staging of pressure ulcers on admission by registered nurses.
Lilly D; Estocado N; Spencer-Smith JB; Englebright J
J Nurs Meas; 2014; 22(3):438-50. PubMed ID: 25608430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of DESIGN-R, an assessment instrument for pressure ulcers .
Zhong X; Nagase T; Huang L; Kaitani T; Iizaka S; Yamamoto Y; Kanazawa T; Sanada H
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2013 Feb; 59(2):36-43. PubMed ID: 23388396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reliability and validity of the revised photographic wound assessment tool on digital images taken of various types of chronic wounds.
Thompson N; Gordey L; Bowles H; Parslow N; Houghton P
Adv Skin Wound Care; 2013 Aug; 26(8):360-73. PubMed ID: 23860221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Staging of malignant cutaneous wounds: a pilot study.
Haisfield-Wolfe ME; Baxendale-Cox LM
Oncol Nurs Forum; 1999 Jul; 26(6):1055-64. PubMed ID: 10420423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The relationship among pressure ulcer risk factors, incidence and nursing documentation in hospital-acquired pressure ulcer patients in intensive care units.
Li D
J Clin Nurs; 2016 Aug; 25(15-16):2336-47. PubMed ID: 27302084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Pressure ulcer risk assessment in critical care: interrater reliability and validity studies of the Braden and Waterlow scales and subjective ratings in two intensive care units.
Kottner J; Dassen T
Int J Nurs Stud; 2010 Jun; 47(6):671-7. PubMed ID: 20003975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pressure ulcer PUSH score and traditional nursing assessment in nursing home residents: do they correlate?
George-Saintilus E; Tommasulo B; Cal CE; Hussain R; Mathew N; Dlugacz Y; Pekmezaris R; Wolf-Klein G
J Am Med Dir Assoc; 2009 Feb; 10(2):141-4. PubMed ID: 19187884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Skin assessment and pressure ulcer care in hospital-based skilled nursing facilities.
Siem CA; Wipke-Tevis DD; Rantz MJ; Popejoy LL
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2003 Jun; 49(6):42-4, 46, 48 passim, contd. PubMed ID: 12874483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Critical care nurses' knowledge of pressure ulcer prevention, staging and description.
Pieper B; Mattern JC
Ostomy Wound Manage; 1997 Mar; 43(2):22-6, 28, 30-1. PubMed ID: 9136995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
