These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23467696)

  • 21. Interspecific interactions and learning variability jointly drive geographic differences in mate preferences.
    Verzijden MN; Svensson EI
    Evolution; 2016 Aug; 70(8):1896-903. PubMed ID: 27302691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. REINFORCEMENT OF STICKLEBACK MATE PREFERENCES: SYMPATRY BREEDS CONTEMPT.
    Rundle HD; Schluter D
    Evolution; 1998 Feb; 52(1):200-208. PubMed ID: 28568163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The evolution of male and female mating preferences in Drosophila speciation.
    Yukilevich R; Peterson EK
    Evolution; 2019 Sep; 73(9):1759-1773. PubMed ID: 31077339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Female mate choice is a reproductive isolating barrier in
    Southcott L; Kronforst MR
    Ethology; 2018 Dec; 124(12):862-869. PubMed ID: 31024190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Genetics of incipient speciation in Drosophila mojavensis. I. Male courtship song, mating success, and genotype x environment interactions.
    Etges WJ; de Oliveira CC; Gragg E; Ortíz-Barrientos D; Noor MA; Ritchie MG
    Evolution; 2007 May; 61(5):1106-19. PubMed ID: 17492965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Species hybrids in the laboratory but not in nature: a reanalysis of premating isolation between Drosophila arizonae and D. mojavensis.
    Jennings JH; Etges WJ
    Evolution; 2010 Feb; 64(2):587-98. PubMed ID: 19744120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Coevolution of male and female mate choice can destabilize reproductive isolation.
    Aubier TG; Kokko H; Joron M
    Nat Commun; 2019 Nov; 10(1):5122. PubMed ID: 31719522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Sexually monomorphic mating preferences contribute to premating isolation based on song in European green lacewings.
    Noh S; Henry CS
    Evolution; 2010 Jan; 64(1):261-70. PubMed ID: 19703220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Tissue-Specific cis-Regulatory Divergence Implicates eloF in Inhibiting Interspecies Mating in Drosophila.
    Combs PA; Krupp JJ; Khosla NM; Bua D; Petrov DA; Levine JD; Fraser HB
    Curr Biol; 2018 Dec; 28(24):3969-3975.e3. PubMed ID: 30503619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Genetic analysis of female mating recognition between Drosophila ananassae and Drosophila pallidosa: application of interspecific mosaic genome lines.
    Sawamura K; Zhi H; Setoguchi K; Yamada H; Miyo T; Matsuda M; Oguma Y
    Genetica; 2008 Jun; 133(2):179-85. PubMed ID: 17768595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Contact-Chemosensory Evolution Underlying Reproductive Isolation in
    Sato K; Yamamoto D
    Front Behav Neurosci; 2020; 14():597428. PubMed ID: 33343311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The role of mating preferences in shaping interspecific divergence in mating signals in vertebrates.
    Ptacek MB
    Behav Processes; 2000 Oct; 51(1-3):111-134. PubMed ID: 11074316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The neurodevelopmental genes alan shepard and Neuroglian contribute to female mate preference in African Drosophila melanogaster.
    Roy PR; Castillo DM
    J Evol Biol; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38900077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Uniformity in premating reproductive isolation along an intraspecific cline.
    Robertson JM; Nava R; Vega A; Kaiser K
    Curr Zool; 2018 Oct; 64(5):641-652. PubMed ID: 30323843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Male courtship preferences demonstrate discrimination against allopatric colour morphs in a cichlid fish.
    Zoppoth P; Koblmüller S; Sefc KM
    J Evol Biol; 2013 Mar; 26(3):577-86. PubMed ID: 23405907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Beyond magic traits: Multimodal mating cues in Heliconius butterflies.
    Mérot C; Frérot B; Leppik E; Joron M
    Evolution; 2015 Nov; 69(11):2891-904. PubMed ID: 26513426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Does personality affect premating isolation between locally-adapted populations?
    Sommer-Trembo C; Bierbach D; Arias-Rodriguez L; Verel Y; Jourdan J; Zimmer C; Riesch R; Streit B; Plath M
    BMC Evol Biol; 2016 Jun; 16():138. PubMed ID: 27338278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A Drosophila female pheromone elicits species-specific long-range attraction via an olfactory channel with dual specificity for sex and food.
    Lebreton S; Borrero-Echeverry F; Gonzalez F; Solum M; Wallin EA; Hedenström E; Hansson BS; Gustavsson AL; Bengtsson M; Birgersson G; Walker WB; Dweck HKM; Becher PG; Witzgall P
    BMC Biol; 2017 Sep; 15(1):88. PubMed ID: 28962619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A genetically explicit model of speciation by sensory drive within a continuous population in aquatic environments.
    Kawata M; Shoji A; Kawamura S; Seehausen O
    BMC Evol Biol; 2007 Jun; 7():99. PubMed ID: 17598893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Or47b plays a role in Drosophila males' preference for younger mates.
    Zhuang L; Sun Y; Hu M; Wu C; La X; Chen X; Feng Y; Wang X; Hu Y; Xue L
    Open Biol; 2016 Jun; 6(6):. PubMed ID: 27278650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.