These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23469700)
1. A common scheme for cross-sensory correspondences across stimulus domains. Walker L; Walker P; Francis B Perception; 2012; 41(10):1186-92. PubMed ID: 23469700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cross-sensory correspondences and cross talk between dimensions of connotative meaning: visual angularity is hard, high-pitched, and bright. Walker P Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Nov; 74(8):1792-809. PubMed ID: 22833281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Size-brightness correspondence: crosstalk and congruity among dimensions of connotative meaning. Walker P; Walker L Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Aug; 74(6):1226-40. PubMed ID: 22484796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cross-sensory correspondences and symbolism in spoken and written language. Walker P J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Sep; 42(9):1339-61. PubMed ID: 26913934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The size-brightness correspondence: evidence for crosstalk among aligned conceptual feature dimensions. Walker P; Walker L; Francis B Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Nov; 77(8):2694-710. PubMed ID: 26294420 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The role of visual experience in the emergence of cross-modal correspondences. Hamilton-Fletcher G; Pisanski K; Reby D; Stefańczyk M; Ward J; Sorokowska A Cognition; 2018 Jun; 175():114-121. PubMed ID: 29502009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cross-sensory correspondences and naive conceptions of natural phenomena. Walker P Perception; 2012; 41(5):620-2. PubMed ID: 23025164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Visual, auditory and tactile stimuli compete for early sensory processing capacities within but not between senses. Porcu E; Keitel C; Müller MM Neuroimage; 2014 Aug; 97():224-35. PubMed ID: 24736186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Audio-Visual, Visuo-Tactile and Audio-Tactile Correspondences in Preschoolers. Nava E; Grassi M; Turati C Multisens Res; 2016; 29(1-3):93-111. PubMed ID: 27311292 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Summation of visual attributes in auditory-visual crossmodal correspondences. Jonas C; Spiller MJ; Hibbard P Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Aug; 24(4):1104-1112. PubMed ID: 28695529 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The nature and origin of cross-modal associations to odours. Stevenson RJ; Rich A; Russell A Perception; 2012; 41(5):606-19. PubMed ID: 23025163 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Lightness/pitch and elevation/pitch crossmodal correspondences are low-level sensory effects. Zeljko M; Kritikos A; Grove PM Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Jul; 81(5):1609-1623. PubMed ID: 30697648 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Preschoolers' crossmodal mappings of timbre. Wallmark Z; Allen SE Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jul; 82(5):2230-2236. PubMed ID: 32166645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The co-occurrence of multisensory facilitation and cross-modal conflict in the human brain. Diaconescu AO; Alain C; McIntosh AR J Neurophysiol; 2011 Dec; 106(6):2896-909. PubMed ID: 21880944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The anterior N1 component as an index of modality shifting. Töllner T; Gramann K; Müller HJ; Eimer M J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Sep; 21(9):1653-69. PubMed ID: 18767917 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Tactile recognition of visual stimuli: Specificity versus generalization of perceptual learning. Arnold G; Auvray M Vision Res; 2018 Nov; 152():40-50. PubMed ID: 29258869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Synaesthetic interactions across vision and audition. Krugliak A; Noppeney U Neuropsychologia; 2016 Jul; 88():65-73. PubMed ID: 26427739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]