These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23466903)

  • 1. Suboptimal criterion setting in a perceptual choice task with asymmetric reinforcement.
    Stüttgen MC; Kasties N; Lengersdorf D; Starosta S; Güntürkün O; Jäkel F
    Behav Processes; 2013 Jun; 96():59-70. PubMed ID: 23466903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Adaptive criterion setting in perceptual decision making.
    Stüttgen MC; Yildiz A; Güntürkün O
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2011 Sep; 96(2):155-76. PubMed ID: 21909162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Duration ratio discrimination in pigeons: a criterion-setting analysis.
    Fetterman JG
    Behav Processes; 2006 Feb; 71(2-3):330-5. PubMed ID: 16343807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reinforcement contingencies as discriminative stimuli: II. Effects of changes in stimulus probability.
    Lattal KA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1979 Jan; 31(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 429958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Signal probability, reinforcement and signal detection.
    McCarthy D; Davison M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1979 Nov; 32(3):373-86. PubMed ID: 512570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Attention, the presolution period, and choice accuracy in pigeons.
    Chase S; Schupak C; Ploog BO
    Behav Processes; 2012 Mar; 89(3):225-31. PubMed ID: 22138233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Superordinate category formation in pigeons: association with a common delay or probability of food reinforcement makes perceptually dissimilar stimuli functionally equivalent.
    Astley SL; Wasserman EA
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1999 Oct; 25(4):415-32. PubMed ID: 10531658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Theory meets pigeons: the influence of reward-magnitude on discrimination-learning.
    Rose J; Schmidt R; Grabemann M; Güntürkün O
    Behav Brain Res; 2009 Mar; 198(1):125-9. PubMed ID: 19041347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pigeons prefer discriminative stimuli independently of the overall probability of reinforcement and of the number of presentations of the conditioned reinforcer.
    Stagner JP; Laude JR; Zentall TR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2012 Oct; 38(4):446-52. PubMed ID: 23066982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of reinforcement scheduling on simultaneous discrimination performance.
    Nevin JA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1967 May; 10(3):251-60. PubMed ID: 6056798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [The learning capacity of crows and pigeons: the formation of a system of color stimulus discrimination with an increasing number of reinforcements].
    Zorina ZA; Kalinina TA; Markina NV
    Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 1989; 39(4):660-6. PubMed ID: 2816051
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Timescale invariance and Weber's law in choice.
    Jozefowiez J; Cerutti DT; Staddon JE
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2006 Jul; 32(3):229-38. PubMed ID: 16834491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Choice behavior in transition: development of preference for the higher probability of reinforcement.
    Bailey JT; Mazur JE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1990 May; 53(3):409-22. PubMed ID: 2341823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Control of matching by differential outcome expectancies in the absence of differential sample-outcome associations: a serial compound view.
    Demarse TB; Urcuioli PJ
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2005 Oct; 31(4):449-66. PubMed ID: 16248731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Choice, time and food: continuous cyclical changes in food probability between reinforcers.
    Miranda-Dukoski L; Davison M; Elliffe D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2014 May; 101(3):406-21. PubMed ID: 24615528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stimulus control with fixed-ratio reinforcement.
    Zeiler MD
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1968 Mar; 11(2):107-15. PubMed ID: 5645866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Rats' preferences in the suboptimal choice procedure: Evaluating the impact of reinforcement probability and conditioned inhibitors.
    Alba R; Rodríguez W; Martínez M; Orduña V
    Behav Processes; 2018 Dec; 157():574-582. PubMed ID: 29689334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. When is a choice not a choice? Pigeons fail to inhibit incorrect responses on a go/no-go midsession reversal task.
    McMillan N; Sturdy CB; Spetch ML
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2015 Jul; 41(3):255-65. PubMed ID: 25915749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Deviations from matching as a measure of preference for alternatives in pigeons.
    Leigland SM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1979 Jul; 32(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 490100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Observing responses maintained by conditional discriminative stimuli.
    Ohta A
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1987 Nov; 48(3):355-66. PubMed ID: 3430109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.