251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23468364)
1. Reducing the burden of bone metastases: current concepts and treatment options.
von Moos R; Sternberg C; Body JJ; Bokemeyer C
Support Care Cancer; 2013 Jun; 21(6):1773-83. PubMed ID: 23468364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Economic evaluation of denosumab compared with zoledronic acid in hormone-refractory prostate cancer patients with bone metastases.
Xie J; Namjoshi M; Wu EQ; Parikh K; Diener M; Yu AP; Guo A; Culver KW
J Manag Care Pharm; 2011 Oct; 17(8):621-43. PubMed ID: 21942303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness, and economic evaluation, of denosumab for the treatment of bone metastases from solid tumours.
Ford J; Cummins E; Sharma P; Elders A; Stewart F; Johnston R; Royle P; Jones R; Mulatero C; Todd R; Mowatt G
Health Technol Assess; 2013 Jul; 17(29):1-386. PubMed ID: 23870108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pharmacoeconomics of bisphosphonates for skeletal-related event prevention in metastatic non-breast solid tumours.
Carter JA; Joshi AD; Kaura S; Botteman MF
Pharmacoeconomics; 2012 May; 30(5):373-86. PubMed ID: 22500986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bisphosphonates and other bone agents for breast cancer.
Wong MH; Stockler MR; Pavlakis N
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Feb; (2):CD003474. PubMed ID: 22336790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Zoledronic acid: a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in the management of bone metastases.
McKeage K; Plosker GL
Pharmacoeconomics; 2008; 26(3):251-68. PubMed ID: 18282018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost-effectiveness of denosumab vs zoledronic acid for prevention of skeletal-related events in patients with solid tumors and bone metastases in the United States.
Stopeck A; Rader M; Henry D; Danese M; Halperin M; Cong Z; Qian Y; Dansey R; Chung K
J Med Econ; 2012; 15(4):712-23. PubMed ID: 22409231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost-effectiveness of denosumab for the prevention of skeletal-related events in patients with solid tumors and bone metastases in the United States.
Stopeck A; Brufsky A; Kennedy L; Bhatta S; Bhowmik D; Buchanan J; Despiegel N; Hechmati G
J Med Econ; 2020 Jan; 23(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 31364885
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Management of bone health in solid tumours: From bisphosphonates to a monoclonal antibody.
von Moos R; Costa L; Gonzalez-Suarez E; Terpos E; Niepel D; Body JJ
Cancer Treat Rev; 2019 Jun; 76():57-67. PubMed ID: 31136850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Meta-analysis comparing denosumab and zoledronic acid for treatment of bone metastases in patients with advanced solid tumours.
Zheng GZ; Chang B; Lin FX; Xie D; Hu QX; Yu GY; Du SX; Li XD
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2017 Nov; 26(6):. PubMed ID: 27430483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Denosumab compared with zoledronic acid for the treatment of bone metastases in patients with advanced breast cancer: a randomized, double-blind study.
Stopeck AT; Lipton A; Body JJ; Steger GG; Tonkin K; de Boer RH; Lichinitser M; Fujiwara Y; Yardley DA; Viniegra M; Fan M; Jiang Q; Dansey R; Jun S; Braun A
J Clin Oncol; 2010 Dec; 28(35):5132-9. PubMed ID: 21060033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comprehensive review of denosumab for bone metastasis in patients with solid tumors.
Gül G; Sendur MA; Aksoy S; Sever AR; Altundag K
Curr Med Res Opin; 2016; 32(1):133-45. PubMed ID: 26451465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Advances in prevention and treatment of bone metastases in prostate cancer. Role of RANK/RANKL inhibition.
Gomez-Veiga F; Ponce-Reixa J; Martinez-Breijo S; Planas J; Morote J
Actas Urol Esp; 2013 May; 37(5):292-304. PubMed ID: 23246105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. SEOM guidelines for the treatment of bone metastases from solid tumours.
Cassinello Espinosa J; González Del Alba Baamonde A; Rivera Herrero F; Holgado Martín E;
Clin Transl Oncol; 2012 Jul; 14(7):505-11. PubMed ID: 22721794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Zoledronic acid : a review of its use in the management of bone metastases of malignancy.
Dhillon S; Lyseng-Williamson KA
Drugs; 2008; 68(4):507-34. PubMed ID: 18318568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Harnessing the potential of therapeutic agents to safeguard bone health in prostate cancer.
Miller K; Steger GG; Niepel D; Lüftner D
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2018 Nov; 21(4):461-472. PubMed ID: 29988100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Health resource utilisation associated with skeletal-related events in patients with bone metastases secondary to solid tumours: regional comparisons in an observational study.
Duran I; Fink MG; Bahl A; Hoefeler H; Mahmood A; Lüftner D; Ghazal H; Wei R; Chung KC; Hechmati G; Green J; Atchison C
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2017 Nov; 26(6):. PubMed ID: 26865392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Inhibition of RANK ligand to treat bone metastases].
Body JJ
Bull Cancer; 2013 Nov; 100(11):1207-13. PubMed ID: 24158618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Metastatic Prostate Cancer and the Bone: Significance and Therapeutic Options.
Gartrell BA; Coleman R; Efstathiou E; Fizazi K; Logothetis CJ; Smith MR; Sonpavde G; Sartor O; Saad F
Eur Urol; 2015 Nov; 68(5):850-8. PubMed ID: 26153564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Denosumab versus bisphosphonates for the treatment of bone metastases from solid tumors: a systematic review.
Matuoka JY; Kahn JG; Secoli SR
Eur J Health Econ; 2019 Jun; 20(4):487-499. PubMed ID: 30382484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
