BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

767 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23467173)

  • 1. The Bonebridge: preclinical evaluation of a new transcutaneously-activated bone anchored hearing device.
    Huber AM; Sim JH; Xie YZ; Chatzimichalis M; Ullrich O; Röösli C
    Hear Res; 2013 Jul; 301():93-9. PubMed ID: 23467173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Transmission of bone conducted sound - correlation between hearing perception and cochlear vibration.
    Eeg-Olofsson M; Stenfelt S; Taghavi H; Reinfeldt S; Håkansson B; Tengstrand T; Finizia C
    Hear Res; 2013 Dec; 306():11-20. PubMed ID: 24047594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of Audiological Results Between a Transcutaneous and a Percutaneous Bone Conduction Instrument in Conductive Hearing Loss.
    Gerdes T; Salcher RB; Schwab B; Lenarz T; Maier H
    Otol Neurotol; 2016 Jul; 37(6):685-91. PubMed ID: 27093021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Better performance with bone-anchored hearing aid than acoustic devices in patients with severe air-bone gap.
    de Wolf MJ; Hendrix S; Cremers CW; Snik AF
    Laryngoscope; 2011 Mar; 121(3):613-6. PubMed ID: 21344443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparisons of sound processors based on osseointegrated implants in patients with conductive or mixed hearing loss.
    Pfiffner F; Caversaccio MD; Kompis M
    Otol Neurotol; 2011 Jul; 32(5):728-35. PubMed ID: 21646934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy and precision of direct bone conduction measurements.
    Sadeghi AM; Flynn M; Davison T; Schulte M; Hillbratt M
    B-ENT; 2016; 12(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 27097393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Audiological and clinical outcomes of a transcutaneous bone conduction hearing implant: Six-month results from a multicentre study.
    den Besten CA; Monksfield P; Bosman A; Skarzynski PH; Green K; Runge C; Wigren S; Blechert JI; Flynn MC; Mylanus EAM; Hol MKS
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2019 Mar; 44(2):144-157. PubMed ID: 30358920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bone-anchored Hearing Aids: correlation between pure-tone thresholds and outcome in three user groups.
    Pfiffner F; Kompis M; Stieger C
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Oct; 30(7):884-90. PubMed ID: 19730146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Audiological and subjective benefit results in bone-anchored hearing device users.
    Boleas-Aguirre MS; Bulnes Plano MD; de Erenchun Lasa IR; Ibáñez Beroiz B
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jun; 33(4):494-503. PubMed ID: 22472615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bone conduction hearing sensitivity in normal-hearing subjects: transcutaneous stimulation at BAHA vs BCI position.
    Reinfeldt S; Håkansson B; Taghavi H; Eeg-Olofsson M
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Jun; 53(6):360-9. PubMed ID: 24588466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Percutaneous versus transcutaneous bone conduction implant system: a feasibility study on a cadaver head.
    Håkansson B; Eeg-Olofsson M; Reinfeldt S; Stenfelt S; Granström G
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Dec; 29(8):1132-9. PubMed ID: 18769364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Candidacy for the bone-anchored hearing aid.
    Snik AF; Bosman AJ; Mylanus EA; Cremers CW
    Audiol Neurootol; 2004; 9(4):190-6. PubMed ID: 15205546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Indication criteria and outcomes with the Bonebridge transcutaneous bone-conduction implant.
    Riss D; Arnoldner C; Baumgartner WD; Blineder M; Flak S; Bachner A; Gstoettner W; Hamzavi JS
    Laryngoscope; 2014 Dec; 124(12):2802-6. PubMed ID: 25142577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fitting range of the BAHA Cordelle.
    Bosman AJ; Snik AF; Mylanus EA; Cremers CW
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Aug; 45(8):429-37. PubMed ID: 17005485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Audiological results with Baha in conductive and mixed hearing loss.
    Pfiffner F; Caversaccio MD; Kompis M
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2011; 71():73-83. PubMed ID: 21389707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hearing gain with a BAHA test-band in patients with single-sided deafness.
    Kim DY; Kim TS; Shim BS; Jin IS; Ahn JH; Chung JW; Yoon TH; Park HJ
    Am J Otolaryngol; 2014; 35(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 24035184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Results of the bone-anchored hearing aid in unilateral hearing loss.
    Wazen JJ; Spitzer J; Ghossaini SN; Kacker A; Zschommler A
    Laryngoscope; 2001 Jun; 111(6):955-8. PubMed ID: 11404603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of a new powerful bone-anchored hearing system: a comparison study.
    Bosman AJ; Snik AF; Hol MK; Mylanus EA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Jun; 24(6):505-13. PubMed ID: 23886427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Audiometric evaluation of bilaterally fitted bone-anchored hearing aids.
    Bosman AJ; Snik AF; van der Pouw CT; Mylanus EA; Cremers CW
    Audiology; 2001; 40(3):158-67. PubMed ID: 11465298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Profound mixed hearing loss: bone-anchored hearing aid system or cochlear implant?
    Verhaegen VJ; Mulder JJ; Mylanus EA; Cremers CW; Snik AF
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2009 Oct; 118(10):693-7. PubMed ID: 19894395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 39.