178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23469275)
1. Improved detection of Mycobacterium bovis infection in bovine lymph node tissue using immunomagnetic separation (IMS)-based methods.
Stewart LD; McNair J; McCallan L; Gordon A; Grant IR
PLoS One; 2013; 8(3):e58374. PubMed ID: 23469275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Production and evaluation of antibodies and phage display-derived peptide ligands for immunomagnetic separation of Mycobacterium bovis.
Stewart LD; McNair J; McCallan L; Thompson S; Kulakov LA; Grant IR
J Clin Microbiol; 2012 May; 50(5):1598-605. PubMed ID: 22322353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Improved detection of Mycobacterium bovis in bovine tissues using immunomagnetic separation approaches.
Grant IR; Stewart LD
Methods Mol Biol; 2015; 1247():153-61. PubMed ID: 25399094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Development of a novel immunochromatographic lateral flow assay specific for Mycobacterium bovis cells and its application in combination with immunomagnetic separation to test badger faeces.
Stewart LD; Tort N; Meakin P; Argudo JM; Nzuma R; Reid N; Delahay RJ; Ashford R; Montgomery WI; Grant IR
BMC Vet Res; 2017 May; 13(1):131. PubMed ID: 28499434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of an immunomagnetic capture method followed by PCR to detect Mycobacterium bovis in tissue samples from cattle.
Garbaccio SG; Cataldi AA
Rev Argent Microbiol; 2010; 42(4):247-53. PubMed ID: 21229192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Rapid detection of Mycobacterium bovis DNA in cattle lymph nodes with visible lesions using PCR.
Taylor GM; Worth DR; Palmer S; Jahans K; Hewinson RG
BMC Vet Res; 2007 Jun; 3():12. PubMed ID: 17567891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Direct detection of Mycobacterium bovis in bovine lymph nodes by PCR.
Cardoso MA; Cardoso RF; Hirata RD; Hirata MH; Leite CQ; Santos AC; Siqueira VL; Okano W; Rocha NS; Lonardoni MV
Zoonoses Public Health; 2009 Oct; 56(8):465-70. PubMed ID: 19175568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Novel potential diagnostic test for Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex using combined immunomagnetic separation (IMS) and PCR-CTPP.
Intorasoot S; Tharinjaroen CS; Phunpae P; Butr-Indr B; Anukool U; Intachai K; Orrapin S; Apiratmateekul N; Arunothong S; Suthachai V; Saengsawang K; Khamnoi P; Pata S; Kasinrerk W; Tragoolpua K
J Appl Microbiol; 2016 Aug; 121(2):528-38. PubMed ID: 27111352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Detection of Mycobacterium bovis in bovine clinical specimens using real-time fluorescence and fluorescence resonance energy transfer probe rapid-cycle PCR.
Taylor MJ; Hughes MS; Skuce RA; Neill SD
J Clin Microbiol; 2001 Apr; 39(4):1272-8. PubMed ID: 11283040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of the Abbott LCx Mycobacterium tuberculosis assay for direct detection of Mycobacterium bovis in bovine tissue samples.
Valente C; Cuteri V; Ausili E; Piersimoni C
Vet Res Commun; 2002 Jan; 26(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 11860084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Use of a macrophage cell line for rapid detection of Mycobacterium bovis in diagnostic samples.
Ritelli M; Amadori M; Tagliabue S; Pacciarini ML
Vet Microbiol; 2003 Jul; 94(2):105-20. PubMed ID: 12781479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of the recovery of Mycobacterium bovis isolates using the BACTEC MGIT 960 system, BACTEC 460 system, and Middlebrook 7H10 and 7H11 solid media.
Hines N; Payeur JB; Hoffman LJ
J Vet Diagn Invest; 2006 May; 18(3):243-50. PubMed ID: 16789711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Simultaneous detection and strain differentiation of Mycobacterium bovis directly from bovine tissue specimens by spoligotyping.
Roring S; Hughes MS; Skuce RA; Neill SD
Vet Microbiol; 2000 Jun; 74(3):227-36. PubMed ID: 10808091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of antigenic supplementation of bovine purified protein derivative for diagnosis of subclinical infection with Mycobacterium bovis in cattle.
Alvarez AH; Gutiérrez-Ortega A; Gómez-Entzin V; Pérez-Mayorga G; Naranjo-Bastién J; González-Martínez V; Milián-Suazo F; Martínez-Velázquez M; Herrera-Rodríguez S; Hinojoza-Loza E
Microb Pathog; 2017 Jul; 108():114-121. PubMed ID: 28487230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A one-tube nested polymerase chain reaction for the detection of mycobacterium bovis in spiked milk samples: an evaluation of concentration and lytic techniques.
Antognoli MC; Salman MD; Triantis J; Hernández J; Keefe T
J Vet Diagn Invest; 2001 Mar; 13(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 11289205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A multiplex approach to molecular detection of Brucella abortus and/or Mycobacterium bovis infection in cattle.
Sreevatsan S; Bookout JB; Ringpis F; Perumaalla VS; Ficht TA; Adams LG; Hagius SD; Elzer PH; Bricker BJ; Kumar GK; Rajasekhar M; Isloor S; Barathur RR
J Clin Microbiol; 2000 Jul; 38(7):2602-10. PubMed ID: 10878051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Detection of Mycobacterium bovis in bovine and bubaline tissues using nested-PCR for TbD1.
Araújo CP; Osório AL; Jorge KS; Ramos CA; Filho AF; Vidal CE; Roxo E; Nishibe C; Almeida NF; Júnior AA; Silva MR; Neto JD; Cerqueira VD; Zumárraga MJ; Araújo FR
PLoS One; 2014; 9(3):e91023. PubMed ID: 24618787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evidence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex bacteraemia in intradermal skin test positive cattle detected using phage-RPA.
Swift BM; Convery TW; Rees CE
Virulence; 2016 Oct; 7(7):779-88. PubMed ID: 27197018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improved detection of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis In milk by immunomagnetic PCR.
Grant IR; Pope CM; O'Riordan LM; Ball HJ; Rowe MT
Vet Microbiol; 2000 Dec; 77(3-4):369-78. PubMed ID: 11118722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Improved specificity for detection of Mycobacterium bovis in fresh tissues using IS6110 real-time PCR.
Thacker TC; Harris B; Palmer MV; Waters WR
BMC Vet Res; 2011 Aug; 7():50. PubMed ID: 21867516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
